Standardization of Lead Placement for Sacral Neuromodulation. Part 1
NCT ID: NCT03194425
Last Updated: 2019-10-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-09-01
2022-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A substantial number of patients do not respond favourably to sacral neurostimulation (SNS) although clinically, they appear to have the same lower urinary tract dysfunction characteristics as the ones with good responses. This may be due to methodological issues (lead position) or patient selection. The purpose of this study is to improve and standardize lead position, in order to increase the patient response to test stimulation and to SNS treatment, and to decrease adverse events.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Standardization of Lead Placement for Sacral Neuromodulation Part 2
NCT03199443
Ambulatory Urodynamic Evaluation of Sacral Neuromodulation for Non-Obstructive Urinary Retention
NCT00970242
Sacral Neuromodulation and Pudendal Somatic Afferents
NCT03614754
Sacral Neuromodulation Test With Bilateral First Stage Tined Lead Procedure in Patients With Non-obstructive Urinary Retention: A Pilot Study
NCT00878176
Screening Method in Sacral Neuromodulation
NCT01130415
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
OAB
Patients with overactive bladder on sacral neuromodulation.
Pelvic floor EMG
Define pelvic floor EMG template measured by probe
NOUR
Patients with non-obstructive urinary retention on sacral neuromodulation.
Pelvic floor EMG
Define pelvic floor EMG template measured by probe
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pelvic floor EMG
Define pelvic floor EMG template measured by probe
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Minimum 3 months of self-reported OAB symptoms or self-reported obstructive LUTS in addition to confirmed non-obstructive urinary retention on UDO
3. Failed, or are not a candidate for more conservative treatment (i.e., pelvic floor training, biofeedback, behavioral modification, oral pharmacotherapy)
4. Willing to discontinue OAB medications for 2 weeks prior to the implant and for the entire study period
5. Able to thoroughly fill in all questionnaires, voiding diaries and office visits for device programming and clinical evaluations before the TLP, 3 weeks after TLP and 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year after implantation of definitive IPG.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Any neurological condition that may interfere with normal bladder function, including stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, clinically significant peripheral neuropathy, or spinal cord injury (e.g., paraplegia)
3. Urinary tract mechanical obstruction including but not limited to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
4. Treatment of bladder or pelvic floor dysfunction with botulinum toxin (Botox ®) or surgery in past 12 months
5. Unable to toilet self and have and maintain good personal hygiene
6. Unable to provide clear, thoughtful responses to questions and questionnaires
7. Urinary tract, bladder or vaginal infection or inflammation
8. Hematuria, and absence of an elaborate diagnostic work-up
9. Severe or uncontrolled diabetes (A1C \> 8, documented in the last 3 months) or diabetes with peripheral nerve involvement
10. Allergy to local anesthetic or adhesives
11. Bleeding disorder or on an anticoagulant that cannot be stopped for 3 days before the implant
12. Pregnant, lactating, planning to become pregnant, given birth in the past 12 months, or female of child-bearing potential and not practicing a medically-approved method of birth control
13. Skin lesions or compromised skin at the implant or stimulation site
14. Use of investigational drug or device therapy or participation in any study involving or impacting gynecologic, urinary or renal function within past 4 weeks
15. Passive implants (e.g., prostheses) are allowed, but no implanted metal should be at the Neurostimulator implant site
16. Knowledge of planned MRIs, diathermy, or high output ultrasonic exposure
17. Presence of a documented condition or abnormality that could compromise the safety of the patient
18. Any psychiatric or personality disorder at the discretion of the study physician
19. Interstitial cystitis or bladder pain syndrome as defined by the EAU guidelines
20. Life expectancy of less than 1 year
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Leiden University Medical Center
OTHER
Universiteit Antwerpen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Donald Vaganée
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stefan De Wachter, MD PhD FEBU
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University Hospital, Antwerp
Donald Vaganée
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Antwerp
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Antwerp University Hospital
Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
B300201523497 Part 1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.