Effect of Recruitment Maneuvers Plus Optimal PEEP Versus Optimal PEEP Alone in One Lung Ventilation

NCT ID: NCT03635281

Last Updated: 2019-01-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-08-01

Study Completion Date

2018-10-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The intraoperative driving pressure (∆P) has been recently identified as the greater independent predictor of postoperative pulmonary complications after one lung ventilation (OLV). The application of a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level of 5 or 10 cmH2O has been shown to reduce the ∆P and the V/Q mismatch (Spadaro 2017); however, the "optimal" PEEP level able to minimize the ∆P may change significantly across patients. The aim of this study is to describe the optimal PEEP levels in patients undergoing thoracic surgery

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mechanical Ventilation Complication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PEEP group

In this group the a PEEP level will be added after 20 minutes from OLV. PEEP values will be chosen according to the best static compliance with an incremental trial (i.e. starting from ZEEP, the PEEP values will be increased in step of 2 cmH2O each until the best compliance is reached)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

incremental PEEP

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In this group the a PEEP level will be added after 20 minutes from OLV. PEEP values will be chosen according to the best static compliance with an incremental trial (i.e. starting from ZEEP, the PEEP values will be increased in step of 2 cmH2O each until the best compliance is reached

RM+PEEP group

Recruitment maneuvers will be performed as follow Recruitment maneuvers

1. set FIO2 at 1.0
2. Ppeak limit at 45 cmH2O
3. Respiratory rate set at 6
4. I:E set at 1:1
5. Raise the VT at step of 2 ml/kg PBW until the Pplat is between 30-40 cmH2O
6. If the maximum VT is set without rasing the Pplat, raise PEEP
7. Allow three respiratory cycles with Pplat between 30 and 40 cmH2O
8. End of RM

The recruitment manouvers will be performed after 20 minutes of OLV. At the end of the RM, the VT will be set back to 5 ml/kg while the PEEP will be chosen according to the best static compliance with a decremental trial (from 16 cmH2O, lowering PEEP with steps of 2 cmH2O each until the best compliance is reached).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Recruitment manoeuvers

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Recruitment manoeuvers will be performed as follow Recruitment manoeuvers

1. set FIO2 at 1.0
2. Ppeak limit at 45 cmH2O
3. Respiratory rate set at 6
4. I:E set at 1:1
5. Raise the VT at step of 2 ml/kg PBW until the Pplat is between 30-40 cmH2O
6. If the maximum VT is set without rasing the Pplat, raise PEEP
7. Allow three respiratory cycles with Pplat between 30 and 40 cmH2O
8. End of RM

The recruitment manouvers will be performed after 20 minutes of OLV. At the end of the RM, the VT will be set back to 5 ml/kg while the PEEP will be chosen according to the best static compliance with a decremental trial (from 16 cmH2O, lowering PEEP with steps of 2 cmH2O each until the best compliance is reached).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Recruitment manoeuvers

Recruitment manoeuvers will be performed as follow Recruitment manoeuvers

1. set FIO2 at 1.0
2. Ppeak limit at 45 cmH2O
3. Respiratory rate set at 6
4. I:E set at 1:1
5. Raise the VT at step of 2 ml/kg PBW until the Pplat is between 30-40 cmH2O
6. If the maximum VT is set without rasing the Pplat, raise PEEP
7. Allow three respiratory cycles with Pplat between 30 and 40 cmH2O
8. End of RM

The recruitment manouvers will be performed after 20 minutes of OLV. At the end of the RM, the VT will be set back to 5 ml/kg while the PEEP will be chosen according to the best static compliance with a decremental trial (from 16 cmH2O, lowering PEEP with steps of 2 cmH2O each until the best compliance is reached).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

incremental PEEP

In this group the a PEEP level will be added after 20 minutes from OLV. PEEP values will be chosen according to the best static compliance with an incremental trial (i.e. starting from ZEEP, the PEEP values will be increased in step of 2 cmH2O each until the best compliance is reached

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients undergoing VATS with OLV ≥2 hours

Exclusion Criteria

* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification) score ≥ 4
* severe chronic respiratory failure (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with GOLD stage 3 or 4
* preoperative hemoglobin less than 10 g ml-1
* hemodynamic instability (defined as a decrease in systolic arterial pressure of more than 20% from baseline),
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Università degli Studi di Ferrara

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Savino Spadaro

Professor, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Università di Ferrara

Ferrara, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Spadaro S, Grasso S, Karbing DS, Fogagnolo A, Contoli M, Bollini G, Ragazzi R, Cinnella G, Verri M, Cavallesco NG, Rees SE, Volta CA. Physiologic Evaluation of Ventilation Perfusion Mismatch and Respiratory Mechanics at Different Positive End-expiratory Pressure in Patients Undergoing Protective One-lung Ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2018 Mar;128(3):531-538. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002011.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29215365 (View on PubMed)

Spadaro S, Grasso S, Karbing DS, Santoro G, Cavallesco G, Maniscalco P, Murgolo F, Di Mussi R, Ragazzi R, Rees SE, Volta CA, Fogagnolo A. Physiological effects of two driving pressure-based methods to set positive end-expiratory pressure during one lung ventilation. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Oct;35(5):1149-1157. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00582-z. Epub 2020 Aug 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32816177 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OLVRM

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Trans-pulmonary Pressure in ARDS
NCT02416037 COMPLETED NA