Efficacy of Sacral Nerve Modulation on Urinary and Defecation Dysfunction After Spinal Cord Injury:A Prospective, Single-arm Study

NCT ID: NCT06553469

Last Updated: 2024-08-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

41 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-12-01

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to investigate the long-term efficacy of sacral nerve modulation surgery in the treatment of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction caused by incomplete spinal cord injury, as well as its preventive effect on complications of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. We will use urodynamic examination results such as maximum bladder capacity and detrusor leak point pressure, combined with renal function and urinary ultrasound results, as our evaluation indicators. Follow up evaluations will be conducted at 6 and 12 months after permanent implantation, and periodic comparisons will be made with baseline data to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness and safety of sacral nerve regulation surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Spinal cord injury is a serious type of central nervous system injury that not only causes movement disorders, but also damages the bladder, intestines, and autonomic nervous circuits related to sexual function, leading to urinary and defecation disorders. Sacral nerve modulation is a technology that applies low-frequency electric pulse to specific sacral nerve continuously to affect and regulate the function of target organs, so as to treat urgent urinary incontinence, overactivity of bladder, urinary retention, fecal incontinence and other diseases. However, there is currently no consensus on whether this technology can treat urinary and defecation dysfunction caused by spinal cord injury, and its specific mechanism still needs to be studied. Existing research shows that this technique can reduce the excitability of sphincter by inhibiting the protective reflex to treat urinary retention; Treating detrusor overactivity by inhibiting detrusor muscle activity without affecting urethral resistance and detrusor muscle contraction during urination. This study hypothesizes that sacral nerve modulation intervention after spinal cord injury can reduce bladder spasms, maintain bladder compliance, bladder capacity, and low bladder filling pressure, delay the progression of bladder fibrosis and hydronephrosis after spinal cord injury, and improve symptoms such as constipation. Based on the above evidence and hypotheses, we designed a single arm clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of sacral nerve modulation surgery in treating urinary and defecation dysfunction after incomplete spinal cord injury, especially in preventing complications such as bladder fibrosis and hydronephrosis. We also evaluated the impact of sacral nerve modulation surgery on the quality of life of patients after spinal cord injury, as well as the improvement effect of sacral nerve modulation surgery on urinary and reproductive system related symptoms and intestinal symptoms.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cystometry Sacral Neuromodulation Ultrasound

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SNM group

After screening according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the subjects were enrolled in the study. The sacral nerve regulation treatment was divided into two phases. Phase I was the testing phase, during which sacral nerve stimulation electrode component implantation was performed. After electrode implantation, testing was conducted for 2-4 weeks. According to the urine diary and scale scores, if the symptoms improved by ≥ 50%, or if the patient requested to continue with phase II and was evaluated by the researcher as suitable for implantation, phase II (permanent implantation phase) treatment was performed, and sacral nerve stimulation pulse generator component implantation was performed.During the trial period, all patients in the intervention group received routine care for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction, including regular clean interval catheterization (CIC), in addition to sacral nerve regulation therapy

sacral neuromodulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

After screening according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the subjects were enrolled in the study. The sacral nerve regulation treatment was divided into two phases. Phase I was the testing phase, during which the sacral nerve stimulation electrode component was implanted. After the electrode was implanted, it was tested for 2-4 weeks. According to the urine diary and scale scores, if the symptoms improved by ≥ 50%, or if the patient requested to continue with Phase II and was evaluated by the researcher as suitable for implantation, Phase II (permanent implantation phase) treatment was performed, during which the sacral nerve stimulation pulse generator component was implanted

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

sacral neuromodulation

After screening according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the subjects were enrolled in the study. The sacral nerve regulation treatment was divided into two phases. Phase I was the testing phase, during which the sacral nerve stimulation electrode component was implanted. After the electrode was implanted, it was tested for 2-4 weeks. According to the urine diary and scale scores, if the symptoms improved by ≥ 50%, or if the patient requested to continue with Phase II and was evaluated by the researcher as suitable for implantation, Phase II (permanent implantation phase) treatment was performed, during which the sacral nerve stimulation pulse generator component was implanted

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age over 18 years old, gender not limited
* Diagnosed with urinary and defecation dysfunction caused by spinal cord injury
* Urodynamic examination suggests bladder dysfunction
* ASIA spinal cord injury classification: B, C, or D
* Safe bladder capacity\>100ml
* Patients who can undergo sacral nerve regulation surgery after evaluation
* If you plan not to combine medication during the study period, you need to stop taking the medication for at least 7 days before the screening period. If you plan to continue drug treatment during the study period, you need to maintain the same dosage or stop taking the medication after evaluation by a doctor.
* Voluntarily participate in this clinical study, and the subjects sign a written informed consent form before the start of the study.
* After testing treatment, if any of the following conditions are met, permanent implantation of a sacral nerve stimulator is feasible① The average daily frequency of urination during the last 3 days of experiential therapy decreased by ≥ 50% compared to baseline;② The average urinary urgency score for the last 3 days of experiential therapy decreased by ≥ 50% compared to baseline; ③ The number of urinary incontinence episodes in the last 3 days of experiential therapy decreased by ≥ 50% compared to baseline;④ The average urine output per session during the last 3 days of experiential therapy increased by ≥ 50% compared to baseline;⑤ The patient requires permanent implantation due to improvement in intestinal and sexual function, and after evaluation by the researcher, can undergo phase II treatment

Exclusion Criteria

* Other causes of lower urinary tract dysfunction cannot be ruled out, or other diseases that may lead to lower urinary tract dysfunction cannot be ruled out
* Pregnant women, lactating women, women of childbearing age who plan to conceive or have no safe contraceptive measures during the study period
* Patients with mental and cognitive impairments, as well as those who are unable to cooperate with the experimental process
* Patients with untreated infections, coagulation disorders, malignant tumors, and other serious illnesses
* Individuals who have undergone other relevant surgical treatments within 3 months prior to enrollment (including but not limited to bladder wall injection of botulinum toxin type A), or have participated in other clinical trials
* Other situations that researchers consider inappropriate to participate in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lipeng Chen, Dortor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Jinan, Shandong, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yan Li, Dortor

Role: CONTACT

18560089113

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jazayeri SB, Maroufi SF, Mohammadi E, Dabbagh Ohadi MA, Hagen EM, Chalangari M, Jazayeri SB, Safdarian M, Zadegan SA, Ghodsi Z, Rahimi-Movaghar V. Incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury worldwide: A systematic review, data integration, and update. World Neurosurg X. 2023 Feb 1;18:100171. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100171. eCollection 2023 Apr.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36910686 (View on PubMed)

Quadri SA, Farooqui M, Ikram A, Zafar A, Khan MA, Suriya SS, Claus CF, Fiani B, Rahman M, Ramachandran A, Armstrong IIT, Taqi MA, Mortazavi MM. Recent update on basic mechanisms of spinal cord injury. Neurosurg Rev. 2020 Apr;43(2):425-441. doi: 10.1007/s10143-018-1008-3. Epub 2018 Jul 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29998371 (View on PubMed)

Redshaw JD, Lenherr SM, Elliott SP, Stoffel JT, Rosenbluth JP, Presson AP, Myers JB; Neurogenic Bladder Research Group (NBRG.org). Protocol for a randomized clinical trial investigating early sacral nerve stimulation as an adjunct to standard neurogenic bladder management following acute spinal cord injury. BMC Urol. 2018 Aug 29;18(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0383-y.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30157824 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

YL01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.