Impact of Antioxidant Treatment on DNA Fragmentation Index
NCT ID: NCT03466229
Last Updated: 2018-03-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
79 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-07-01
2016-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Level of DNA-fragmentation Before and After Antioxidant-based Therapies in Male Infertility
NCT06050031
Oxidative Stress In Semen And Male Infertility
NCT03464656
Effect of Natural Antioxidant Supplement on Sperm DNA Fragmentation
NCT03646825
Male Supplements for Sperm Quality and Aging
NCT06339996
Administration of Antioxidants to Infertile Men and Sperm Quality
NCT04256278
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although there is limited access to reliable diagnostic methods, it is assumed that in at least 50% of all cases 'male subfertility' is a contributing or the main cause of the infertility of the couple. The gold standard in assessment of male reproductive function is standard semen analysis including evaluation of sperm number, motility and morphology. Although efforts have been made in to improve and standardise the methodology for semen analysis, there are no well established cut off levels for sperm concentration, motility or morphology which accurately predict the chance of pregnancy or indicate which assisted reproductive technique (ART) - the most frequent therapy for infertility- will ultimately be the most effective. This lack of diagnostic tools is not only hampering proper management of infertility but also represents a serious limitation in relation to the understanding of biological underpinnings of the disorder and as a consequence, the development of cause related treatment modalities.
Although various novel alternative methods of assessing semen quality have been developed, so far, none have contributed to or altered our clinical approach to the treatment of infertile couples. During the passed two decades a lot of attention has been paid to impairment of sperm DNA integrity as a possible cause of male subfertility. There are different techniques currently available for the assessment of sperm DNA integrity e.g. Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA®), Comet, TUNEL and sperm chromatin dispersion test. Generally, the use of these tests has shown an increased proportion of sperm with fragmented DNA structure among subfertile men as compared to proven fertile or men from general population. Although measuring different characteristics of the status of sperm DNA (e.g. presence of single and double strand breaks, propensity to damage and probable cause of the fragmentation), comparisons of the results obtained with two or more of these tests show a correlation coefficient of a magnitude 0.4 to 0.6, indicating that, although not completely overlapping, the tests to a certain extent assess some of the same characteristics of sperm DNA. Another interesting finding is that there is only a weak to moderate correlation between standard sperm parameters and measures of DNA integrity, the level of association (correlation coefficient \~ 0.6) the most pronounced being for motility. This means that assessment of sperm chromatin integrity adds to the information obtained by standard semen analysis.
The most appraised, standardised and studied of the sperm nDNA tests is the SCSA® which is based on a very well defined protocol for handling of samples and subsequent data analysis. The robustness of the techniques was exemplified by a comparison of the SCSA® analysis of almost 200 samples results performed by two independent laboratories which found a correlation coefficient of 0.9 with mean difference between the DNA Fragmentation Index (DFI) results of about 1%. A further advantage of the SCSA® method over the remaining assessment techniques is the relatively large number of studies that have utilised the technique in clinical settings constituting a considerable record of the method's performance in predicting fertility outcome.
Briefly, these data indicate that the chance of spontaneous pregnancy decreases at DFI levels above 20% and approaches zero if DFI exceeds 30%. This is also true for Intrauterine insemination (IUI). However, it seems that even spermatozoa from samples with high DFI can be used for in vitro fertilisation by standard IVF or ICSI, with some data suggesting that ICSI might actually be more efficient using samples with high (\>30%) DFI. A finding, which may at first appear paradoxical but may be a reflection of the relative probability of fortuitously selecting a sperm with intact DNA. The data regarding fertilisation rate, embryo quality and risk of miscarriage in relation to DFI are also conflicting.
The biological mechanisms responsible for DNA strand breaks and other types of impairment of sperm DNA integrity are not completely known. Amongst others incomplete DNA repair during spermiogenesis, abortive apoptosis and/or increased level of oxidative stress have been suggested as possible options .
The overall aim of this project is to evaluate effect of restoring oxidant balance using Androferti, (Q Pharma Laboratories; Alicante, Spain) on sperm DNA integrity in subfertile men with high level of DFI.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Antioxidant
Androferti - 1 twice per day
Androferti
Placebo
Placebo - 1 twice per day
Placebo
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Androferti
Placebo
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age: 18-50 years,
3. Non-smoking,
4. Sperm DNA Fragmentation Index \>25%
Exclusion Criteria
2. FSH outside the normal range of 2-8 IU/L,g)
3. LH outside the normal range of 2-10 IU/L,
4. T \< 10nmol/L
5. Treated with antihypertensive drugs, hormones, statins, psychotropic drugs, or oral cortisone for the last six months,
6. History of anabolic steroids use,
7. Taking antioxidant supplementation the last six months.
18 Years
50 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Q-Pharma
UNKNOWN
Octean
UNKNOWN
Region Skane
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Aleksander Giwercman
Professor
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Stenqvist A, Oleszczuk K, Leijonhufvud I, Giwercman A. Impact of antioxidant treatment on DNA fragmentation index: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial. Andrology. 2018 Nov;6(6):811-816. doi: 10.1111/andr.12547. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Androferti
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.