Efficacy of New Protocols in the Treatment of Upper Limb Dysfunctions in Patients With Cerebral Palsy
NCT ID: NCT03048851
Last Updated: 2020-05-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
125 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-08-31
2019-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of New Protocols in the Treatment of Upper Limb Dysfunctions in Patients With Cerebral Palsy
NCT02039284
Comparative Effectiveness of a Kinect-based Unilateral Arm Training System vs Constraint-Induced Therapy for Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT02808195
Effectiveness of Unilateral Versus Bilateral Intensive Training in Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT02808156
Effects of Forms of Modified CIT on Upper Extremity Performance in Cerebral Palsy
NCT01643239
Motion Analysis of Sit-to-Stand Movements in Children With Spastic Diplegia
NCT00314301
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Low dosage SES group
Low dosage SES group received the low dosage SES training in addition to traditional rehabilitation. Each SES session involved electrical stimulation followed by UE training in addition to home program.
Low dosage SES group
The participants were randomly assigned to one of the five intervention groups. Low dosage SES group received the SES (Micro-Z Mini, Prizm Medical Inc., USA) training in addition to traditional rehabilitation. Each SES session involved electrical stimulation followed by UE training in addition to home program.The novel SES programs were conducted twice per week, for 12 weeks. Each SES session involved electrical stimulation followed by UE training in addition to home program. The SES was applied to the forearm and whole hand with mesh glove (Electro-Mesh Glove-Sleeve Electrode Kit) for 45 minutes and arm with wrap for 45 minutes. The pulse width was set to 300us for all stimulation levels. The frequency was set to 100 Hz and 10 Hz.
High dosage SES group
High dosage SES group received the high dosage SES training in addition to traditional rehabilitation. Each SES session involved electrical stimulation followed by UE training in addition to home program.
High dosage SES group
The participants were randomly assigned to one of the five intervention groups. High dosage SES group received the SES (Micro-Z Mini, Prizm Medical Inc., USA) training in addition to traditional rehabilitation. Each SES session involved electrical stimulation followed by UE training in addition to home program.The novel SES programs were conducted twice per week, for 12 weeks. Each SES session involved electrical stimulation followed by UE training in addition to home program. The SES was applied to the forearm and whole hand with mesh glove (Electro-Mesh Glove-Sleeve Electrode Kit) for 90 minutes and arm with wrap for 90 minutes. The pulse width was set to 300us for all stimulation levels. The frequency was set to 100 Hz and 10 Hz.
VRCIT group
VRCIT group received the VRCIT training in addition to traditional rehabilitation.Each VRCIT session involved practice of functional tasks with the more affected UE followed by virtual-reality based eye-hand coordination tasks with the more affected UE for, in addition to home program, and restraint of the less affected UE for 1.5 hours per day.
VRCIT group
The participants were randomly assigned to one of the five intervention groups. VRCIT group received the VRCIT training plus traditional rehabilitation, conducted twice per week for 12 weeks. Each VRCIT session involved practice of functional tasks with the more affected UE followed by virtual-reality based eye-hand coordination tasks with the more affected UE for, plus home program, and restraint of the less affected UE for 1.5 hours per day. The functional training of the more affected UE focused on massive practice of functional activities using the more affected arm, with the principles of shaping and repetitive task practice applied during training. The VRCIT combined CIT and commercially available VR-based systems including Sony Playstation EyeToy and Nintendo Wii.
VRCIT+SES group
VRCIT+SES group received the VRCIT and SES training in addition to traditional rehabilitation.
