To Compare to 2-channel and Multiple-channel Single Port Laparoscopic-assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy

NCT ID: NCT01564602

Last Updated: 2012-04-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main objective of this trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of single port-access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. The operative time, weight of the uterus, blood loss and hospital stay will be record, respectively. The pain score is based on the visual analogue scale in which patients record the intensity of their pain 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Single port laparoscopy is an attempt to further enhance the cosmetic benefits of minimally invasive surgery while minimizing the potential morbidity associated with multiple incisions. Preliminary advances in LESS as applied to urologic and gastrointestinal surgery demonstrate that the techniques are feasible provided that both optimal surgical technical expertise with advanced skills and optimal instrumentation are available. Recently, Lee et al. performed the multiple channel single port-access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (SPA-LAVH) in 24 patient. All cases but 3 were performed exclusively through a single port. The median operative time, weight of the uterus, and estimated blood loss were 119 minutes (range 90 to 255 minutes), 347 g (range 225 to 732 g), and 400 mL (range 100 to 1000 mL), respectively. The median hospital stay (postoperative day) was 3 days (range 3 to 7). Although there are a limited number of studies demonstrating the feasibility of single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH), single-port surgery is "new-old" (i.e., a revisited and unstandardized technique) because the major disadvantage of limited movement caused by collisions of the laparoscopic instruments has been mitigated by the development of multi-channel approaches. Therefore, the investigators used a 2-channel single-port system, which was different from the previously published 3-channel single-port technique11,12 to reduce collisions and aid the assistant in controlling the scope without interfering with the surgeon's instruments. To our knowledge, there are no randomize control trial to evaluate of 2-channel or multiple channel single port laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic disorders. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of 2-channel and multiple-channel single port laparoscopy in the treatment of benign uterine disease.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myoma Adenomyosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

single port laparoscopic surgery

2-channel or multiple channel single port laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic disorders

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

comparison multiple channel port laparoscopic surgery

Intervention Type DEVICE

to compare 2-channel single port and multiple channel port laparoscopic surgery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

comparison multiple channel port laparoscopic surgery

to compare 2-channel single port and multiple channel port laparoscopic surgery

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

multiple channel port laparoscopic surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients receive laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH)
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of patient: classification I-II

Exclusion Criteria

* The procedure will be required to conversion to laparotomy.
* Any cardio-vascular diseases.
* Malignant disease
Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

vghtpe user

Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yi-Jen Chen, PHD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Taipei Veterans General Hospital

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Yi-Jen Chen, PHD

Role: primary

886-2-28757566

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VGH2011-03-011IA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

LESS-TLH Versus LESS-LAVH
NCT01861067 COMPLETED PHASE3