Individualized Perioperative Open-Lung Ventilatory Strategy During One-Lung Ventilation

NCT ID: NCT03182062

Last Updated: 2018-10-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1400 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-09-08

Study Completion Date

2020-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether individualized ventilatory management during one-lung ventilation in patients scheduled for thoracic surgery, combining the use of low tidal volumes, alveolar recruitment maneuvers, individually titrated positive end-expiratory pressure and individually indicated ventilatory support will decrease postoperative pulmonary complications, ICU and hospital length of stay compared to a standardized Lung Protective Ventilation (LPV).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Thoraric Surgery Surgery Time Expected More Than Two Hours

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

OLA-iHFNC

Intraoperatively ventilated patients with a tidal volume (VT) of 5-6ml / kg of ideal body weight and respiratory rate to maintain normal carbon dioxide. After intubation, in all patients will be performed an alveolar recruitment maneuver (MRA) and a PEEP titration trial (see Calculation of optimal PEEP). Every 40 minutes will be assessed the need to adjust the level of PEEP by evaluating the dynamic compliance of the respiratory system (Crs). Faced with a decline in Crs\> 10% a new MRA and optimal PEEP setting will be assessed.

Postoperatively, high flow oxygen therapy will be individually indicated by evaluating peripheral oxygen saturation.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Alveolar recruitment maneuver

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

To start the Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver (ARM) the ventilatory mode will be changed to pressure-controlled mode (PCV) with 20 cmH2O pressure control ventilation. A respiratory rate (RR) of 15 rpm, inspiration: expiration ratio of 1:1, FiO2 of 0.8 and PEEP of 5 cmH2O. The PEEP level will be increased in 5 cmH2O steps every 10 respiratory cycles, increasing to 15 cycles in the last level of PEEP (20 cmH2O), getting an opening pressure at 40 cmH2O airway (duration of the maneuver: 160 sec.)

PEEP Titration Trial

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The ventilation mode will then switch back to volume controlled ventilation with the same baseline settings but with 20 cmH2O PEEP level. Then PEEP will be reduced in 2 cmH2O steps each maintained for 5 breaths the level of PEEP with the best (higher) dynamic compliance.

STD-O2

Intraoperatively ventilated patients with a tidal volume of 5-6 ml / kg of ideal body weightand respiratory rate to maintain normal carbon dioxide, PEEP 5 cmH2O. In this group no recruitment maneuvers or optimal PEEP setting will be performed.

Postoperatively, standard oxygen therapy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lung protective ventilation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ventilatory strategy with a PEEP level of 5 cmH2O but without recruitment maneuvers and PEEP titration trial.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Alveolar recruitment maneuver

To start the Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver (ARM) the ventilatory mode will be changed to pressure-controlled mode (PCV) with 20 cmH2O pressure control ventilation. A respiratory rate (RR) of 15 rpm, inspiration: expiration ratio of 1:1, FiO2 of 0.8 and PEEP of 5 cmH2O. The PEEP level will be increased in 5 cmH2O steps every 10 respiratory cycles, increasing to 15 cycles in the last level of PEEP (20 cmH2O), getting an opening pressure at 40 cmH2O airway (duration of the maneuver: 160 sec.)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

PEEP Titration Trial

The ventilation mode will then switch back to volume controlled ventilation with the same baseline settings but with 20 cmH2O PEEP level. Then PEEP will be reduced in 2 cmH2O steps each maintained for 5 breaths the level of PEEP with the best (higher) dynamic compliance.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Lung protective ventilation

Ventilatory strategy with a PEEP level of 5 cmH2O but without recruitment maneuvers and PEEP titration trial.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Planned thoracic surgery \> 2 hours.
* Signed informed consent for participation in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Age less than 18 years.
* Pregnant or breast-feeding.
* Patients with BMI \>35.
* Syndrome of moderate or severe respiratory distress: PaO2/FiO2 \< 200 mmHg.
* Heart failure: NYHA IV.
* Hemodynamic failure: CI \<2.5 L/min/m2 and / or requirements before surgery ionotropic support.
* Diagnosis or suspicion of intracranial hypertension (intracranial pressure\> 15 mmHg).
* Mechanical ventilation in the last 15 days.
* Presence of pneumothorax. Presence of giant bullae on chest radiography or computed tomography (CT).
* Patient with preoperatively CPAP.
* Participation in another experimental protocol at the time of intervention selection.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fundación para la Investigación del Hospital Clínico de Valencia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Carlos Ferrando

