Efficacy of New Protocols in the Treatment of Upper Limb Dysfunctions in Patients With Cerebral Palsy

NCT ID: NCT02039284

Last Updated: 2018-06-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

61 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-05-31

Study Completion Date

2018-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common childhood motor disability. Weakness, spasticity, and loss of dexterity are the major problems in patients with CP. A novel virtual cycling training (VCT) program for lower limb was to enhance promising muscle strength through promoting the participant compliance and motivation. Sensory electrical stimulation(SES) of whole hand is a novel technique and is commonly used to treatment of spasticity for patients with stroke. Constraint-induced therapy (CIT) is a method for treating developmental disregard and learned non-use of affected limb and improving motor efficiency, functional performance, and activities of daily living for patients with CP.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study will proposed 3 novel protocols, including upper extremity (UE) VCT, UE SES, and virtual reality based CIT (VRCIT) in the treatment of upper limb dysfunction in patients with CP. investigators hypothesize that the functioning and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) will improve through biomechanical and physiological changes after different treatment protocols in patients with CP. The biomechanical and physiological changes varied depending on different treatment protocols. This project aims to: 1. the immediate effects of new protocols in these patients through biomechanical, physiological, and clinical measures; 2. the maintaining effects of new protocols in these patients through biomechanical, physiological, and clinical measures;3. the most effective treatment protocol; 3. the biomechanical and physiological mechanism underlying clinical improvement; and 5. the clinical predictors influencing the outcome for new protocols.

This 4-year project will recruit an estimated 92-100 patients with CP. A blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) study was designed. In the phase I (1st year), investigators will set-up the experimental protocols and perform pilot study. Twenty patients will be randomized into 4 groups: SES, VCT, VRCIT, and shame control groups. In the phase II (2nd -3rd year), 36-40 patients will be randomized into 2 groups: SES and shame control groups. In the phase III (3rd -4th year), 36-40 patients will be randomized into 2 groups:VCT and VRCIT groups. The outcome measures include biomechanical, physiological (muscle tone, muscle strength and endurance, kinematics, bone density, body compositions, metabolism), and clinical assessments, including functioning (motor impairment, movement and participation) and HRQOL, based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. The outcome measures will be administered at before, immediately after 12-week intervention, and 3-month follow-up assessments.

This project is significant for the translational and evidence-based medicine on CP neurorehabilitation. The research will offer valuable biomechanical and physiological biomarker that support motor control models proposed to account for motor problems and new protocol intervention in these patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cerebral Palsy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SES group

SES group received the SES training in addition to traditional rehabilitation. Each SES session involved electrical stimulation followed by UE training in addition to home program.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SES

Intervention Type DEVICE

SES group received the SES training in addition to traditional rehabilitation. Each SES session involved electrical stimulation followed by UE training in addition to home program.The novel SES programs were conducted three times per week, for 12 weeks. Each SES session involved electrical stimulation followed by UE training in addition to home program. The SES was applied to the forearm and whole hand with mesh glove for 20-30 minutes and arm with wrap for 20-30 minutes. The pulse width was set to 300 us for all stimulation levels. The frequency was set to 40-50 Hz.

VCT group

VCT group received the VCT training in addition to traditional rehabilitation.Each UE VCT session involved upper limb cycling training followed by UE training in addition to home program. The cycling program consisted of a warm-up exercise, twenty repetitions of hand push-up movements in the sitting position, UE cycling, and a cool-down exercise.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

VCT

Intervention Type DEVICE

The UE VCT programs were conducted three times per week, for 12 weeks. Each UE VCT session involved upper limb cycling training followed by UE training in addition to home program. The cycling program consisted of a warm-up exercise, twenty repetitions of hand push-up movements in the sitting position, UE cycling, and a cool-down exercise. The warm-up and cool-down exercises involved stretching and relaxing the head, neck, and the upper and lower body.

VRCIT group

VRCIT group received the VRCIT training in addition to traditional rehabilitation.Each VRCIT session involved practice of functional tasks with the more affected UE followed by virtual-reality based eye-hand coordination tasks with the more affected UE for, in addition to home program, and restraint of the less affected UE for 3.5 to 4 hours per day.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

VRCIT

Intervention Type DEVICE

VRCIT group received the VRCIT training in addition to traditional rehabilitation, conducted three times per week, for 12 weeks. Each VRCIT session involved practice of functional tasks with the more affected UE followed by virtual-reality based eye-hand coordination tasks with the more affected UE for, in addition to home program, and restraint of the less affected UE for 3.5 to 4 hours per day. The functional training of the more affected UE focused on massive practice of functional activities using the more affected arm, with the principles of shaping and repetitive task practice applied during training.

traditional rehabilitation group

Shame control group received the shame SES and traditional rehabilitation programs.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

traditional rehabilitation program

Intervention Type DEVICE

The absence of muscle contractions was controlled by the investigator the sham stimulation was carried out identically, but the stimulation amplitude was set to 0 milliampere(mA). Subjects were not informed about the stimulation level and were instructed to distract attention from the stimulation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SES

SES group received the SES training in addition to traditional rehabilitation. Each SES session involved electrical stimulation followed by UE training in addition to home program.The novel SES programs were conducted three times per week, for 12 weeks. Each SES session involved electrical stimulation followed by UE training in addition to home program. The SES was applied to the forearm and whole hand with mesh glove for 20-30 minutes and arm with wrap for 20-30 minutes. The pulse width was set to 300 us for all stimulation levels. The frequency was set to 40-50 Hz.

Intervention Type DEVICE

VCT

The UE VCT programs were conducted three times per week, for 12 weeks. Each UE VCT session involved upper limb cycling training followed by UE training in addition to home program. The cycling program consisted of a warm-up exercise, twenty repetitions of hand push-up movements in the sitting position, UE cycling, and a cool-down exercise. The warm-up and cool-down exercises involved stretching and relaxing the head, neck, and the upper and lower body.

Intervention Type DEVICE

VRCIT

VRCIT group received the VRCIT training in addition to traditional rehabilitation, conducted three times per week, for 12 weeks. Each VRCIT session involved practice of functional tasks with the more affected UE followed by virtual-reality based eye-hand coordination tasks with the more affected UE for, in addition to home program, and restraint of the less affected UE for 3.5 to 4 hours per day. The functional training of the more affected UE focused on massive practice of functional activities using the more affected arm, with the principles of shaping and repetitive task practice applied during training.

Intervention Type DEVICE

traditional rehabilitation program

The absence of muscle contractions was controlled by the investigator the sham stimulation was carried out identically, but the stimulation amplitude was set to 0 milliampere(mA). Subjects were not informed about the stimulation level and were instructed to distract attention from the stimulation.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

novel sensory electrical stimulation program The upper extremity programsvirtual cycling training program virtual reality based Constraint-induced therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. diagnosis with spastic CP with Gross Motor Function Classification System(GMFCS) levels I-IV
2. aged 3-20 years
3. ability to undergo clinical assessment
4. ability to comprehend commands and cooperate during an examination

Exclusion Criteria

1. chromosomal abnormalities
2. progressive neurological disorder or severe concurrent illness or disease not typically associated with CP
3. active medical conditions such as pneumonia or poor physical conditions that would interfere with participation
4. any major surgery or nerve block in the preceding 3 months
5. metabolic or hormonal disturbance
6. cardiovascular disorder
7. poor tolerance or a poor cooperation during assessment
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Chia-Ling Chen, MD,PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Taoyuan District, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

101-5261A3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.