Hysterectomy for Benign Gynaecological Conditions With or Without Tubectomy

NCT ID: NCT02281487

Last Updated: 2017-05-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

105 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-07-31

Study Completion Date

2016-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a tubectomy during hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions does not result into a premature menopause.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

RATIONALE Recent studies in women at hereditary high risk to develop ovarian cancer indicate that high grade serous carcinomas arise from (ectopic and/or dysplastic) tubal epithelium. Historically, in pre-menopausal women undergoing a hysterectomy for benign indications (such as bleeding disorders, fibroids and adenomyosis) adnexa, including the Fallopian tubes, are left in situ. However, removing the tubes during a hysterectomy potentially prevents the development of serous ovarian carcinomas. Such a simple preventive procedure should avoid serious adverse effects of adnexectomy, like premature ovarian failure (POF).

STUDY DESIGN This is a randomized controlled trial in which patients undergoing a hysterectomy for benign indications will either be included into a group in which a standard hysterectomy (abdominal or laparoscopic) will be performed or into a group in which hysterectomy (abdominal or laparoscopic) will be combined with salpingectomy.The accrual is aimed to take until July 2015 and will be performed in the regular clinical setting.

STUDY POPULATION Women undergoing hysterectomy for benign conditions (fibroids, endosalpingiosis, bleeding disorders, etc) either abdominal or laparoscopic.

SAMPLE SIZE N=50/arm

TREATMENT Hysterectomy (abdominal or laparoscopic) with or without bilateral tubectomy.

METHODS

1. Study endpoint Main study endpoint: serum concentration Anti Mullerian Hormone (AMH) just before the operation and on average six months after the operation.

Secondary study endpoint: premalignant changes within the removed Fallopian tubes from this cohort of women, defined as histological dysplastic areas detected by light microscope
2. Randomization Randomization is performed online with Alea software.
3. Study procedures One day preoperative, together with regular blood drawing, blood for AMH concentration assessment is drawn. The operation procedure will either be the regular procedure or the regular procedure plus removal of the Fallopian tubes by removing the tubes from the ovaries by dissection of the mesovarium. On an expected average of six months after the operation blood for serum AMH concentration assessment is drawn. Blood serum is stored at -80C and AMH concentration assessment is performed in one badge.
4. Withdrawal of individual subjects Subjects can leave the study at any time for any reason if they wish to do so without any consequences. After withdrawal the individual subjects will be replaced.
5. Premature termination of the study In case of serious adverse events (like postoperative haemorrhage).

SAFETY REPORTING

1. In accordance to section 10, subsection 1, of the WMO, the investigator will inform the subjects and the reviewing accredited Medical Ethical Committee (METC) if anything occurs, on the basis of which it appears that the disadvantages of participation may be significantly greater than was foreseen in the research proposal. The study will be suspended pending further review by the accredited METC, except insofar as suspension would jeopardize the subjects' health. The investigator will take care that all subjects are kept informed.
2. Adverse and serious adverse events All Serious Adverse Event (SAE) s will be reported to the accredited METC that approved the protocol.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Data will both be described qualitatively and quantitatively. Student t-test will be applied to study differences in hormone levels between the groups.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

1. The study will be conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (2nd edition, 2009) and in accordance with the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO).
2. Patients will be recruited at the outpatient clinic when a decision is made for hysterectomy (abdominal or laparoscopic) on benign indication. They will receive oral information from their gynecologist and an information letter will be handed out (a telephone number will be stated which patients can call for extra information). On the day of preoperative admission (mostly one day preoperative) the gynecologist will answer any remaining questions and the informed consent will be signed by both the patient and the gynecologist. Patients on oral contraceptives will stop using these at least two weeks prior to the operation.
3. Literature on the effects of salpingectomy during hysterectomy for benign gynecological conditions on the ovarian reserve is very scant, but the one available study does not show any adverse effects. Furthermore, the chance of a postoperative hemorrhage is increased (estimated 1%). We believe that, in the light of the burden and risk, this study is justified since the prophylactic removal of the Fallopian tubes might diminish the risk of serous ovarian carcinomas (life time risk around 1%).

