Repeated Sweet Consumption and Subsequent Sweet Food Preferences and Intake

NCT ID: NCT03427658

Last Updated: 2024-05-16

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-02-12

Study Completion Date

2019-08-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will assess the impact of repeated sweet versus non-sweet food consumption on subsequent sweet and non-sweet food preferences and intakes

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Participants will be randomized to receive instructions to either increase or decrease sweet food consumption for 6 days, and impacts on food preferences and intakes will be assessed at baseline and after 1 week. Preferences for sweet and non-sweet foods will be assessed during two taste tests at each assessment time, where six different foods will be rated. Sweet and non-sweet food consumption will also be measured at two meals at each assessment time - breakfast and lunch. Identical buffet meals composed of sweet and non-sweet foods suitable for consumption at breakfast and lunch will be provided ad-libitum.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Repeated Sweet Food Consumption

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors
Intervention allocation will be undertaken by a researcher not in direct contact with any one participant, following randomization by drawing lots.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Increase sweet food consumption

Participants are asked to increase their consumption of sweet foods throughout their diet. Participants will be supported through an individual dietary interview where sweet foods will be highlighted and additional sweet food consumption recommended.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sweet food consumption

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Comparison of the impacts of sweet and non-sweet food consumption

Decrease sweet food consumption

Participants are asked to decrease their consumption of sweet foods throughout their diet. Participants will be supported through an individual dietary interview where sweet foods will be highlighted and substitutions for sweet food consumption will be recommended.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sweet food consumption

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Comparison of the impacts of sweet and non-sweet food consumption

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sweet food consumption

Comparison of the impacts of sweet and non-sweet food consumption

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* No known food allergy
* No known taste or appetite allergies
* Non-smokers
* Do not habitually consume exclusively / almost exclusively a sweet or non-sweet diet
* Able to provide consent and complete all study measures

Race / ethnicity will not be requested.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Bristol

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bournemouth University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Peter Rogers, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Bristol

Katherine Appleton, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Bournemouth University, UK

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Bristol

Bristol, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PRKA2018

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Eating Behaviors in Shift Workers
NCT04468672 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Effect of Liking on Fruit Intake
NCT00580541 COMPLETED NA
Food Form & Energy Intake
NCT05258097 UNKNOWN