Perioperative Outcomes of Common Methods of Minimally Invasive Contained Tissue Extraction

NCT ID: NCT02496130

Last Updated: 2019-01-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-04-30

Study Completion Date

2017-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this study is to compare common methods of tissue extraction at the time of minimally invasive surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The goal of this study is to compare common methods of tissue extraction at the time of minimally invasive surgery, including vaginal extraction and mini-laparotomy; both performed within a containment system. The primary aim is to assess return to normal daily activities after each of the surgical techniques. Return to daily activities will be recorded on a post-operative patient activity diary recording the following tasks: a) work (if applicable), b) domestic tasks, c) driving a vehicle (if applicable) and d) physical exercise (if applicable). Additional information regarding post-operative pain (measured on a Likert scale), potential complications of each technique, such as tearing of the bag or leakage, and peri- and post-operative outcomes will be collected. In order to aid in detection of leakage, blue dye (either indigo carmine or methylene blue) will be added to the containment bag prior to morcellation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hysterectomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

minilaparotomy

Subjects in this group will have tissue (uterus) extracted via mini-laparotomy incision with knife morcellation. Morcellation will be performed within a containment system. Method of extraction/group assignment will be determined clinically by the operating surgeon based on patient characteristics and patient preference.

No interventions assigned to this group

vaginal extraction

Subjects in this group will have tissue (uterus) extracted via vaginal extraction with knife morcellation. Morcellation will be performed within a containment system. Method of extraction/group assignment will be determined clinically by the operating surgeon based on patient characteristics and patient preference.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years of age or greater
* eligible to undergo laparoscopic Hysterectomy, as determined clinically by the operating surgeon

Exclusion Criteria

* suspected malignancy
* medical illness precluding laparoscopy
* inability to give informed consent
* allergy to indigo carmine or methylene blue dye
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Massachusetts General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Brigham and Women's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jon I. Einarsson

Chief, Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jon I Einarsson, MD, PhD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Brigham & Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Faulkner Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015P000230

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.