Hand-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery (HALS) for Myomectomy

NCT ID: NCT01858454

Last Updated: 2015-04-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

21 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-03-31

Study Completion Date

2015-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) for myomectomy, and compare it with the open approach in myomectomy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Uterine myomas are the most common benign tumor of the female genital tract and the leading indication for hysterectomy. Despite the fact that laparoscopic myomectomy is becoming increasingly popular, laparoscopic myomectomy remains underutilized because of inherit limitations. The limitations include technical challenges such as dissection of the myoma from its bed using the correct plane or multilayer closure of the myoma bed and the concern about the strength of the suturing and the subsequent risk of uterine rupture. As a result, laparoscopic myomectomy is currently performed only by expert surgeons.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) is a unique surgical approach that may overcome the limitations of pure laparoscopic surgery. HALS is not only less invasive than open surgery but also causes less technical challenges than laparoscopic surgery based on its manual nature and ability to use retractors. In gynecologic field, HALS has also been employed in ovarian cancers and large ovarian tumors.

In theory, HALS seems appropriate procedure, similar to the open approach, for patients with multiple or huge myomas. To date, no report has evaluated the feasibility and usefulness of HALS compared with open surgery (OS).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Uterine Myomas

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

HALS for myomectomy

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for myomectomy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

HALS

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In HALS, a trocar of 5-mm calipers was inserted through the umbilicus. Next, suprapubic transverse skin incision of 3-4cm in length was made and a wound retractor (Alexis; Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA) was inserted through the suprapubic opening.

Open myomectomy

Open surgery for myomectomy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Open surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In open surgery, the patient was placed in the supine position and the operation was carried out in a standard manner as described elsewhere \[Luciano AA. Myomectomy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2009;52:362-71.\].

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HALS

In HALS, a trocar of 5-mm calipers was inserted through the umbilicus. Next, suprapubic transverse skin incision of 3-4cm in length was made and a wound retractor (Alexis; Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA) was inserted through the suprapubic opening.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open surgery

In open surgery, the patient was placed in the supine position and the operation was carried out in a standard manner as described elsewhere \[Luciano AA. Myomectomy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2009;52:362-71.\].

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Inclusion criteria were as follows: women who had myoma-related symptoms such as menorrhagia, pelvic pressure/pain, or infertility; women who were not pregnant at the time of presentation (i.e., negative for urine pregnancy test or last menstrual period within the last 4 weeks); and women who were appropriated medical status for laparoscopic surgery (American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification 1 or 2).

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria included any other uterine or adnexal abnormalities (e.g., abnormal endometrial thickness, and suspected ovarian or uterine malignancy), any sign of genital infection, presence of submucosal or pedunculated myoma as a dominant myoma, treatment of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist 2 months before surgery, or an inability to understand and provide written informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

CHA University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Taejong Song

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Taejong Song, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA university, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHA Gangnam Medical Center

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KNC13-012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Radiofrequency Ablation of Uterine Fibroids
NCT00584207 TERMINATED EARLY_PHASE1