Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence

NCT ID: NCT00977652

Last Updated: 2011-08-23

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: PHASE2
• Total Enrollment: 144 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2009-10-31
• Study Completion Date: 2011-06-30

Brief Summary

Fecal incontinence is a major public health issue since 10% of the French population aged 45 has to deal with it. Different treatments exist and have already been evaluated, like the sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) which has proved to be efficient in 75 to 100% of the anal incontinence patients without significant sphincteric lesions or rectal prolapse. However, the treatment is expensive and can have side effects. Moreover, about 20 to 30% of the patients can develop a resistance to the SNS only a few months following the definite implantation. Yet the development of the posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PNTS) offers a new perspective. It consists in stimulating the same metameric area as the sacral nerves. It is regularly used for the treatment of urinary incontinence caused by overactive bladder. It is a non-invasive technique, causing but a few side effects. A preliminary study showed that 7 in 10 incontinent patients saw an improvement when treated with PTNS.

Purpose:

The aim of this study is to analyse and evaluate the PTNS technique in the short term as a treatment of anal incontinence. It is done through the means of a multi-centric prospective randomized study.

Patients:

Will be included: all patients followed for anal incontinence (either with liquid or solid stools) having at least one accident a month for 3months, and who are not diagnosed with colorectal lesions and who are without anal or rectal significant anatomic anomalies, without rectal prolapse, and who have failed to respond to medical treatment (such as medicine or perineal reeducation). The main criterium to analyze the efficiency will be the number of fecal incontinence episodes on a bowel diary. The investigators aim to incorporate 144 patients, that is 72 in each group. 12 centers will take part in this study, that will last 2 years and 3 months. They are the centers of: Bordeaux, Clermont-Ferrand, Grenoble, Lyon, Marseille, Nancy, Nantes, Paris, Diaconesses-Croix,Paris Rothschild, Rennes, Rouen, and Toulouse.

Method:

The PTNS consists in setting two electrodes on the posterial tibial nerve pathway. The electrodes are connected to an external stimulator. After having drawn lots, patients will be treated for 3months either with effective stimulation (frequency: 14hz; impulse duration: 210usec;intensity:sensibility threshold), or with shame stimulation (intensity: 0mAmp). There will be two daily sessions of stimulation (effective, or shame), 20 min each. A pre-treatment assessment will be established, composed of a stool diary, a Cleveland Clinic score, a Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scale and an anorectal manomety, that will all be repeated by the end of the treatment.

Expected Results:

The investigators hope to prove the short term efficacy of the PTNS on anal incontinence patients.

Conditions

Fecal Incontinence

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: DOUBLE

Study Groups

Active stimulation

Percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

active stimulation

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation with following parameters: frequency: 14hz; impulse duration: 210usec;intensity:sensibility threshold during 3 months

sham stimulation

Inefficient percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation

Group Type: SHAM_COMPARATOR

sham stimulation

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Same location with the same device than active stimulation but amplitude of stimulation = 0

Interventions

active stimulation

percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation with following parameters: frequency: 14hz; impulse duration: 210usec;intensity:sensibility threshold during 3 months

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

sham stimulation

Same location with the same device than active stimulation but amplitude of stimulation = 0

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• fecal incontinence, refractory to medical treatment,for more than 3 months,with at least one episode of anal incontinence and/or urgency per month
• patient with no knowledge of cutaneous stimulation
• patients with NHS

Exclusion Criteria

• older than 18 years old
• pregnancy
• implanted stimulator
• cutaneous lesion
• cutaneous anesthesia
• patients without oral contraception
• Guardianship and curatorship
• fecal incontinence secondary to anorectal malformation, surgical sequelae, significative sphincteric lesion leading to repair at a first time, rectal prolapse, active neurological disease
• patient already treated by sacral nerve stimulation or stimulated graciloplasty, artificial bowel sphincter, radiofrequency

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Ministry of Health, France

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role: collaborator

University Hospital, Rouen

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Anne Marie LEROI

Head of the department

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Leroi

Rouen, , France

Countries

France

Other Identifiers

CPP-2008/032

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

RCB-2008-A01227-48

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2008/070/HP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id