Neuromodulation Therapy for Fecal Incontinence

NCT ID: NCT02556151

Last Updated: 2019-02-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

44 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-04-30

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Fecal Incontinence (FI) affects 8-15 % of the US population, predominantly women and elderly, and 45% of nursing home residents. It significantly impairs quality of life and poses a major health care burden. FI is characterized by significant neuromuscular dysfunction of the pelvic floor that includes bilateral lumbo-anorectal and sacro-anorectal neuropathy and sensori-motor dysfunction. This multifactorial etiology suggests that maladaptive neuroplastic changes in the neural innervation of lower gastrointestinal tract could play a significant role in the pathogenesis of FI. A critical barrier to progress in the treatment of FI is the lack of understanding of how treatments affect the core pathophysiological mechanisms of FI, and the absence of mechanistically based non-invasive therapies. Our goal is to address the problem of FI by developing therapies that modulate peripheral and central neuronal perturbations and thereby improve visceromotor control and sensori-motor dysfunctions, and to understand the neurobiologic basis of these treatments. Our central hypothesis is that a novel non-invasive treatment consisting of repetitive translumbar magnetic stimulation (rTLMS) and repetitive transsacral magnetic stimulation (rTSMS) will significantly improve FI by enhancing peripheral and central neural excitability and will provide a multidimensional therapeutic benefit- enhance anal muscle strength, improve stool perception and improve rectal capacity. Our approach is based on our preliminary studies which suggest that repetitive translumbar magnetic stimulation (rTLMS) and transsacral magnetic stimulation (rTSMS) improve anorectal pain and neuropathy and induce central neuroplastic changes.

Our objectives are to:

1. address the significant gap in our knowledge regarding the peripheral and central neuroenteric axis and how perturbations in the afferent and efferent neural signaling can affect FI;
2. develop a new treatment for FI with repetitive magnetic stimulation and determine the feasibility, safety and optimal frequency setting of rTLMS and rTSMS;
3. determine the mechanistic basis for this neuromodulation therapy;
4. identify if the locus for improvement lies in the afferent or efferent signaling or both.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Our expected outcome include development of new treatment approaches for FI which are mechanistically based, effective, safe, low cost, less invasive, low risk and less dependent on patient compliance.

The impact of our project include a new non-invasive treatment modality for FI, a scientific basis for the development of this treatment and improved understanding of the peripheral and central neuroenteric axis in FI.

Aim 1: Test the hypothesis that neuromodulation therapy with combined repetitive translumbar magnetic stimulation (rTLMS) and transsacral magnetic stimulation (rTSMS) improves symptoms in FI patients. Investigators will evaluate the efficacy, safety and optimal frequency setting of rTLMS and rTSMS for FI by investigating whether 6 sessions of weekly therapy with 1 Hz or 5Hz or 15 Hz magnetic stimulations of the lumbar and sacral regions provides therapeutic response in FI patients. Investigators will randomize 48 patients with FI and assess symptoms and anorectal function. The primary outcome measure will be the reduction in number of episodes of FI. The secondary outcome measures will be i) bowel symptoms/severity (FISI, FICA), ii) quality-of-life (FI-QOL), iii) psychosocial function, iv) anal sphincter pressures, v) rectal sensation, vi) rectal compliance. A safety assessment will monitor adverse effects.

