Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

NCT ID: NCT01483417

Last Updated: 2012-02-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

240 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-12-31

Study Completion Date

2013-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Multi-center prospective randomized trial of single port laparoscopic surgery (SILS) versus conventional 3-4 ports laparoscopic hysterectomy. Hypothesis is that conversion rate of SILS is not inferior to that of conventional approach.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Uterine Myoma Uterine Adenomyosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SILS

Laparoscopic hysterectomy including LAVH, LH(a), and TLH using SILS port

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Single incision Laparoscopic hysterectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

SILS port

Conventional multi-port laparoscopic hysterectomy

3-4 ports laparoscopic hysterectomy including LAVH, LH(a), or TLH

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

3-4 conventional ports

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Single incision Laparoscopic hysterectomy

SILS port

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy

3-4 conventional ports

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Symptomatic (dysmenorrhea, palpable mass, pelvic pain or discomfort urinary symptom, increasing size, menorrhagia) myomas or adenomyomas
* Uterine size \< gestational age of 14 weeks
* Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Medical diseases such as heart failure, renal insufficiency, liver cirrhosis, pancreatitis, uncontrolled DM
* Huge uterine size \> gestational age of 14 weeks
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Samsung Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tae-Joong Kim

Clinical Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Chi-Heum Cho, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital

Deagu, , South Korea

Site Status RECRUITING

Catholic Incheon Hospital

Incheon, , South Korea

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Samsung Medical Center

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status RECRUITING

Asan Medical Center

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Kangnam Cha Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status RECRUITING

Seoul Catholic Medical Center

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Yonsei University Medical Center

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Seoul University Bundang Hospital

Seungnam, , South Korea

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Chi-Heum Cho, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Sang Hun Kwon, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Chi-Heum Cho, MD,PhD

Role: primary

Yong Wook Kim

Role: primary

Tae Joong Kim, MD

Role: primary

82-2-3410-3547

Yong Man Kim

Role: primary

Suk Joo Sung

Role: primary

Soo Young Hur

Role: primary

Sang Wun Kim

Role: primary

Yong Beom Kim

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kim TJ, Lee YY, Cha HH, Kim CJ, Choi CH, Lee JW, Bae DS, Lee JH, Kim BG. Single-port-access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2010 Sep;24(9):2248-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0944-y. Epub 2010 Feb 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20177921 (View on PubMed)

Lee YY, Kim TJ, Kim CJ, Kang H, Choi CH, Lee JW, Kim BG, Lee JH, Bae DS. Single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a novel method with a wound retractor and a glove. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):450-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.03.022. Epub 2009 May 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19487164 (View on PubMed)

Jung YW, Lee M, Yim GW, Lee SH, Paek JH, Kwon HY, Nam EJ, Kim SW, Kim YT. A randomized prospective study of single-port and four-port approaches for hysterectomy in terms of postoperative pain. Surg Endosc. 2011 Aug;25(8):2462-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1567-z. Epub 2011 Feb 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21298522 (View on PubMed)

Chen YJ, Wang PH, Ocampo EJ, Twu NF, Yen MS, Chao KC. Single-port compared with conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;117(4):906-912. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820c666a.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21422864 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-10-004

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

LESS-TLH Versus LESS-LAVH
NCT01861067 COMPLETED PHASE3