Fluid Responsiveness Predicted by a Stepwise PEEP Elevation Recruitment Maneuver in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-12-01

Study Completion Date

2019-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hemodynamic and fluid optimization during perioperative period can reduce postoperative morbidity. The assessment of preload and determination of whether the patient is fluid responsive is still challenging. Static preload indices such as central venous pressure are not accurate to assess fluid responsiveness contrary to dynamic preload indices such as pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume (SV) variation. However, such indices suffer from several limitations and should be used under strict conditions. Alternative dynamic methods such as lung recruitment maneuvers (LRM) have been developed LRM can be used to reopen or prevent collapsed lung under mechanical ventilation so as to decrease respiratory complications. LRM induces a transient increase in intra-thoracic pressure and decreases in venous return, leading to a decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic area and stroke volume. Several studies have shown that the PEEP-induced decrease in stroke volume is related to pre-existing preload responsiveness. Few studies have also shown that LRM can represent a functional test to predict fluid responsiveness. However, monitoring stroke volume during LRM to assess fluid responsiveness is costly, and cardiac output devices may not be reliable. In this context, central venous pressure (CVP) or systemic arterial parameters monitoring are easily accessible and inexpensive during major surgery.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Assessment of Preload Dependency Via Measurement of Peripheral Venous Pressure During an Alveolar Recruitment Manoeuvre

NCT05026255

Intensive Care Patients

TERMINATED NA

Changes of Pulse Pressure Variation Duing Tidal Volume Challenge in Patients With Spontaneous Breathing

NCT04369027

Hemodynamic Monitoring

UNKNOWN

Use of Heart-lung Interaction to Predict Haemodynamic Tolerance to the Open Lung Approach With Individualised PEEP

NCT06123039

Anesthesia Perioperative/Postoperative Complications Hypovolemia +1 more

COMPLETED

Effect of Recruitment Maneuvers Plus Optimal PEEP Versus Optimal PEEP Alone in One Lung Ventilation

NCT03635281

Mechanical Ventilation Complication

COMPLETED NA

Comparison of Esophageal and Central Venous Pressure for Estimating Transpulmonary Pressure Changes

NCT04443491

Mechanical Ventilation Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

COMPLETED

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aims of the current study were

1. to assess the ability of a LRM with a stepwise increase of PEEP to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients,
2. to identify the best criteria for fluid responsiveness prediction between variations of systolic aortic pressure (SAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), diastolic aortic pressure (DAP), pulse pressure (PP) and central venous pressure (CVP),
3. to compare the ability of these criteria with pulse pressure variation (PPV) to predict fluid responsiveness

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mechanical Ventilation Respiration, Artificial

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intensive care

Patients admitted in the intensive care unit of the University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, France between December 2018 and July 2019

Lung recruitment maneuver

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Lung recruitment maneuver is used to reopen or prevent collapsed lung under mechanical ventilation so as to decrease respiratory complications. LRM induces a transient increase in intra-thoracic pressure and decreases in venous return, leading to a decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic area and stroke volume.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lung recruitment maneuver

Lung recruitment maneuver is used to reopen or prevent collapsed lung under mechanical ventilation so as to decrease respiratory complications. LRM induces a transient increase in intra-thoracic pressure and decreases in venous return, leading to a decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic area and stroke volume.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* needing invasive arterial blood pressure and pulse contour analysis (PICCO system) for cardiac output measurement,
* central venous pressure monitoring,
* using of protective mechanical ventilation
* Indication for fluid expansion
* Admitted in the intensive care unit of CHU of St ETienne