ADMINISTRATIVE ASPECTS AND PUBLICATION

1. Data will be collected from the participating hospitals by one study medical doctor. Together with the principal investigator (s)he has access to the source data which are coded by a case number. The key to the code is safeguarded in the safe from the TweeSteden hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands. Data and human material will be kept for seven years (or fifteen with patient consent). Data security is assured by the fact that one medical doctor collects the data. The privacy of the participants is protected by the fact that the data is coded.
2. The investigator will submit a summary of the progress of the trial to the accredited METC once a year. Information will be provided on the date of inclusion of the first subject, numbers of subjects included and numbers of subjects that have completed the trial, serious adverse events / serious adverse reactions, other problems, and amendments.
3. The investigator will notify the accredited METC of the end of the study within a period of 8 weeks. The end of the study is defined as the last patient's last visit. In case the study is ended prematurely, the investigator will notify the accredited METC, including the reasons for the premature termination. Within one year after the end of the study, the investigator will submit a final study report with the results of the study, including any publications/abstracts of the study, to the accredited METC.
4. The data will be published in peer reviewed medical journals as well as presented in abstracts at medical conferences.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Abdominal Hysterectomy (& Wertheim)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hysterectomy

standard hysterectomy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hysterectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

standard hysterectomy

Hysterectomy plus tubectomy

Hysterectomy plus tubectomy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Hysterectomy plus Tubectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

hysterectomy with tubectomy

light microscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

analysis of the incidence of dysplastic lesions (defined as: nuclear atypia, pilling of epithelial cells, multiple mitosis), if any, in the removed Fallopian tubes by light microscopy (Leica DM4000)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hysterectomy plus Tubectomy

hysterectomy with tubectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Hysterectomy

standard hysterectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

light microscopy

analysis of the incidence of dysplastic lesions (defined as: nuclear atypia, pilling of epithelial cells, multiple mitosis), if any, in the removed Fallopian tubes by light microscopy (Leica DM4000)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* hysterectomy (abdominally or laparoscopically) for benign indications
* premenopausal
* age \>36 \< 55

Exclusion Criteria

* history of cancer
* hereditary cancer in the family
* previous intraluminal tubal occlusion
* previous salpingitis
* failure to perform a tubectomy during hysterectomy
Minimum Eligible Age

36 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Radboud University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Gynaecologisch Oncologisch Centrum Zuid

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jurgen M.J. Piek

MD. PhD.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jurgen M Piek, MD. PhD.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Gynaecologisch Oncologisch Centrum Zuid

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Radboudumc

Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands

Site Status

Jeroen Bosch ziekenhuis

's-Hertogenbosch, North Brabant, Netherlands

Site Status

Catharina Ziekenhuis

Eindhoven, North Brabant, Netherlands

Site Status

Elisabeth ziekenhuis

Tilburg, North Brabant, Netherlands

Site Status

TweeStedenziekenhuis

Tilburg, North Brabant, Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Piek JM, van Diest PJ, Zweemer RP, Kenemans P, Verheijen RH. Tubal ligation and risk of ovarian cancer. Lancet. 2001 Sep 8;358(9284):844. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05992-X. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11570411 (View on PubMed)

Kurman RJ, Shih IeM. The origin and pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer: a proposed unifying theory. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 Mar;34(3):433-43. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181cf3d79.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20154587 (View on PubMed)

Crum CP. Intercepting pelvic cancer in the distal fallopian tube: theories and realities. Mol Oncol. 2009 Apr;3(2):165-70. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2009.01.004. Epub 2009 Feb 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19383378 (View on PubMed)

Sezik M, Ozkaya O, Demir F, Sezik HT, Kaya H. Total salpingectomy during abdominal hysterectomy: effects on ovarian reserve and ovarian stromal blood flow. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007 Dec;33(6):863-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00669.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18001455 (View on PubMed)

Narod SA, Sun P, Ghadirian P, Lynch H, Isaacs C, Garber J, Weber B, Karlan B, Fishman D, Rosen B, Tung N, Neuhausen SL. Tubal ligation and risk of ovarian cancer in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations: a case-control study. Lancet. 2001 May 12;357(9267):1467-70. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04642-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11377596 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL39317.028.12

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

HYSTUB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.