Efficacy of New Protocols in the Treatment of Upper Limb Dysfunctions in Patients With Cerebral Palsy
NCT ID: NCT02039284
Last Updated: 2018-06-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
61 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-05-31
2018-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of New Protocols in the Treatment of Upper Limb Dysfunctions in Patients With Cerebral Palsy
NCT03048851
Augmented Effects of Virtual-reality Cycling Training on Upper Limb Motor Functions by NIBS in Patients With CP
NCT04101994
Effects of Forms of Modified CIT on Upper Extremity Performance in Cerebral Palsy
NCT01643239
Comparative Effectiveness of a Kinect-based Unilateral Arm Training System vs Constraint-Induced Therapy for Children With Cerebral Palsy
NCT02808195
Development of Kinect-assisted Home-based Bilateral Arm Training Program for Cerebral Palsy
NCT02801279
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This 4-year project will recruit an estimated 92-100 patients with CP. A blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) study was designed. In the phase I (1st year), investigators will set-up the experimental protocols and perform pilot study. Twenty patients will be randomized into 4 groups: SES, VCT, VRCIT, and shame control groups. In the phase II (2nd -3rd year), 36-40 patients will be randomized into 2 groups: SES and shame control groups. In the phase III (3rd -4th year), 36-40 patients will be randomized into 2 groups:VCT and VRCIT groups. The outcome measures include biomechanical, physiological (muscle tone, muscle strength and endurance, kinematics, bone density, body compositions, metabolism), and clinical assessments, including functioning (motor impairment, movement and participation) and HRQOL, based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. The outcome measures will be administered at before, immediately after 12-week intervention, and 3-month follow-up assessments.
This project is significant for the translational and evidence-based medicine on CP neurorehabilitation. The research will offer valuable biomechanical and physiological biomarker that support motor control models proposed to account for motor problems and new protocol intervention in these patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SES group
SES group received the SES training in addition to traditional rehabilitation. Each SES session involved electrical stimulation followed by UE training in addition to home program.
SES
SES group received the SES training in addition to traditional rehabilitation. Each SES session involved electrical stimulation followed by UE training in addition to home program.The novel SES programs were conducted three times per week, for 12 weeks. Each SES session involved electrical stimulation followed by UE training in addition to home program. The SES was applied to the forearm and whole hand with mesh glove for 20-30 minutes and arm with wrap for 20-30 minutes. The pulse width was set to 300 us for all stimulation levels. The frequency was set to 40-50 Hz.
VCT group
VCT group received the VCT training in addition to traditional rehabilitation.Each UE VCT session involved upper limb cycling training followed by UE training in addition to home program. The cycling program consisted of a warm-up exercise, twenty repetitions of hand push-up movements in the sitting position, UE cycling, and a cool-down exercise.
VCT
The UE VCT programs were conducted three times per week, for 12 weeks. Each UE VCT session involved upper limb cycling training followed by UE training in addition to home program. The cycling program consisted of a warm-up exercise, twenty repetitions of hand push-up movements in the sitting position, UE cycling, and a cool-down exercise. The warm-up and cool-down exercises involved stretching and relaxing the head, neck, and the upper and lower body.
VRCIT group
VRCIT group received the VRCIT training in addition to traditional rehabilitation.Each VRCIT session involved practice of functional tasks with the more affected UE followed by virtual-reality based eye-hand coordination tasks with the more affected UE for, in addition to home program, and restraint of the less affected UE for 3.5 to 4 hours per day.
VRCIT
VRCIT group received the VRCIT training in addition to traditional rehabilitation, conducted three times per week, for 12 weeks. Each VRCIT session involved practice of functional tasks with the more affected UE followed by virtual-reality based eye-hand coordination tasks with the more affected UE for, in addition to home program, and restraint of the less affected UE for 3.5 to 4 hours per day. The functional training of the more affected UE focused on massive practice of functional activities using the more affected arm, with the principles of shaping and repetitive task practice applied during training.
traditional rehabilitation group
Shame control group received the shame SES and traditional rehabilitation programs.
traditional rehabilitation program
The absence of muscle contractions was controlled by the investigator the sham stimulation was carried out identically, but the stimulation amplitude was set to 0 milliampere(mA). Subjects were not informed about the stimulation level and were instructed to distract attention from the stimulation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SES
SES group received the SES training in addition to traditional rehabilitation. Each SES session involved electrical stimulation followed by UE training in addition to home program.The novel SES programs were conducted three times per week, for 12 weeks. Each SES session involved electrical stimulation followed by UE training in addition to home program. The SES was applied to the forearm and whole hand with mesh glove for 20-30 minutes and arm with wrap for 20-30 minutes. The pulse width was set to 300 us for all stimulation levels. The frequency was set to 40-50 Hz.
VCT
The UE VCT programs were conducted three times per week, for 12 weeks. Each UE VCT session involved upper limb cycling training followed by UE training in addition to home program. The cycling program consisted of a warm-up exercise, twenty repetitions of hand push-up movements in the sitting position, UE cycling, and a cool-down exercise. The warm-up and cool-down exercises involved stretching and relaxing the head, neck, and the upper and lower body.
VRCIT
VRCIT group received the VRCIT training in addition to traditional rehabilitation, conducted three times per week, for 12 weeks. Each VRCIT session involved practice of functional tasks with the more affected UE followed by virtual-reality based eye-hand coordination tasks with the more affected UE for, in addition to home program, and restraint of the less affected UE for 3.5 to 4 hours per day. The functional training of the more affected UE focused on massive practice of functional activities using the more affected arm, with the principles of shaping and repetitive task practice applied during training.
traditional rehabilitation program
The absence of muscle contractions was controlled by the investigator the sham stimulation was carried out identically, but the stimulation amplitude was set to 0 milliampere(mA). Subjects were not informed about the stimulation level and were instructed to distract attention from the stimulation.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. aged 3-20 years
3. ability to undergo clinical assessment
4. ability to comprehend commands and cooperate during an examination
Exclusion Criteria
2. progressive neurological disorder or severe concurrent illness or disease not typically associated with CP
3. active medical conditions such as pneumonia or poor physical conditions that would interfere with participation
4. any major surgery or nerve block in the preceding 3 months
5. metabolic or hormonal disturbance
6. cardiovascular disorder
7. poor tolerance or a poor cooperation during assessment
3 Years
20 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan
OTHER_GOV
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Chia-Ling Chen, MD,PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Taoyuan District, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
101-5261A3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.