Clinical Follow up After Subtotal and Total Hysterectomy
NCT ID: NCT02166749
Last Updated: 2014-06-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
212 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
1997-03-31
2011-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods: From the original cohort of 212 patients 193 were sent a postal questionnaire in 1997 to find out possible symptoms related to hysterectomy. Again in 2011 a questionnaire based evaluation with a possibility of a clinical visit to study hospital was done for 153 patients. In the first evaluation a self-made questionnaire and in the second evaluation validated questionnaires were used. During a follow-up visit a clinical examination using also POP-Q-system was done. Additionally, hospital records of the patients were reviewed to find out subsequent operations after hysterectomy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Subtotal abdominal hysterectomy
107 women
Subtotal abdominal hysterectomy
Comparison of women undergoing subtotal abdominal hysterectomy (n=107) and women with total abdominal hysterectomy (n=105) a mean of 33 years ago.
Total abdominal hysterectomy
105 women
Subtotal abdominal hysterectomy
Comparison of women undergoing subtotal abdominal hysterectomy (n=107) and women with total abdominal hysterectomy (n=105) a mean of 33 years ago.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Subtotal abdominal hysterectomy
Comparison of women undergoing subtotal abdominal hysterectomy (n=107) and women with total abdominal hysterectomy (n=105) a mean of 33 years ago.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Turku University Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Seija Ala-Nissilä
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Juha Mäkinen, Professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Turku University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turku University Hospital
Turku, , Finland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ala-Nissila S, Haarala M, Jarvenpaa T, Makinen J. Long-term follow-up of the outcome of supracervical versus total abdominal hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Feb;28(2):299-306. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3143-0. Epub 2016 Sep 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ETMK:41/180/2010
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id