Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Faecal Incontinence - Placebo or Clinical Effective
NCT ID: NCT03261622
Last Updated: 2023-11-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
73 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-11-01
2020-11-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In a selected patient group we have evidence that 90% of patients will have a successful test period (≥50% reduction in incontinence episodes). If preoperative there is motor response on at least 3 out of 4 poles on the lead, at a threshold ≤1.5 mAMP.
Hypotheses In a selected patient group suffering from faecal incontinence a one-stage permanent implant will be possible. The functional results will be improved as more time can be spent finding the optimal pacemaker settings as the risk of infection is reduced compared to the stage implant. One-Stage implantation gives the opportunity to test the amount of placebo effect with SNS.
During the first 3 months postoperative patients will be randomized to either stimulation amplitude set at 90% of sensory threshold (control group) or 3 periods of stimulation at 0.05v (placebo), 50% and 90% of sensory threshold. Patients are randomized in a 1 to 2 pattern. After the initial 3 months the stimulation amplitude is increased to sensory threshold. After six months the project ends and the number of patients achieving the 50% improvement in incontinence episodes are evaluated.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of Sacral Nerve Stimulation Before Definitive Implantation
NCT00522691
Improving the Efficacy of Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Fecal Incontinence by Alteration of Stimulation Parameters
NCT01254695
Comparison of Sacral Nerve Modulation and Pudendal Nerve Stimulation in Treatment of Fecal Incontinence
NCT01069016
Dose Response Curve - Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Faecal Incontinence
NCT01130870
Treatment of Faecal Incontinence With Sacral Nerve Stimulation - Improved Function With Stimulation Bilaterally?
NCT00913601
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The SNS therapy has traditionally been applied as a two step procedure. Firstly, a 3-4 week test-period, often with a permanent electrode with tines, followed by permanent implantation if at least a 50% symptom reduction has been obtained during the test stimulation.
In a selected patient group(idiopathic faecal incontinence or incontinence as a result of an external anal sphincter tear (\<160 degrees)) we have evidence that 90% of patients will have a successful test period (≥50% reduction in incontinence episodes). If preoperative there is motor response on at least 3 out of 4 poles on the lead, at a threshold ≤1.5 mAMP(unpublished data, submitted for publication) .
Thus, only 10% of the patients have the lead explanted after 3 to 4 weeks. In 90% of the patients a pacemaker is implanted after the test period, these patients will have an additional operation that could have been avoided if they had the permanent pacemaker implanted at the first stage.
Hypotheses In a selected patient group suffering from faecal incontinence a one-stage permanent implant will be possible. The functional results will be improved as more time can be spent finding the optimal pacemaker settings as the risk of infection is reduced compared to the stage implant. One-Stage implantation gives the opportunity to test the amount of placebo effect with SNS.
During the first 3 months postoperative patients will be randomized to either stimulation amplitude set at 90% of sensory threshold (control group) or 3 periods of stimulation at 0.05v (placebo), 50% and 90% of sensory threshold. Patients are randomized. After the initial 3 months the stimulation amplitude is increased to sensory threshold. After six months the project ends and the number of patients achieving the 50% improvement in incontinence episodes are evaluated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
BASIC_SCIENCE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control arm
Stimulation amplitude at 90% of sensory threshold during period 1 to 3. (each period 4 weeks)
Sacral nerve stimulation at different stimulation amplitudes
Exploring the effect of different stimulation amplitude in a randomized study
Intervention arm
Alternation of stimulation amplitude
1. Period - Stimulation amplitude 0.05 Volts (lowest possible)
2. Period - Stimulation amplitude - 50% of sensory threshold.
3. Period - Stimulation amplitude - 90% of sensory threshold.
Sacral nerve stimulation at different stimulation amplitudes
Exploring the effect of different stimulation amplitude in a randomized study
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sacral nerve stimulation at different stimulation amplitudes
Exploring the effect of different stimulation amplitude in a randomized study
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Informed consent
* Idiopathic faecal incontinence or incontinence following external sphincter tear ≤ 160 degrees.
* ≥ one faecal incontinence episode after optimized conservative treatment.
* Ability to use the patient programmer.
Exclusion Criteria
* Diabetes
* Neurological diseases, including spinal cord injuries
* Pelvic irradiation
* Rectal resections
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Tromso
OTHER
Hvidovre University Hospital
OTHER
University of Aarhus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jakob Jakobsen
Principal Investigator (M.D. Ph.D.)
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jakob K. Jakobsen, MD. Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Anal Physiology Laboratory, Surgical Research Section 900, Aarhus University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Anal Physiology Laboratory, Surgical Research Section 900, Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, Aarhus C, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
005
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.