Does Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) Improve Outcomes in Patients Presenting With Fecal Incontinence

NCT ID: NCT01274585

Last Updated: 2018-01-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

5 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-01-31

Study Completion Date

2013-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS), a minimally invasive, simple, cost effective, and outpatient treatment of patients with urinary incontinence, can also be used to treat fecal incontinence. Specifically, the primary endpoint of this study is to determine, in a randomized controlled patient blinded study, whether PTNS decrease the episodes of fecal incontinence by 50% in the patients treated with PTNS when compared to placebo as documented by a 2 week patient bowel diary after treatment.

The investigators secondary endpoints will consist of measurements of the impact of PTNS on the severity of incontinence (defined as a decrease in the mean Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) score ), as well as on the patient quality of life factors related to fecal incontinence (defined as a decrease in the mean Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQoL) scale).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fecal Incontinence

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

No active treatment

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Posterior tibial nerve stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham needle placement without active PTNS device for 30 minutes weekly for 12 weeks

stimulation/treatment

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Stimulation using PTNS device for 30 minutes weekly for 12 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS)

Stimulation using PTNS device for 30 minutes weekly for 12 weeks

Intervention Type DEVICE

Posterior tibial nerve stimulation

Sham needle placement without active PTNS device for 30 minutes weekly for 12 weeks

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Urgent PC

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years or older
* Able to provide informed consent
* Has severe fecal incontinence (defined as weekly episodes of incontinence of mucus, liquid or solid stool)
* Available to present for weekly treatments
* Available for follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 months

Exclusion Criteria

1. Severe cardiopulmonary disease
2. Lesion of the Tibial Nerve
3. Use of a cardiac pacemaker or implantable defibrillator
4. History of inflammatory bowel disease
5. Active anal fissure, fistula, or abscess
6. Active rectal bleeding which has not been evaluated with appropriate testing, such as colonoscopy
7. Has a sphincter injury that needs sphincteroplasty
8. Wants to pursue aggressive surgical therapy with a colostomy or an artificial bowel sphincter
9. Severe distal venous insufficiency
10. Uncontrolled diabetes with peripheral nerve involvement
11. Immunosuppression
12. Pregnant or planning on becoming pregnant during treatment
13. Patients prone to bleeding
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Massachusetts General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Liliana Bordeianou

Colorectal Surgeon, PI

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Liliana Bordeianou, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Massachusetts General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MGH2010-P-000239

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.