Repeated Sweet Breakfasts and Subsequent Sweet Food Preferences and Intakes

NCT ID: NCT03442829

Last Updated: 2020-09-23

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

54 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-02-23

Study Completion Date

2020-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will assess the impact of repeated sweet breakfast consumption versus repeated non-sweet breakfast consumption on subsequent sweet and non-sweet food preferences and intakes

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Participants will be randomized to receive either sweet or non-sweet breakfasts for three consecutive weeks, and impacts on food preferences and intakes will be assessed at baseline (day 0), after 1 week (day 7), and after three weeks (day 21). Preferences for sweet and non-sweet foods will be assessed during two taste tests at each assessment time, where six different foods will be rated. Sweet and non-sweet food consumption will also be measured at two meals at each assessment time - breakfast and lunch. Identical buffet meals composed of sweet and non-sweet foods suitable for consumption at breakfast and lunch will be provided ad-libitum. Intervention breakfasts will only be consumed on the days between test days.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Repeated Sweet Food Consumption

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors
Intervention allocation will be undertaken by a researcher not directly involved with participants following randomization by drawing lots.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sweet food consumption

Sweet breakfasts. Participants are asked to consume a sweet breakfast every day for three weeks (excepting on three days when outcomes will be assessed (days 0, 7 and 21, day 21 reported). All foods will be provided.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sweet food consumption

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Sweet food consumption at breakfast

Non-sweet food consumption

Non-sweet breakfasts. Participants are asked to consume a non-sweet breakfast every day for three weeks (excepting on three days when outcomes will be assessed (days 0, 7 and 21, day 21 reported). All foods will be provided.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Non-sweet food consumption

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Non-sweet food consumption at breakfast

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sweet food consumption

Sweet food consumption at breakfast

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Non-sweet food consumption

Non-sweet food consumption at breakfast

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* No known food allergy
* No known taste or appetite abnormalities
* Non-smoker
* Habitually eats breakfast
* Able to provide consent and complete all study measures
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Bristol

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bournemouth University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Katherine Appleton, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Bournemouth University, UK

Peter Rogers, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Bristol

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bournemouth University

Bournemouth, US and Canada Only, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KAPR2018

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Foods Within a Meal and Food Liking Study
NCT03783507 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
The Meal Time Study
NCT03305237 COMPLETED NA
Eating Behaviors in Shift Workers
NCT04468672 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
The Effect of Portion Sizes on Mood
NCT01725425 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA