Ultrasound-Guided Rectus Sheath Block in Gynecological Single-Port Laparoscopy

NCT ID: NCT06862947

Last Updated: 2025-03-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-04-26

Study Completion Date

2024-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Title: Ultrasound-Guided Rectus Sheath Block in Gynecological Single-Port Laparoscopy

Brief Summary:

This study aims to evaluate the effects of preoperative ultrasound-guided bilateral rectus sheath block (RSB) on analgesic efficacy and recovery outcomes in patients undergoing gynecological single-port laparoscopy. The study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 90 patients aged 18 to 65 years, with ASA I or II physical status, scheduled for single-port laparoscopic surgery lasting less than 2 hours. Participants are randomly assigned to either the RSB group or the placebo group, with 45 patients in each group. The RSB group receives bilateral RSB with 15 ml of 0.4% ropivacaine on each side, while the placebo group receives an equal volume of 0.9% saline. The primary outcome is postoperative pain assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at multiple time points. Secondary outcomes include opioid consumption, effective activations of the analgesia pump, and postoperative recovery parameters such as time to mobilization and length of hospital stay. The study hypothesizes that preoperative ultrasound-guided bilateral RSB will significantly improve postoperative

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background:

Gynecological single-port laparoscopy has become a preferred surgical approach due to its minimal trauma, concealed scarring, and rapid postoperative recovery. However, postoperative pain and slow recovery of gastrointestinal function remain challenges. Traditional analgesic protocols often rely on opioids, which can cause adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, bowel paralysis, and respiratory depression.

Objective:

This study aims to evaluate the effects of preoperative ultrasound-guided bilateral rectus sheath block (RSB) on analgesic efficacy and recovery outcomes in patients undergoing gynecological single-port laparoscopy.

Methods:

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants are 90 patients aged 18 to 65 years, ASA I or II, scheduled for single-port laparoscopic surgery lasting less than 2 hours. They are randomly assigned to either the RSB group or the placebo group, with 45 patients in each group. The RSB group receives bilateral RSB with 15 ml of 0.4% ropivacaine on each side, while the placebo group receives an equal volume of 0.9% saline.

Interventions:

RSB Group: Bilateral RSB with 15 ml of 0.4% ropivacaine on each side. Placebo Group: Bilateral injection of 15 ml of 0.9% saline.

Outcome Measures:

Primary Outcome: Postoperative pain assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 30 minutes, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours postoperatively.

Secondary Outcomes: Opioid consumption, effective activations of the analgesia pump, time to mobilization, time to first passage of flatus, and length of hospital stay.

Hypothesis:

Preoperative ultrasound-guided bilateral RSB will significantly improve postoperative analgesia, reduce opioid consumption, and accelerate postoperative recovery.

Ethics Approval:

The study received approval from the Ethics Committee of Chengdu Jinjiang District Women \& Children Health Hospital (approval number: 202214).

Funding:

This study was supported by the Chengdu Medical Research Project (No. 2023465) and the Chengdu Medical Research Project (No. 2022548).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gynecological Laparoscopy Postoperative Pain Rectus Sheath Block

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
The study was designed as a double-blind trial, ensuring that neither the patients nor the operating surgeons were aware of the group allocations throughout the study. This blinding was critical to eliminate bias in treatment administration and outcome assessment, thereby enhancing the validity of the trial results.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ultrasound-Guided Rectus Sheath Block

Participants receive bilateral rectus sheath block with 15 ml of 0.4% ropivacaine on each side under ultrasound guidance

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Rectus Sheath Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Bilateral rectus sheath block performed under ultrasound guidance using 15 ml of 0.4% ropivacaine on each side

Placebo

articipants receive an equal volume of 0.9% saline as a placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Injection of 15 ml of 0.9% saline as a placebo under the same conditions as the experimental group.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Rectus Sheath Block

Bilateral rectus sheath block performed under ultrasound guidance using 15 ml of 0.4% ropivacaine on each side

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Placebo

Injection of 15 ml of 0.9% saline as a placebo under the same conditions as the experimental group.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aged 18 to 65 years
* Physical status classified as I or II according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)
* Surgical durations of less than 2 hours

Exclusion Criteria

* Infection at the planned puncture site
* Neurological disorders or nerve injuries
* Conversion to open surgery for various reasons during the procedure
* Coagulation abnormalities

Patients had the option to withdraw from the study at any time if they chose not to continue their participation.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chengdu Jinjiang Maternity and Child Health Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Fei Jia

Director of Anesthesiology Department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fei Jia, BS

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Chengdu Jinjiang District Women & Children Health Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chengdu Jinjiang District Women & Children Health Hospital

Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Zhang Y, Zhu Y. Comparison of conventional versus single port laparoscopy for surgical treatment of gynecological diseases: a pilot study. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2022 Mar;17(1):252-260. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.105823. Epub 2021 May 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35251414 (View on PubMed)

Wang J, Xu X, Xu J. Application of single-port procedure and ERAS management in the laparoscopic myomectomy. BMC Womens Health. 2023 Aug 1;23(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02550-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37528370 (View on PubMed)

Xu M, Feng Y, Song X, Fu S, Lu X, Lai J, Lu Y, Wang X, Lai R. Combined Ultrasound-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block with Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Analgesia After Total Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy: A Randomized, Controlled, and Prospective Study. Pain Ther. 2023 Apr;12(2):475-489. doi: 10.1007/s40122-023-00474-5. Epub 2023 Jan 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36648745 (View on PubMed)

Liang M, Xv X, Ren C, Yao Y, Gao X. Effect of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block with rectus sheath block on patients undergoing laparoscopy-assisted radical resection of rectal cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Mar 24;21(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01295-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33761901 (View on PubMed)

Chung W, Yoon Y, Kim JW, Kwon SI, Yang JB, Lee KH, Yoo HJ. Comparing two different techniques of rectus sheath block after single port laparoscopic surgery in benign adnexal mass patients: Surgical versus ultrasonography guidance-A randomized, single-blind, case-controlled study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Oct;217:29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.08.020. Epub 2017 Aug 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28843866 (View on PubMed)

Mugita M, Kawahara R, Tamai Y, Yamasaki K, Okuno S, Hanada R, Inaoka M, Funato T. Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block and rectus sheath block in pain control and recovery after gynecological transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2014;41(6):627-32.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25551952 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

202214

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.