Aim 2: Test the hypothesis that repetitive translumbar magnetic stimulation (rTLMS) and transsacral magnetic stimulation (rTSMS) will improve FI symptoms and anorectal function through modulation of ascending and descending signaling pathways in the neuroenteric axis. Investigators will investigate the mechanistic basis for rTLMS/rTSMS therapy by examining the neuroenteric axis. Investigators will examine rectal and anal motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in 48 FI patients with transcranial, translumbar and transsacral magnetic stimulations (descending signaling), before and after 6 sessions of therapy with 1 Hz or 5 Hz or 15 Hz magnetic stimulations. Also, investigators will examine the cortical evoked potentials (CEP) after anal and rectal stimulation (ascending signaling). investigators will determine whether rTLMS and rTSMS therapy shortens latency and increases amplitude and area under curve (AUC) of anal and rectal MEPs and ano-cortical and recto-cortical CEPs when compared to baseline. Investigators will identify if the locus for improvement lies in the afferent signaling, efferent signaling or both and whether the neuroplastic changes are central or peripheral. The primary outcome measure for efferent signaling will be the latency of lumbo-anal and sacro-anal MEP responses and for afferent signaling will be the latency of ano-cortical CEP. Secondary outcome measures include anal and rectal electrical sensory thresholds, lumbo-rectal and sacro-rectal MEPs and recto-cortical CEPs and correlations of FI episodes and bowel symptoms with changes in latency and MEP measurements.

Participants will maintain a two week prospective fecal incontinence symptom diary. Baseline questionnaires will be administered. Patients demonstrating at least one episode of fecal incontinence per week, on average, will be eligible, pending all other eligibility criteria is met. Patients will come for brain-gut assessment (as above) as well as baseline anorectal manometry (if needed per protocol specifications). Patients will be randomized to one of the three hertz groups and have treatment one within one week of baseline assessments. A total of six weekly treatments (with a +7 day window allowed), will occur. After the six treatments, patients will have all baseline assessments repeated (brain-gut assessments, anorectal manometry and questionnaires).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fecal Incontinence

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1 Hz

Six sessions of weekly therapy with 1 Hz magnetic stimulations of the lumbar and sacral regions.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Repetitive lumbosacral magnetic stimulation (rTLSMS)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients randomized to Six sessions of weekly therapy with either 1 HZ or 5 Hz or 15 Hz magnetic stimulations of the lumbar and sacral regions.

5 Hz

Six sessions of weekly therapy with 5 Hz magnetic stimulations of the lumbar and sacral regions.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Repetitive lumbosacral magnetic stimulation (rTLSMS)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients randomized to Six sessions of weekly therapy with either 1 HZ or 5 Hz or 15 Hz magnetic stimulations of the lumbar and sacral regions.

15 Hz

Six sessions of weekly therapy with 15 Hz magnetic stimulations of the lumbar and sacral regions.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Repetitive lumbosacral magnetic stimulation (rTLSMS)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients randomized to Six sessions of weekly therapy with either 1 HZ or 5 Hz or 15 Hz magnetic stimulations of the lumbar and sacral regions.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Repetitive lumbosacral magnetic stimulation (rTLSMS)

Patients randomized to Six sessions of weekly therapy with either 1 HZ or 5 Hz or 15 Hz magnetic stimulations of the lumbar and sacral regions.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

rTLSMS

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Recurrent episodes of FI for 6 months;
2. No mucosal disease (colonoscopy + biopsy); and
3. On a 2-week stool diary patients reported at least one episode of solid or liquid FI/week.

Exclusion Criteria

1. severe diarrhea (\>6 liquid stools/day, Bristol scale \>6);
2. on opioids, tricyclics (except on stable doses \> 3months);
3. active depression;
4. comorbid illnesses, severe cardiac disease, chronic renal failure or previous gastrointestinal surgery except cholecystectomy and appendectomy;
5. neurologic diseases (e.g. head injury, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, strokes, spinal cord injury);
6. impaired cognizance (mini mental score of \< 15/25) and/or legally blind;
7. metal implants, pacemakers;
8. previous pelvic surgery, bladder repair, radical hysterectomy;
9. ulcerative and Crohn's colitis;
10. rectal prolapse, anal fissure, anal surgery or inflamed hemorrhoids;
11. pregnant women
12. nursing mothers.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Manchester

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Augusta University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Satish Rao, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Augusta University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Augusta University

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

University of Manchester

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R21DK104127-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

1R21DK104127-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.