Long-term Efficacy of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation Applied to Patients With Faecal Incontinence.
NCT ID: NCT05016453
Last Updated: 2021-08-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
139 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2010-01-08
2021-04-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators therefore aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of PTNS, considered 3 years of follow-up. The investigators also aimed to identify predictors of responses and suggest a new approach for partial responders.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Faecal Incontinence
NCT00530933
Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence
NCT00974909
Does Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) Improve Outcomes in Patients Presenting With Fecal Incontinence
NCT01274585
Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Patients With Fecal Incontinence
NCT01162525
Prospective, Multicenter Trial to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence
NCT01666405
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
PTNS sessions were performed in three phases: weekly for three months in the first phase, biweekly for three months in the second phase, and monthly for six months in the third and final phase.
Clinical control at the end of each phase and an additional follow-up was performed at 36 months. Wexner score, faecal urgency, bowel habits and quality of life for FI were assessed.
Patients were categorized in three groups: optimal responders when there was an improvement in Wexner score \> 50%; partial responders if the improvement in Wexner score was 25-50%; and non-responders, when the improvement of Wexner score was \< 25%.
Optimal responders and partial responders progressed into successive phases, whereas non-responders abandoned PTNS and other treatment options were offered.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* External anal sphincter lesion of \> 180º.
* Unavailability to attend regularly outpatient clinic.
* Major psychologic or psychiatric comorbidities
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Luis Sánchez Guillen
Clinical Professor Luis Sánchez-Guillén
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital General Universitario de Elche
Elche, Alicante, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Macmillan AK, Merrie AE, Marshall RJ, Parry BR. The prevalence of fecal incontinence in community-dwelling adults: a systematic review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Aug;47(8):1341-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0593-0.
Maestre Y, Pares D, Vial M, Bohle B, Sala M, Grande L. [Prevalence of fecal incontinence and its relationship with bowel habit in patients attended in primary care]. Med Clin (Barc). 2010 Jun 12;135(2):59-62. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2010.01.031. Epub 2010 Apr 22. Spanish.
MacLennan AH, Taylor AW, Wilson DH, Wilson D. The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery. BJOG. 2000 Dec;107(12):1460-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11669.x.
Johanson JF, Lafferty J. Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Jan;91(1):33-6.
Madoff RD. Surgical treatment options for fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology. 2004 Jan;126(1 Suppl 1):S48-54. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.015.
Jarrett ME, Mowatt G, Glazener CM, Fraser C, Nicholls RJ, Grant AM, Kamm MA. Systematic review of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and constipation. Br J Surg. 2004 Dec;91(12):1559-69. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4796.
Thin NN, Horrocks EJ, Hotouras A, Palit S, Thaha MA, Chan CL, Matzel KE, Knowles CH. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of neuromodulation in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 2013 Oct;100(11):1430-47. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9226.
Gupta P, Ehlert MJ, Sirls LT, Peters KM. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation and sacral neuromodulation: an update. Curr Urol Rep. 2015 Feb;16(2):4. doi: 10.1007/s11934-014-0479-1.
Hidalgo-Pujol M, Andriola V, Jimenez-Gomez LM, Ostiz F, Espin E. Medium-term outcome of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Nov;22(11):875-879. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1892-0. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
Hotouras A, Ribas Y, Allison M, Murphy J. The CONFIDeNT trial. Lancet. 2016 Feb 13;387(10019):643-644. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00281-6. No abstract available.
de la Portilla F, Laporte M, Maestre MV, Diaz-Pavon JM, Gollonet JL, Palacios C, Vazquez-Monchul JM, Garcia-Cabrera AM, Jimenez-Rodriguez RM, Sanchez Gil JM. Percutaneous neuromodulation of the posterior tibial nerve for the treatment of faecal incontinence - mid-term results: is retreatment required? Colorectal Dis. 2014 Apr;16(4):304-10. doi: 10.1111/codi.12539.
Hotouras A, Murphy J, Walsh U, Allison M, Curry A, Williams NS, Knowles C, Chan CL. Outcome of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) for fecal incontinence: a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg. 2014 May;259(5):939-43. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a6266c.
Munoz-Duyos A, Lagares-Tena L, Vargas-Pierolas H, Rodon A, Navarro-Luna A. High-resolution circuit for the diagnosis of faecal incontinence. Patient satisfaction. Cir Esp. 2017 May;95(5):276-282. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2017.04.012. Epub 2017 Jun 8. English, Spanish.
Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, Wexner SD, Bliss D, Lowry AC. Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Jan;43(1):9-16; discussion 16-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02237236.
Hotouras A, Thaha MA, Allison ME, Currie A, Scott SM, Chan CL. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in females with faecal incontinence: the impact of sphincter morphology and rectal sensation on the clinical outcome. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jul;27(7):927-30. doi: 10.1007/s00384-011-1405-3. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
Lemon SC, Roy J, Clark MA, Friedmann PD, Rakowski W. Classification and regression tree analysis in public health: methodological review and comparison with logistic regression. Ann Behav Med. 2003 Dec;26(3):172-81. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2603_02.
Shafik A, Ahmed I, El-Sibai O, Mostafa RM. Percutaneous peripheral neuromodulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Eur Surg Res. 2003 Mar-Apr;35(2):103-7. doi: 10.1159/000069399.
Queralto M, Portier G, Cabarrot PH, Bonnaud G, Chotard JP, Nadrigny M, Lazorthes F. Preliminary results of peripheral transcutaneous neuromodulation in the treatment of idiopathic fecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006 Oct;21(7):670-2. doi: 10.1007/s00384-005-0068-3. Epub 2005 Dec 6.
Govaert B, Pares D, Delgado-Aros S, La Torre F, Van Gemert WG, Baeten CG. A prospective multicentre study to investigate percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis. 2010 Dec;12(12):1236-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02020.x.
Thomas GP, Dudding TC, Bradshaw E, Nicholls RJ, Vaizey CJ. A pilot study to compare daily with twice weekly transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis. 2013 Dec;15(12):1504-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12428.
Arroyo Fernandez R, Avendano Coy J, Ando Lafuente S, Martin Correa M feminineT, Ferri Morales A. Posterior tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence: a systematic review. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2018 Sep;110(9):577-588. doi: 10.17235/reed.2018.5007/2017.
Pena Ros E, Parra Banos PA, Benavides Buleje JA, Munoz Camarena JM, Escamilla Segade C, Candel Arenas MF, Gonzalez Valverde FM, Albarracin Marin-Blazquez A. Short-term outcome of percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) for the treatment of faecal incontinence. Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Jan;20(1):19-24. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1380-8.
Lopez-Delgado A, Arroyo A, Ruiz-Tovar J, Alcaide MJ, Diez M, Moya P, Santos J, Calpena R. Effect on anal pressure of percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis. 2014 Jul;16(7):533-7. doi: 10.1111/codi.12628.
Leroi AM, Siproudhis L, Etienney I, Damon H, Zerbib F, Amarenco G, Vitton V, Faucheron JL, Thomas C, Mion F, Roumeguere P, Gourcerol G, Bouvier M, Lallouche K, Menard JF, Queralto M. Transcutaneous electrical tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence: a randomized trial (CONSORT 1a). Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec;107(12):1888-96. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.330. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PTNSLONGTERMEFFICACY
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.