Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
319 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-08-31
2014-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Total Versus Subtotal Hysterectomy:a Randomised, Prospective Multicentre Study of the Effect on Urinary, Sexual and Bowel Function
NCT00750035
Clinical Follow up After Subtotal and Total Hysterectomy
NCT02166749
Feasibility of a Trial of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Laparoscopic Sub-Total Hysterectomy
NCT01825915
Psychological Well-being, Recovery and Sexuality After Total and Subtotal Hysterectomy
NCT00876057
Urinary and Sexual Functions After Subtotal Versus Total Abdominal Hysterectomy
NCT03087565
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
the results up to 1 year after surgery have been published, links can be found in the citation list. The results from the 5 year follow up have not yet been published.
The questionnaire used in this trial consists of the validated SF-36 (Short Form 36) quality of life questionnaire as well as a thorough questionnaire regarding the outcome measures described elsewhere. The entire questionnaire was validated prior to the beginning of the trial.
A second questionnaire has been added in the 15 year follow up: PFDI-20(Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20). The investigators included this, as it is more thorough regarding pelvic organ prolapse and in particular a "bother" measure than the original questionnaire.
The 20 min. pad-weighing test has been tested against the 1 hour gold-standard used by the ICS (International Continence Society) and has been found to give comparable results.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Total hysterectomy
removal of the entire uterus including the cervix. open abdominal surgery. No specific procedures were asked of the surgeon. They were free to do the procedure the way they were used to doing it.
Total Hysterectomy
total abdominal hysterectomy where the body as well as the cervix of the uterus are removed.
Subtotal Hysterectomy
removal of the uterine body only leaving the cervix in situ. The surgeon was free to do the procedure as he was used to. The only direction was that the cervical canal should be electrocoagulated.
Subtotal hysterectomy
Subtotal abdominal hysterectomy where the body of the uterus is removed but the cervix is spared.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Subtotal hysterectomy
Subtotal abdominal hysterectomy where the body of the uterus is removed but the cervix is spared.
Total Hysterectomy
total abdominal hysterectomy where the body as well as the cervix of the uterus are removed.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* mental disease
* diabetes
* neurological disease
* not able to read and write Danish
* pelvic organ prolapse as the reason for hysterectomy
* prior surgery for urinary incontinence
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Southern Denmark
OTHER
Zealand University Hospital
OTHER
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
OTHER
Nykøbing Falster County Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lea Laird Andersen
MD, PhD.-student
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lea L Andersen, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Nykoebing Falster County Hospital
Helga ME Gimbel, Dr.med.sci.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Southern Denmark
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nykoebing Falster County Hospital
Nykoebing Falster, Region Sjælland, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gimbel H, Zobbe V, Ottesen BS, Tabor A. Randomized clinical trial of total vs. subtotal hysterectomy: validity of the trial questionnaire. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002 Oct;81(10):968-74. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2002.811012.x.
Gimbel H, Zobbe V, Andersen BJ, Sorensen HC, Toftager-Larsen K, Sidenius K, Moller N, Madsen EM, Vejtorp M, Clausen H, Rosgaard A, Villumsen J, Gluud C, Ottesen BS, Tabor A. Lower urinary tract symptoms after total and subtotal hysterectomy: results of a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005 Jul-Aug;16(4):257-62. doi: 10.1007/s00192-005-1291-8.
Gimbel H, Zobbe V, Andersen BM, Filtenborg T, Gluud C, Tabor A. Randomised controlled trial of total compared with subtotal hysterectomy with one-year follow up results. BJOG. 2003 Dec;110(12):1088-98.
Zobbe V, Gimbel H, Andersen BM, Filtenborg T, Jakobsen K, Sorensen HC, Toftager-Larsen K, Sidenius K, Moller N, Madsen EM, Vejtorp M, Clausen H, Rosgaard A, Gluud C, Ottesen BS, Tabor A. Sexuality after total vs. subtotal hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004 Feb;83(2):191-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00311.x.
Andersen LL, Moller LM, Gimbel HM. Low adherence to cervical cancer screening after subtotal hysterectomy. Dan Med J. 2015 Dec;62(12):A5165.
Andersen LL, Alling Moller LM, Gimbel HM. Objective comparison of subtotal vs. total abdominal hysterectomy regarding pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial with 14-year follow-up. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Oct;193:40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.033. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
Andersen LL, Moller LM, Gimbel H; Danish Hysterectomy Trial Group. Lower urinary tract symptoms after subtotal versus total abdominal hysterectomy: exploratory analyses from a randomized clinical trial with a 14-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Dec;26(12):1767-72. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2778-6. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
Andersen LL, Zobbe V, Ottesen B, Gluud C, Tabor A, Gimbel H; Danish Hysterectomy Trial Group. Five-year follow up of a randomised controlled trial comparing subtotal with total abdominal hysterectomy. BJOG. 2015 May;122(6):851-857. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12914. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
sj-268
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.