Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
441 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-11-24
2014-01-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Provision of Small vs. Large Portion Sizes and Later Food Intake
NCT03241576
Introduction of an Enriched Evening Meal on the Feeding Behavior of Institutionalized Residents
NCT02329613
Message Framing and Policy Support for Front-of-package Labeling
NCT06296342
Using the Norm Range to Predict the Effect of Food Portion Size Reductions on Compensation Over 5 Days
NCT03811210
FOP Nutrition Label in Campus Cafeteria
NCT03336151
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective: To determine how to express portion sizes and time frame for Food Based Dietary Guidelines (FBDG) using the feedback of dietitians.
Design: Data were obtained from an internet-based survey of 441 French dieticians (collected from November 24, 2013 through January 2, 2014).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Less experienced dietitians
There was no intervention, but we conducted separate analyses to identify differences according to the level of experience of the dietician. We used the median number of years of professional experience (median=8) to split the sample and create two subgroups: 1) less experienced dieticians (less than 9 years of experience; n= 225)
there was no intervention, only separate analyses
We only conducted separate analyses to see if responses differed according to level of experience.
More experienced dietitians
and 2) more experienced dieticians (9 years of experience or more; n=215).
there was no intervention, only separate analyses
We only conducted separate analyses to see if responses differed according to level of experience.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
there was no intervention, only separate analyses
We only conducted separate analyses to see if responses differed according to level of experience.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Members of the AFDN who have completed the online questionnaire were retained for analysis (n= 441).
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Grenoble Ecole de Management
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GrenobleEM
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.