VRCIT+SES group
The participants were randomly assigned to one of the five intervention groups. VRCIT+SES group executed VR programs by affected UE in Mesh-gloves (Electro-Mesh Glove-Sleeve Electrode Kit) with the optimal SES (Micro-Z Mini, Prizm Medical Inc., USA) protocol formulated from the 1st phase study. The VRCIT program was conducted 1.5 hours/time, twice/week for 12 weeks. The VRCIT combined CIT and commercially available VR-based systems. Some commercially programs, such as Sony Playstation EyeToy (Sony Computer Entertainment America, Foster City, Calif., USA), and Nintendo Wii (Nintendo Domestic Distributor, College Point, N.Y., USA).
traditional rehabilitation group
Shame control group received the shame SES and traditional rehabilitation programs.
traditional rehabilitation program
The participants were randomly assigned to one of the five intervention groups. The absence of muscle contractions was controlled by the investigator the sham stimulation was carried out identically, but the stimulation amplitude was set to 0 milliampere(mA). Subjects were not informed about the stimulation level and were instructed to distract attention from the stimulation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Low dosage SES group
The participants were randomly assigned to one of the five intervention groups. Low dosage SES group received the SES (Micro-Z Mini, Prizm Medical Inc., USA) training in addition to traditional rehabilitation. Each SES session involved electrical stimulation followed by UE training in addition to home program.The novel SES programs were conducted twice per week, for 12 weeks. Each SES session involved electrical stimulation followed by UE training in addition to home program. The SES was applied to the forearm and whole hand with mesh glove (Electro-Mesh Glove-Sleeve Electrode Kit) for 45 minutes and arm with wrap for 45 minutes. The pulse width was set to 300us for all stimulation levels. The frequency was set to 100 Hz and 10 Hz.
High dosage SES group
The participants were randomly assigned to one of the five intervention groups. High dosage SES group received the SES (Micro-Z Mini, Prizm Medical Inc., USA) training in addition to traditional rehabilitation. Each SES session involved electrical stimulation followed by UE training in addition to home program.The novel SES programs were conducted twice per week, for 12 weeks. Each SES session involved electrical stimulation followed by UE training in addition to home program. The SES was applied to the forearm and whole hand with mesh glove (Electro-Mesh Glove-Sleeve Electrode Kit) for 90 minutes and arm with wrap for 90 minutes. The pulse width was set to 300us for all stimulation levels. The frequency was set to 100 Hz and 10 Hz.
VRCIT group
The participants were randomly assigned to one of the five intervention groups. VRCIT group received the VRCIT training plus traditional rehabilitation, conducted twice per week for 12 weeks. Each VRCIT session involved practice of functional tasks with the more affected UE followed by virtual-reality based eye-hand coordination tasks with the more affected UE for, plus home program, and restraint of the less affected UE for 1.5 hours per day. The functional training of the more affected UE focused on massive practice of functional activities using the more affected arm, with the principles of shaping and repetitive task practice applied during training. The VRCIT combined CIT and commercially available VR-based systems including Sony Playstation EyeToy and Nintendo Wii.
VRCIT+SES group
The participants were randomly assigned to one of the five intervention groups. VRCIT+SES group executed VR programs by affected UE in Mesh-gloves (Electro-Mesh Glove-Sleeve Electrode Kit) with the optimal SES (Micro-Z Mini, Prizm Medical Inc., USA) protocol formulated from the 1st phase study. The VRCIT program was conducted 1.5 hours/time, twice/week for 12 weeks. The VRCIT combined CIT and commercially available VR-based systems. Some commercially programs, such as Sony Playstation EyeToy (Sony Computer Entertainment America, Foster City, Calif., USA), and Nintendo Wii (Nintendo Domestic Distributor, College Point, N.Y., USA).
traditional rehabilitation program
The participants were randomly assigned to one of the five intervention groups. The absence of muscle contractions was controlled by the investigator the sham stimulation was carried out identically, but the stimulation amplitude was set to 0 milliampere(mA). Subjects were not informed about the stimulation level and were instructed to distract attention from the stimulation.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aged 2-24 years
* Ability to undergo clinical assessment
* Ability to comprehend commands and cooperate during an examination
Exclusion Criteria
* Progressive neurological disorder or severe concurrent illness or disease not typically associated with CP
* Active medical conditions such as pneumonia or poor physical conditions that would interfere with participation
* Any major surgery or nerve block in the preceding 3 months
* Metabolic or hormonal disturbance
* Cardiovascular disorder
* Poor tolerance or a poor cooperation during assessment
2 Years
24 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Chia-Ling Chen, MD,PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Taoyuan District, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
103-7425A3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.