Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Faecal Incontinence - Placebo or Clinical Effective

NCT ID: NCT03261622

Last Updated: 2023-11-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

73 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-11-01

Study Completion Date

2020-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has over the last 20 years been recognised as an efficient treatment option for faecal incontinence (FI).

In a selected patient group we have evidence that 90% of patients will have a successful test period (≥50% reduction in incontinence episodes). If preoperative there is motor response on at least 3 out of 4 poles on the lead, at a threshold ≤1.5 mAMP.

Hypotheses In a selected patient group suffering from faecal incontinence a one-stage permanent implant will be possible. The functional results will be improved as more time can be spent finding the optimal pacemaker settings as the risk of infection is reduced compared to the stage implant. One-Stage implantation gives the opportunity to test the amount of placebo effect with SNS.

During the first 3 months postoperative patients will be randomized to either stimulation amplitude set at 90% of sensory threshold (control group) or 3 periods of stimulation at 0.05v (placebo), 50% and 90% of sensory threshold. Patients are randomized in a 1 to 2 pattern. After the initial 3 months the stimulation amplitude is increased to sensory threshold. After six months the project ends and the number of patients achieving the 50% improvement in incontinence episodes are evaluated.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has over the last 20 years been recognised as an efficient treatment option for faecal incontinence (FI). The therapy is recommended by the International Continence Society (ICS) if conservative treatments such as; regulation of diet and fibre supplements, medication, biofeedback therapy, glycerol suppositories, mini enema or transanal irrigation have been insufficient to improve continence to a satisfactory level.

The SNS therapy has traditionally been applied as a two step procedure. Firstly, a 3-4 week test-period, often with a permanent electrode with tines, followed by permanent implantation if at least a 50% symptom reduction has been obtained during the test stimulation.

In a selected patient group(idiopathic faecal incontinence or incontinence as a result of an external anal sphincter tear (\<160 degrees)) we have evidence that 90% of patients will have a successful test period (≥50% reduction in incontinence episodes). If preoperative there is motor response on at least 3 out of 4 poles on the lead, at a threshold ≤1.5 mAMP(unpublished data, submitted for publication) .

Thus, only 10% of the patients have the lead explanted after 3 to 4 weeks. In 90% of the patients a pacemaker is implanted after the test period, these patients will have an additional operation that could have been avoided if they had the permanent pacemaker implanted at the first stage.

Hypotheses In a selected patient group suffering from faecal incontinence a one-stage permanent implant will be possible. The functional results will be improved as more time can be spent finding the optimal pacemaker settings as the risk of infection is reduced compared to the stage implant. One-Stage implantation gives the opportunity to test the amount of placebo effect with SNS.

During the first 3 months postoperative patients will be randomized to either stimulation amplitude set at 90% of sensory threshold (control group) or 3 periods of stimulation at 0.05v (placebo), 50% and 90% of sensory threshold. Patients are randomized. After the initial 3 months the stimulation amplitude is increased to sensory threshold. After six months the project ends and the number of patients achieving the 50% improvement in incontinence episodes are evaluated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Faecal Incontinence Fecal Incontinence

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients will be randomized to either control group (Stimulation amplitude at 90% of sensory threshold) or intervention arm (different stimulation amplitude - 0.05 V, 50 and 90% of sensory threshold)
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
Alle patients are stimulated sub-sensory in (3x4 weeks) and will be blinded. The investigators will not participate in the randomization, and setting of the stimulation amplitude.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control arm

Stimulation amplitude at 90% of sensory threshold during period 1 to 3. (each period 4 weeks)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sacral nerve stimulation at different stimulation amplitudes

Intervention Type DEVICE

Exploring the effect of different stimulation amplitude in a randomized study

Intervention arm

Alternation of stimulation amplitude

1. Period - Stimulation amplitude 0.05 Volts (lowest possible)
2. Period - Stimulation amplitude - 50% of sensory threshold.
3. Period - Stimulation amplitude - 90% of sensory threshold.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sacral nerve stimulation at different stimulation amplitudes

Intervention Type DEVICE

Exploring the effect of different stimulation amplitude in a randomized study

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sacral nerve stimulation at different stimulation amplitudes

Exploring the effect of different stimulation amplitude in a randomized study

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ≥18 years
* Informed consent
* Idiopathic faecal incontinence or incontinence following external sphincter tear ≤ 160 degrees.
* ≥ one faecal incontinence episode after optimized conservative treatment.
* Ability to use the patient programmer.

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Diabetes
* Neurological diseases, including spinal cord injuries
* Pelvic irradiation
* Rectal resections
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Tromso

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hvidovre University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Aarhus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jakob Jakobsen

Principal Investigator (M.D. Ph.D.)

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jakob K. Jakobsen, MD. Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Anal Physiology Laboratory, Surgical Research Section 900, Aarhus University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Anal Physiology Laboratory, Surgical Research Section 900, Aarhus University Hospital

Aarhus, Aarhus C, Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

005

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.