Principal Investigador

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Javier Belda, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care; Hospital Clinico Universitario

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol

Badalona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Hospital Gregorio Marañón

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Hospital clínico universitario

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Carlos Ferrando, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

609892732

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jaume Canet, MD, PhD

Role: primary

Carmen Unzueta, MD, PhD

Role: primary

Ignacio Garutti

Role: primary

Carlos Ferrando, MD, PhD

Role: primary

609892732

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ferrando C, Mugarra A, Gutierrez A, Carbonell JA, Garcia M, Soro M, Tusman G, Belda FJ. Setting individualized positive end-expiratory pressure level with a positive end-expiratory pressure decrement trial after a recruitment maneuver improves oxygenation and lung mechanics during one-lung ventilation. Anesth Analg. 2014 Mar;118(3):657-65. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000105.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24557111 (View on PubMed)

Fleisher LA, Linde-Zwirble WT. Incidence, outcome, and attributable resource use associated with pulmonary and cardiac complications after major small and large bowel procedures. Perioper Med (Lond). 2014 Oct 7;3:7. doi: 10.1186/2047-0525-3-7. eCollection 2014.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25313335 (View on PubMed)

Licker MJ, Widikker I, Robert J, Frey JG, Spiliopoulos A, Ellenberger C, Schweizer A, Tschopp JM. Operative mortality and respiratory complications after lung resection for cancer: impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and time trends. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 May;81(5):1830-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.11.048.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16631680 (View on PubMed)

Zorrilla-Vaca A, Barbeta E, Librero J, Ferrando C; iPROVE-OLV Research Network Group. Open-lung ventilation and mechanical power in thoracic surgery: Post hoc analysis of a multicentre randomised trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002271. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40905246 (View on PubMed)

Mazzinari G, Diaz-Cambronero O, Garutti I, Errando CL, Ferrando C; iPROVE-OLV investigators. Impact of neuromuscular block monitoring and reversal on postoperative pulmonary complications in thoracic surgery: a Bayesian analysis of the iPROVE-OLV trial. Br J Anaesth. 2025 Jan 31:S0007-0912(24)00769-4. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.11.041. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39893063 (View on PubMed)

Ferrando C, Carraminana A, Pineiro P, Mirabella L, Spadaro S, Librero J, Ramasco F, Scaramuzzo G, Cervantes O, Garutti I, Parera A, Argilaga M, Herranz G, Unzueta C, Vives M, Regi K, Costa-Reverte M, Sonsoles Leal M, Nieves-Alonso J, Garcia E, Rodriguez-Perez A, Farina R, Cabrera S, Guerra E, Gallego-Ligorit L, Herrero-Izquierdo A, Valles-Torres J, Ramos S, Lopez-Herrera D, De La Matta M, Gokhan S, Kucur E, Mugarra A, Soro M, Garcia L, Sastre JA, Aguirre P, Salazar CJ, Ramos MC, Morocho DR, Trespalacios R, Ezequiel-Fernandez F, Lamanna A, Pia Cantatore L, Laforgia D, Bellas S, Lopez C, Navarro-Ripoll R, Martinez S, Vallverdu J, Jacas A, Yepes-Temino MJ, Belda FJ, Tusman G, Suarez-Sipmann F, Villar J; iPROVE-OLV Research Network Group. Individualised, perioperative open-lung ventilation strategy during one-lung ventilation (iPROVE-OLV): a multicentre, randomised, controlled clinical trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2024 Mar;12(3):195-206. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00346-6. Epub 2023 Dec 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38065200 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

iPROVE-OLV

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Protective Ventilation Strategy
NCT03234621 COMPLETED NA