Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT ID: NCT01483417
Last Updated: 2012-02-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
240 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-12-31
2013-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Single-port Access Laparoscopic-assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy
NCT01048931
3-dimensional Versus 2-dimensional Laparoscopy for Hysterectomy
NCT04070872
Study of Laparoendoscopic Single Site Hysterectomy in Benign and Preinvasive Uterine Disease
NCT01679548
3-dimensional Versus 2-dimensional Laparoscopy for Myomectomy
NCT04070716
Single Port Myomectomy Versus Conventional Myomectomy
NCT01826578
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SILS
Laparoscopic hysterectomy including LAVH, LH(a), and TLH using SILS port
Single incision Laparoscopic hysterectomy
SILS port
Conventional multi-port laparoscopic hysterectomy
3-4 ports laparoscopic hysterectomy including LAVH, LH(a), or TLH
Conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy
3-4 conventional ports
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Single incision Laparoscopic hysterectomy
SILS port
Conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy
3-4 conventional ports
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Uterine size \< gestational age of 14 weeks
* Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Huge uterine size \> gestational age of 14 weeks
20 Years
60 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Samsung Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tae-Joong Kim
Clinical Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Chi-Heum Cho, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital
Deagu, , South Korea
Catholic Incheon Hospital
Incheon, , South Korea
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, , South Korea
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, , South Korea
Kangnam Cha Hospital
Seoul, , South Korea
Seoul Catholic Medical Center
Seoul, , South Korea
Yonsei University Medical Center
Seoul, , South Korea
Seoul University Bundang Hospital
Seungnam, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Chi-Heum Cho, MD,PhD
Role: primary
Yong Wook Kim
Role: primary
Yong Man Kim
Role: primary
Suk Joo Sung
Role: primary
Soo Young Hur
Role: primary
Sang Wun Kim
Role: primary
Yong Beom Kim
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kim TJ, Lee YY, Cha HH, Kim CJ, Choi CH, Lee JW, Bae DS, Lee JH, Kim BG. Single-port-access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2010 Sep;24(9):2248-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0944-y. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
Lee YY, Kim TJ, Kim CJ, Kang H, Choi CH, Lee JW, Kim BG, Lee JH, Bae DS. Single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a novel method with a wound retractor and a glove. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):450-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.03.022. Epub 2009 May 31.
Jung YW, Lee M, Yim GW, Lee SH, Paek JH, Kwon HY, Nam EJ, Kim SW, Kim YT. A randomized prospective study of single-port and four-port approaches for hysterectomy in terms of postoperative pain. Surg Endosc. 2011 Aug;25(8):2462-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1567-z. Epub 2011 Feb 7.
Chen YJ, Wang PH, Ocampo EJ, Twu NF, Yen MS, Chao KC. Single-port compared with conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;117(4):906-912. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820c666a.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2011-10-004
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.