Effect of Lower Pneumoperitoneum Pressure During Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy
NCT ID: NCT04125173
Last Updated: 2021-12-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-03-03
2021-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pain With Differing Insufflation Pressures During Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT06508814
Safety, Efficacy and Operability of Using the New Tissue Containment System During Laprascopic Hysterectomy
NCT04423172
Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Conventional Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT02118974
Postoperative Pain After Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: a Comparison of Single-port and Three-port Laparoscopy
NCT02390804
Study Comparing Conventional vs. Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT00485355
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There are several publications investigating the effect of lower pneumoperitoneum pressures on postoperative pain. A systematic review in 2016 included 238 patients (three RCTs), showed pneumoperitoneum pressures of 8mmHg had a statistically significant although minimal decrease in postoperative pain compared to 12mmHg, although lower pressures were associated with worse visualization. The authors concluded that the systematic review was inconclusive and further studies were necessary. A randomized pilot study with 60 patients comparing low pressure (7mmHg) using the AirSeal System versus standard insufflation (15mmHg), showed lower postoperative shoulder pain in the group with lower pressure using the AirSeal system. Two abstracts in the Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology present retrospective studies showing decreased postoperative pain with lower pneumoperitoneum pressure. The first abstract is from 2015, included a sample size of 170 patients who underwent benign robotic gynecologic surgery, 85 patients in each arm (12mmHg and 15mmHg). They showed no difference in median recovery time in the PACU and significantly lower median first pain score (5 vs 6, p=.04). The second abstract is from 2018 and included a sample size of 598 patients who underwent benign robotic gynecologic surgery, 99 patients in 15mmHg arm, 100 patients in 12mmHg arm, 99 patients in 10mmHg arm, and 300 patients in 8mmHg arm. They showed lower initial pain scores with each degree of lower pressure (5.9 vs 5.4 vs 4.4 vs 3.8, p=\<.0001) and shorter hospital stays with lower pressures. They showed no difference in operative times or blood loss in the four arms. Similar studies have been done with cholecystectomy patients that have shown improved postoperative shoulder pain with lower pneumoperitoneum pressures. There is also an ongoing clinical trial that is still recruiting patients that is studying this similar comparison using 9mmHg vs 15mmHg with and without the AirSeal system.
However, the literature summarized here has never included blinding the intervention of lower pneumoperitoneum pressure to the surgeon to determine awareness of pressure and its effect on visualization and physician satisfaction.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1. Pneumoperitoneum pressure = 15mmHg
1\. Pneumoperitoneum will be set at 15mmHg
Pneumoperitoneum pressure = 15mmHg
Randomized pneumoperitoneum 1
2. Pneumoperitoneum pressure = 12mmHg
2.Pneumoperitoneum will be set at 12mmHg
Pneumoperitoneum pressure = 12mm Hg
Randomized pneumoperitoneum 2
3. Pneumoperitoneum set at 10mmHg
3\. Pneumoperitoneum will be set at 10mmHg
Pneumoperitoneum pressure = 10mmHg
Randomized pneumoperitoneum 3
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pneumoperitoneum pressure = 15mmHg
Randomized pneumoperitoneum 1
Pneumoperitoneum pressure = 12mm Hg
Randomized pneumoperitoneum 2
Pneumoperitoneum pressure = 10mmHg
Randomized pneumoperitoneum 3
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* greater than or equal to 18 years old
* English-speaking
* undergoing laparoscopic or robotic total hysterectomy for benign indications by one of the two minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons at Banner University Medical Center - Phoenix
Exclusion Criteria
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score III or IV
* preoperative uterine weight estimated to be greater than 500gm (measured by sonography and using the following formula: length x width x anteroposterior diameter x 0.52)
* patients on chronic opioids for chronic pain (defined as \> 3 months regular opioid use)
* patients who refuse participation in the study
* patients who do not provide informed consent
18 Years
99 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Arizona
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rachael Bailey Smith
Rachael Smith, DO Fellow Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Foley, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Banner University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Banner University Medical Center Phoenix
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kyle EB, Maheux-Lacroix S, Boutin A, Laberge PY, Lemyre M. Low vs Standard Pressures in Gynecologic Laparoscopy: a Systematic Review. JSLS. 2016 Jan-Mar;20(1):e2015.00113. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2015.00113.
Bogani G, Uccella S, Cromi A, Serati M, Casarin J, Pinelli C, Ghezzi F. Low vs standard pneumoperitoneum pressure during laparoscopic hysterectomy: prospective randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):466-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.12.091. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
Sroussi J, Elies A, Rigouzzo A, Louvet N, Mezzadri M, Fazel A, Benifla JL. Low pressure gynecological laparoscopy (7mmHg) with AirSeal(R) System versus a standard insufflation (15mmHg): A pilot study in 60 patients. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017 Feb;46(2):155-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2016.09.003. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
3. Kim DK, Cheong ILY, Lee GY, Cho JH. Low pressure (8 mm Hg) pneumoperitoneum does not reduce the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) following gynecologic laparoscopy. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2006.
Topcu HO, Cavkaytar S, Kokanali K, Guzel AI, Islimye M, Doganay M. A prospective randomized trial of postoperative pain following different insufflation pressures during gynecologic laparoscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Nov;182:81-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
Nasajiyan N, Javaherfourosh F, Ghomeishi A, Akhondzadeh R, Pazyar F, Hamoonpou N. Comparison of low and standard pressure gas injection at abdominal cavity on postoperative nausea and vomiting in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pak J Med Sci. 2014 Sep;30(5):1083-7. doi: 10.12669/pjms.305.5010.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1909975965
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.