Standardization of Lead Placement for Sacral Neuromodulation. Part 1

NCT ID: NCT03194425

Last Updated: 2019-10-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-09-01

Study Completion Date

2022-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Retrospective case-control study.

A substantial number of patients do not respond favourably to sacral neurostimulation (SNS) although clinically, they appear to have the same lower urinary tract dysfunction characteristics as the ones with good responses. This may be due to methodological issues (lead position) or patient selection. The purpose of this study is to improve and standardize lead position, in order to increase the patient response to test stimulation and to SNS treatment, and to decrease adverse events.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Overactive Bladder Non Obstructive Urinary Retention

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

OAB

Patients with overactive bladder on sacral neuromodulation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pelvic floor EMG

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Define pelvic floor EMG template measured by probe

NOUR

Patients with non-obstructive urinary retention on sacral neuromodulation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pelvic floor EMG

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Define pelvic floor EMG template measured by probe

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pelvic floor EMG

Define pelvic floor EMG template measured by probe

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Male or female aged ≥18 years and competent to provide consent
2. Minimum 3 months of self-reported OAB symptoms or self-reported obstructive LUTS in addition to confirmed non-obstructive urinary retention on UDO
3. Failed, or are not a candidate for more conservative treatment (i.e., pelvic floor training, biofeedback, behavioral modification, oral pharmacotherapy)
4. Willing to discontinue OAB medications for 2 weeks prior to the implant and for the entire study period
5. Able to thoroughly fill in all questionnaires, voiding diaries and office visits for device programming and clinical evaluations before the TLP, 3 weeks after TLP and 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year after implantation of definitive IPG.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Current of prior evidence of primary stress incontinence or mixed incontinence where the stress component overrides the urgency component
2. Any neurological condition that may interfere with normal bladder function, including stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, clinically significant peripheral neuropathy, or spinal cord injury (e.g., paraplegia)
3. Urinary tract mechanical obstruction including but not limited to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
4. Treatment of bladder or pelvic floor dysfunction with botulinum toxin (Botox ®) or surgery in past 12 months
5. Unable to toilet self and have and maintain good personal hygiene
6. Unable to provide clear, thoughtful responses to questions and questionnaires
7. Urinary tract, bladder or vaginal infection or inflammation
8. Hematuria, and absence of an elaborate diagnostic work-up
9. Severe or uncontrolled diabetes (A1C \> 8, documented in the last 3 months) or diabetes with peripheral nerve involvement
10. Allergy to local anesthetic or adhesives
11. Bleeding disorder or on an anticoagulant that cannot be stopped for 3 days before the implant
12. Pregnant, lactating, planning to become pregnant, given birth in the past 12 months, or female of child-bearing potential and not practicing a medically-approved method of birth control
13. Skin lesions or compromised skin at the implant or stimulation site
14. Use of investigational drug or device therapy or participation in any study involving or impacting gynecologic, urinary or renal function within past 4 weeks
15. Passive implants (e.g., prostheses) are allowed, but no implanted metal should be at the Neurostimulator implant site
16. Knowledge of planned MRIs, diathermy, or high output ultrasonic exposure
17. Presence of a documented condition or abnormality that could compromise the safety of the patient
18. Any psychiatric or personality disorder at the discretion of the study physician
19. Interstitial cystitis or bladder pain syndrome as defined by the EAU guidelines
20. Life expectancy of less than 1 year
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Leiden University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universiteit Antwerpen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Donald Vaganée

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stefan De Wachter, MD PhD FEBU

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University Hospital, Antwerp

Donald Vaganée

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Antwerp

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Antwerp University Hospital

Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

B300201523497 Part 1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Outcomes of Pudendal InterStim
NCT00719589 COMPLETED