Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-04-30
2018-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Our objectives are to:
1. address the significant gap in our knowledge regarding the peripheral and central neuroenteric axis and how perturbations in the afferent and efferent neural signaling can affect FI;
2. develop a new treatment for FI with repetitive magnetic stimulation and determine the feasibility, safety and optimal frequency setting of rTLMS and rTSMS;
3. determine the mechanistic basis for this neuromodulation therapy;
4. identify if the locus for improvement lies in the afferent or efferent signaling or both.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Translumbosacral Neuromodulation for FI
NCT03899181
Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence
NCT00974909
Sacral Nerve Stimulation Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Fecal Incontinence
NCT00200057
Comparison of Sacral Nerve Modulation and Pudendal Nerve Stimulation in Treatment of Fecal Incontinence
NCT01069016
Biofeedback for Fecal Incontinence
NCT00124904
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The impact of our project include a new non-invasive treatment modality for FI, a scientific basis for the development of this treatment and improved understanding of the peripheral and central neuroenteric axis in FI.
Aim 1: Test the hypothesis that neuromodulation therapy with combined repetitive translumbar magnetic stimulation (rTLMS) and transsacral magnetic stimulation (rTSMS) improves symptoms in FI patients. Investigators will evaluate the efficacy, safety and optimal frequency setting of rTLMS and rTSMS for FI by investigating whether 6 sessions of weekly therapy with 1 Hz or 5Hz or 15 Hz magnetic stimulations of the lumbar and sacral regions provides therapeutic response in FI patients. Investigators will randomize 48 patients with FI and assess symptoms and anorectal function. The primary outcome measure will be the reduction in number of episodes of FI. The secondary outcome measures will be i) bowel symptoms/severity (FISI, FICA), ii) quality-of-life (FI-QOL), iii) psychosocial function, iv) anal sphincter pressures, v) rectal sensation, vi) rectal compliance. A safety assessment will monitor adverse effects.
Aim 2: Test the hypothesis that repetitive translumbar magnetic stimulation (rTLMS) and transsacral magnetic stimulation (rTSMS) will improve FI symptoms and anorectal function through modulation of ascending and descending signaling pathways in the neuroenteric axis. Investigators will investigate the mechanistic basis for rTLMS/rTSMS therapy by examining the neuroenteric axis. Investigators will examine rectal and anal motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in 48 FI patients with transcranial, translumbar and transsacral magnetic stimulations (descending signaling), before and after 6 sessions of therapy with 1 Hz or 5 Hz or 15 Hz magnetic stimulations. Also, investigators will examine the cortical evoked potentials (CEP) after anal and rectal stimulation (ascending signaling). investigators will determine whether rTLMS and rTSMS therapy shortens latency and increases amplitude and area under curve (AUC) of anal and rectal MEPs and ano-cortical and recto-cortical CEPs when compared to baseline. Investigators will identify if the locus for improvement lies in the afferent signaling, efferent signaling or both and whether the neuroplastic changes are central or peripheral. The primary outcome measure for efferent signaling will be the latency of lumbo-anal and sacro-anal MEP responses and for afferent signaling will be the latency of ano-cortical CEP. Secondary outcome measures include anal and rectal electrical sensory thresholds, lumbo-rectal and sacro-rectal MEPs and recto-cortical CEPs and correlations of FI episodes and bowel symptoms with changes in latency and MEP measurements.
Participants will maintain a two week prospective fecal incontinence symptom diary. Baseline questionnaires will be administered. Patients demonstrating at least one episode of fecal incontinence per week, on average, will be eligible, pending all other eligibility criteria is met. Patients will come for brain-gut assessment (as above) as well as baseline anorectal manometry (if needed per protocol specifications). Patients will be randomized to one of the three hertz groups and have treatment one within one week of baseline assessments. A total of six weekly treatments (with a +7 day window allowed), will occur. After the six treatments, patients will have all baseline assessments repeated (brain-gut assessments, anorectal manometry and questionnaires).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1 Hz
Six sessions of weekly therapy with 1 Hz magnetic stimulations of the lumbar and sacral regions.
Repetitive lumbosacral magnetic stimulation (rTLSMS)
Patients randomized to Six sessions of weekly therapy with either 1 HZ or 5 Hz or 15 Hz magnetic stimulations of the lumbar and sacral regions.
5 Hz
Six sessions of weekly therapy with 5 Hz magnetic stimulations of the lumbar and sacral regions.
Repetitive lumbosacral magnetic stimulation (rTLSMS)
Patients randomized to Six sessions of weekly therapy with either 1 HZ or 5 Hz or 15 Hz magnetic stimulations of the lumbar and sacral regions.
15 Hz
Six sessions of weekly therapy with 15 Hz magnetic stimulations of the lumbar and sacral regions.
Repetitive lumbosacral magnetic stimulation (rTLSMS)
Patients randomized to Six sessions of weekly therapy with either 1 HZ or 5 Hz or 15 Hz magnetic stimulations of the lumbar and sacral regions.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Repetitive lumbosacral magnetic stimulation (rTLSMS)
Patients randomized to Six sessions of weekly therapy with either 1 HZ or 5 Hz or 15 Hz magnetic stimulations of the lumbar and sacral regions.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. No mucosal disease (colonoscopy + biopsy); and
3. On a 2-week stool diary patients reported at least one episode of solid or liquid FI/week.
Exclusion Criteria
2. on opioids, tricyclics (except on stable doses \> 3months);
3. active depression;
4. comorbid illnesses, severe cardiac disease, chronic renal failure or previous gastrointestinal surgery except cholecystectomy and appendectomy;
5. neurologic diseases (e.g. head injury, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, strokes, spinal cord injury);
6. impaired cognizance (mini mental score of \< 15/25) and/or legally blind;
7. metal implants, pacemakers;
8. previous pelvic surgery, bladder repair, radical hysterectomy;
9. ulcerative and Crohn's colitis;
10. rectal prolapse, anal fissure, anal surgery or inflamed hemorrhoids;
11. pregnant women
12. nursing mothers.
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Manchester
OTHER
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
NIH
Augusta University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Satish Rao, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Augusta University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Augusta University
Augusta, Georgia, United States
University of Manchester
Manchester, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.