Postoperative Pain After Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: a Comparison of Single-port and Three-port Laparoscopy
NCT ID: NCT02390804
Last Updated: 2015-03-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-03-31
2015-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of Different Pain Scores in Single-Port Access (SPA) Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT01064128
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Via a Single Port, Peri-umbilical Technique Versus a Conventional Laparoscopic Technique
NCT01830738
ESP vs TAP in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT04839445
Study of Laparoendoscopic Single Site Hysterectomy in Benign and Preinvasive Uterine Disease
NCT01679548
Two-channel Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia (IV-PCA) After Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy (TLH)
NCT04082039
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy
total laparoscopic hysterectomy via transumbilical single port
single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy(single port trochar)
perform laparoscopic hysterectomy via single-port access
multi-port laparoscopic hysterectomy
total laparoscopic hysterectomy via multi-port (3 port)
multi-port laparoscopic hysterectomy(multi port trochar)
perform laparoscopic hysterectomy via multi-port access
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy(single port trochar)
perform laparoscopic hysterectomy via single-port access
multi-port laparoscopic hysterectomy(multi port trochar)
perform laparoscopic hysterectomy via multi-port access
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
2. the need for simultaneous interventions such as prolapse repair
3. uterine size greater than 18 weeks of gestation
4. ongoing peritoneal dialysis
5. diseases associated with abdominal pain such as pancreatitis
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Catholic University of Korea
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yong Seok Lee
associated professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ji-Hyun Chung, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
The Catholic University of Korea
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lee YY, Kim TJ, Kim CJ, Kang H, Choi CH, Lee JW, Kim BG, Lee JH, Bae DS. Single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a novel method with a wound retractor and a glove. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):450-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.03.022. Epub 2009 May 31.
Jung YW, Kim YT, Lee DW, Hwang YI, Nam EJ, Kim JH, Kim SW. The feasibility of scarless single-port transumbilical total laparoscopic hysterectomy: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc. 2010 Jul;24(7):1686-92. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0830-7. Epub 2009 Dec 25.
Ng PC. Re: Surg Endosc (2009) 23:1142-1145, DOI:10.1007/s00464-009-0382-x (published online 5 March 2009). Erica P. Podolsky, Steven J. Rottman, Paul G. Curcillo II. Single Port Access (SPA) gastrostomy tube in patients unable to receive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement. Surg Endosc. 2010 Apr;24(4):970. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0705-y. No abstract available.
Fagotti A, Bottoni C, Vizzielli G, Gueli Alletti S, Scambia G, Marana E, Fanfani F. Postoperative pain after conventional laparoscopy and laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) for benign adnexal disease: a randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2011 Jul;96(1):255-259.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 May 11.
Song T, Kim ML, Jung YW, Yoon BS, Joo WD, Seong SJ. Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;209(4):317.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
Eom JM, Choi JS, Choi WJ, Kim YH, Lee JH. Does single-port laparoscopic surgery reduce postoperative pain in women with benign gynecologic disease? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Dec;23(12):999-1005. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0184. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DC14EISI0026
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.