Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Conventional Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT ID: NCT02118974
Last Updated: 2017-01-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
144 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-05-31
2015-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at a Teaching Institution
NCT01581905
Study Comparing Conventional vs. Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT00485355
Feasibility of a Trial of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Laparoscopic Sub-Total Hysterectomy
NCT01825915
Minimally Invasive Benign Hysterectomy
NCT01865929
Robotic-assisted Hysterectomy: Single- vs. Multi-port Laparoscopic Access
NCT03373513
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The care for the patients enrolled in this study will not deviate from the standard care of patients who are currently undergoing laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. The patients who present to the office for pre-operative history and physical examination for laparoscopic hysterectomy will be counseled about participation in this study. Basic data collection will commence at the pre-operative visiting, including: patient demographics, past medical history, past surgical history, physical exam findings, and imaging results. The pre-operative appointment will occur between one to thirty days prior to surgery. Intra-operative and immediate post-operative data will be collected by the surgical assistant (resident or fellow) and will include surgical procedure (conventional laparoscopic or robot-assisted), operative time, hematocrit, estimated blood loss, length of stay, and complications.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Robot-assisted
Robot-assisted hysterectomy
Hysterectomy
Hysterectomy
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Hysterectomy
Hysterectomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hysterectomy
Hysterectomy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to consent to the procedure
Exclusion Criteria
2. Medical conditions not allowing proper ventilation during anesthesia
3. Pelvic organ prolapse amendable to a vaginal approach
4. Pregnant women
5. Patients undergoing planned combined procedures including bowel resection (other than coincidental appendectomy) or major urologic procedures.
18 Years
80 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Timothy A Deimling
Fellow Minimally Invasive GYN Surgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Penn State Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Deimling TA, Eldridge JL, Riley KA, Kunselman AR, Harkins GJ. Randomized controlled trial comparing operative times between standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Jan;136(1):64-69. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12001. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY00000164
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.