Disposable Energy Sources and Operating Room Time for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

NCT ID: NCT02065453

Last Updated: 2017-06-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

52 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Over 600,000 hysterectomies are performed each year nationwide. Over 99% of these are accomplished laparoscopically in the investigators current surgical practice to allow women a quicker recovery than a traditional large incision. Disposable laparoscopic devices have been developed to assist in the completion of hysterectomies. These disposable energy sources are only used once, but offer an improved safety and energy profile in that they reliably control bleeding with little damage to surrounding tissue and potentially save time. Reusable energy instruments can be sterilized and reused for multiple cases. Operating room time is expensive. The investigators calculate that if 6.7 minutes of time can be saved using the disposable device, Ligasure (Covidien), versus the reusable Robi bipolar and Storz Laparoscopic Shears, the time savings could justify the cost of the device.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This will be a randomized, prospective study. The investigators study design would have each patient serve as their own control. One side of the uterine attachments would be transected using the disposable device, Ligasure (Covidien), and the other using the two reusable devices (Robi bipolar and Storz laparoscopic shears). It is the investigators standard practice that the attending surgeon is on the patient's left side while the resident physician is on the patients right. To eliminate the bias of surgical experience, the investigators will randomize the energy source used on each side for every case. Therefore, the number of cases performed by the attending surgeon with the disposable or reusable energy sources, will equal that of the less experienced resident surgeon.

The primary endpoint of this study would be the time difference between cauterizing one side of the uterine attachments, from the round ligament to the uterine artery on one side, to the time detaching the same tissues on the other side. The vesico-uterine peritoneum or "bladder flap", will always be transected from the left for consistency. Sealed, opaque envelopes will be randomized to determine which side of the uterus will get the single disposable instrument, and which will get the 2 reusable instruments.

A time savings of 6.7 minutes for the total case can also be explained by a 3.35 minute time savings PER SIDE of the uterine attachments, given each uterus has two "sides". There is no pre-existing data on time needed for coagulation and cutting of the vascular tissues. Based on experience, the investigators estimate that it takes on average about 20 min total time for vessel sealing, with an estimated variability that approximately 70% of the time, vessel sealing is done within 35 minutes. Given these estimates, and using a power of 0.8, the sample size needed is 45.

The primary endpoint of surgical time will be initially assessed for each individual patient by determining the difference between the half of the laparoscopic hysterectomy procedure performed with the disposable device, specifically the Ligasure (Covidien) and the half of the laparoscopic hysterectomy procedure performed with the two reusable devices (Robi Bipolar and Storz laparoscopic shears) and determining if the mean difference score summed across all patients differs significantly from zero. Subsequent analyses will examine surgical times for attending physicians and residents separately where those using the disposable device are compared to those using the two reusable devices with independent students t test or the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test depending on the normality of the distributions. Parallel analyses will be performed for the secondary endpoint of estimated blood loss. Secondary endpoints of organ damage and other categorical intraoperative complications will be compared between the disposable and reusable device groups using chi-square and Fisher's Exact test.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Benign Uterine Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Disposable Device - Left & Reusable Devices - Right

One side of the uterine attachments would be transected using the disposable device (Ligasure, Covidien).

Group Type OTHER

disposable device (Ligasure, Covidien)

Intervention Type DEVICE

One side of the uterine attachments would be transected using the disposable device (Ligasure, Covidien). . We will randomize the side for each energy source used on each side for every case. The number of "sides" performed by the attending surgeon will equal that of the less experienced resident surgeon.

Reusable device

Intervention Type DEVICE

One side of the uterine attachments would be transected using the reusable Robi bipolar and Storz laparoscopic

Disposable Device - Right & Reusable Devices - Left

One side of the uterine attachments would be transected using the reusable Robi bipolar and Storz laparoscopic

Group Type OTHER

disposable device (Ligasure, Covidien)

Intervention Type DEVICE

One side of the uterine attachments would be transected using the disposable device (Ligasure, Covidien). . We will randomize the side for each energy source used on each side for every case. The number of "sides" performed by the attending surgeon will equal that of the less experienced resident surgeon.

Reusable device

Intervention Type DEVICE

One side of the uterine attachments would be transected using the reusable Robi bipolar and Storz laparoscopic

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

disposable device (Ligasure, Covidien)

One side of the uterine attachments would be transected using the disposable device (Ligasure, Covidien). . We will randomize the side for each energy source used on each side for every case. The number of "sides" performed by the attending surgeon will equal that of the less experienced resident surgeon.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Reusable device

One side of the uterine attachments would be transected using the reusable Robi bipolar and Storz laparoscopic

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

disposable device (Ligasure made by Covidien). Robi bipolar and Storz laparoscopic

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 21 to 80 years of age
* Scheduled for laparoscopic hysterectomy (prospectively)

Exclusion Criteria

* Under 21 years of age
* Known or anticipated malignancy
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

St. Louis University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mary Brigid Holloran-Schwartz, MD

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mary B Holloran-Schwartz, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

St. Louis University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Saint Louis University

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

22548

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.