Effect of Intrathecal Morphine on Quality of Recovery After Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery

NCT ID: NCT07322029

Last Updated: 2026-01-07

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 252 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2026-01-31
• Study Completion Date: 2027-03-31

Brief Summary

Minimally invasive gynecologic surgery has become the standard approach for the treatment of benign and malignant gynecologic diseases, offering the advantages of reduced surgical trauma and faster recovery. However, postoperative pain remains a major barrier to optimal recovery, with up to 40% of patients experiencing moderate to severe pain within the first 24 hours after laparoscopic procedures. Laparoscopic gynecologic surgery typically induces both somatic pain from abdominal wall incisions and visceral pain caused by peritoneal traction and pneumoperitoneum, making effective analgesia challenging. Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) is commonly used to control somatic incisional pain but provides limited relief of visceral pain, often resulting in increased opioid consumption and opioid-related adverse effects such as dizziness and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Intrathecal morphine (ITM) offers potent and long-lasting visceral analgesia with minimal systemic opioid requirements and has demonstrated safety and efficacy across multiple surgical settings. The complementary analgesic mechanisms of TAPB and intrathecal morphine suggest that their combination may enhance postoperative recovery by improving pain control while reducing opioid use.

The objective of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate whether the combination of intrathecal morphine and TAPB improves the quality of recovery after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery compared with TAPB alone. This study aims to provide high-quality clinical evidence to guide the development of an optimized multimodal analgesia strategy for patients undergoing minimally invasive gynecologic procedures.

Detailed Description

All patients will receive standardized general anesthesia combined with bilateral transversus abdominis plane block. The intervention group will additionally receive intrathecal morphine, whereas the control group will receive intrathecal saline. After entering the operating room, routine monitoring will include electrocardiography, pulse oximetry, noninvasive blood pressure, heart rate, and end-tidal carbon dioxide. Prior to anesthesia induction, patients in the intervention group will undergo lumbar intrathecal injection of morphine at the L3/4 or L4/5 or L5/S1 interspace. Based on previous literature and clinical experience, intrathecal morphine will be administered at a dose of 2 ug/kg. The control group will receive an equivalent volume of intrathecal normal saline under identical conditions.

General anesthesia will be induced with intravenous dexmedetomidine (0.5 ug/kg), Propofol (1.5-2 mg/kg), remifentanil (TCI 4 ng/mL), and rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg), followed by endotracheal intubation. Bilateral TAPB will be performed in all patients under ultrasound guidance. A total of 60 mL of diluted bupivacaine liposome (20 mL: 266 mg diluted to 60 mL with normal saline) will be administered, with 15 mL injected at each of the bilateral subcostal and lateral approaches (total 60 mL). Anesthesia maintenance will include 1.0-1.3 MAC desflurane, remifentanil, sufentanil, rocuronium, and vasoactive medications as required. Intraoperative opioid consumption will be recorded.

Postoperative analgesia will be provided using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), consisting of 100 mg morphine diluted to a total volume of 100 mL. The PCA settings will include no background dose, a 1-mL bolus dose, and a 6-minute lockout interval. In cases of adverse events such as hypotension, fluid resuscitation and vasoactive support will be provided, and PCA parameters may be reduced or discontinued by an independent nurse if necessary.

The primary outcome of this study is the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score at 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and other opioid-related adverse events. This trial aims to evaluate whether the combination of intrathecal morphine and TAPB provides superior analgesia and improves recovery after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.

Conditions

Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: QUADRUPLE

Study Groups

Intrathecal morphine group

Before anesthesia induction, patients in the intervention group received an intrathecal injection of morphine at the L3-4 or L4-5 or L5-S1 interspace. The intrathecal morphine dose was 2 μg/kg.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Intrathecal morphine group

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

With the patient in the lateral position, the puncture site was identified under ultrasound guidance. After local anesthesia, a spinal needle was advanced into the subarachnoid space, and intrathecal morphine was injected following confirmation of free cerebrospinal fluid flow.

TAPB

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

With the patient supine, a linear ultrasound probe was placed between the costal margin and iliac crest to identify the abdominal wall layers. Using an in-plane approach, a needle was advanced into the transversus abdominis plane, and after negative aspiration, liposomal bupivacaine was injected under direct ultrasound visualization. The block was performed bilaterally.

Normal saline group

Before anesthesia induction, patients in the control group received an intrathecal injection of an equal volume of preservative-free normal saline at the L3-4 or L4-5 or L5-S1 interspace.

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TAPB

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

With the patient supine, a linear ultrasound probe was placed between the costal margin and iliac crest to identify the abdominal wall layers. Using an in-plane approach, a needle was advanced into the transversus abdominis plane, and after negative aspiration, liposomal bupivacaine was injected under direct ultrasound visualization. The block was performed bilaterally.

Intrathecal saline injection

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

With the patient in the lateral position, the puncture site was identified under ultrasound guidance. After local anesthesia, a spinal needle was advanced into the subarachnoid space, and an equal volume of preservative-free normal saline was injected after confirming cerebrospinal fluid flow.

Interventions

TAPB

With the patient supine, a linear ultrasound probe was placed between the costal margin and iliac crest to identify the abdominal wall layers. Using an in-plane approach, a needle was advanced into the transversus abdominis plane, and after negative aspiration, liposomal bupivacaine was injected under direct ultrasound visualization. The block was performed bilaterally.

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Intrathecal morphine group

With the patient in the lateral position, the puncture site was identified under ultrasound guidance. After local anesthesia, a spinal needle was advanced into the subarachnoid space, and intrathecal morphine was injected following confirmation of free cerebrospinal fluid flow.

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

TAPB

With the patient supine, a linear ultrasound probe was placed between the costal margin and iliac crest to identify the abdominal wall layers. Using an in-plane approach, a needle was advanced into the transversus abdominis plane, and after negative aspiration, liposomal bupivacaine was injected under direct ultrasound visualization. The block was performed bilaterally.

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Intrathecal saline injection

With the patient in the lateral position, the puncture site was identified under ultrasound guidance. After local anesthesia, a spinal needle was advanced into the subarachnoid space, and an equal volume of preservative-free normal saline was injected after confirming cerebrospinal fluid flow.

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Female patients aged ≥18 years.
• Scheduled for elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery under general anesthesia.
• American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III.
• Able to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

• Contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia.
• Allergy to morphine or local anesthetics.
• Long-term opioid use (>20 morphine milligram equivalents per day).
• Baseline NRS pain score >3.
• Cognitive impairment or inability to cooperate.
• Emergency or non-elective surgery.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: FEMALE
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Sun Yat-sen University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

RenChun Lai

Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center

Guangdong, Guangzhou, China

Countries

China

Central Contacts

Renchun Lai, MD

Role: CONTACT

lairch@sysucc.org.cn

+8613660012343

Facility Contacts

Renchun Lai, MD

Role: primary

lairch@sysucc.org.cn

+8613660012343

Other Identifiers

2025-FXY-311

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id