Enhanced Lung Protective Ventilation for ARDS Patients With PrismaLung

NCT ID: NCT03004885

Last Updated: 2018-03-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-12

Study Completion Date

2017-12-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) still remains associated with a mortality rate of 30 - 45 % despite improvement in mechanical ventilation. Driving pressure, defined as the difference between the end-inspiratory and the end-expiratory airway pressure, appears as an important factor contributing to mortality in patients with the ARDS. In patients already receiving a conventional tidal volume of 6 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW), a driving pressure ≥ 14 cmH2O increases the risk of death in the hospital. One mean to lower the driving pressure is to decrease the tidal volume such that from 6 to 4 ml/kg predicted body weight. However, this strategy promotes hypercarbia by reducing the alveolar ventilation, providing the respiratory rate is constant. In this setting, implementing an extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R) therapy may offset the associated hypercarbia. The investigators have previously demonstrated that combining a membrane oxygenator within an hemofiltration circuit provides efficacious low flow ECCO2R on a renal replacement therapy monitor. In this study, we thought to investigate the efficacy of the PrismaLung stand-alone therapy. Using a PrismaFlex monitor and a HP-X circuit, a neonatal membrane oxygenator (PrismaLung) is used to provide decarboxylation without renal replacement therapy. The study will consist in three periods:

* The first period will address the efficacy of the PrismaLung device at tidal volume of 6 and 4 ml/kg PBW using an off-on-off design.
* The second part of the study will investigate the effect of varying the sweep gas flow and the mixture of the sweep gas on the CO2 removal rate (random order).
* The third part will compare three ventilatory strategies applied in a cross-over design :

1. Minimal distension: Tidal volume 4 ml/kg PBW and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) based on the ARDSNet PEEP/FiO2 table (ARMA).
2. Maximal recruitment: 4 ml/kg PBW and PEEP adjusted to maintain a plateau pressure between 23 - 25 cmH2O.
3. Standard: Tidal volume 6 ml/kg and PEEP based on the ARDSNet PEEP/FiO2 table (ARMA).

Each strategies will be apply in a random order for a duration of 22 hours. Pulmonary inflammatory and fibrosis pathway will be assess before and after each period using bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples. Systemic inflammatory cytokines will also be investigate. Main measurements will include respiratory mechanics, transpulmonary pressure, work of breathing, end-expiratory lung volume and tidal ventilation using electrical impedance tomography.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Minimal Distension

Tidal volume 4 ml/kg PBW and PEEP based on the ARDSNet PEEP/FiO2 table (ARMA) + ECCO2R

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PrismaLung

Intervention Type DEVICE

Low flow Extracorporeal CO2 removal using a 0.32 m² membrane oxygenator

Maximal Recruitment

Tidal volume 4 ml/kg PBW and PEEP adjusted to maintain plateau pressure between 23 - 25 cmH2O + ECCO2R

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PrismaLung

Intervention Type DEVICE

Low flow Extracorporeal CO2 removal using a 0.32 m² membrane oxygenator

Standard

Tidal volume 6 ml/kg PBW and PEEP based on the ARDSNet PEEP/FiO2 table (ARMA) without ECCO2R

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PrismaLung

Intervention Type DEVICE

Low flow Extracorporeal CO2 removal using a 0.32 m² membrane oxygenator

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PrismaLung

Low flow Extracorporeal CO2 removal using a 0.32 m² membrane oxygenator

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ARDS moderate or severe (Berlin criteria)
* Onset \< 48 h
* Driving pressure ≥ 14 cmH2O

Exclusion Criteria

* Lack of consent or social protection
* Chronic respiratory failure (requiring Oxygen or NIPPV)
* Severe hypoxemia: PaO2/FIO2 \< 100 with PEEP ≥ 18 cmH2O AND FIO2 = 1
* Acute Renal Failure requiring RRT
* DNR order or death expected within the next 72 hours
* Planned surgery or out-of-ICU transportation expected within the next 72 hours
* Heparin allergy
* Contraindication to jugular vein catheterization
* Intracranial Hypertension
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hôpital Européen Marseille

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jerome Allardet-Servent, MD

MD, MSc

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hopital Europeen Marseille

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, van Haren F, Larsson A, McAuley DF, Ranieri M, Rubenfeld G, Thompson BT, Wrigge H, Slutsky AS, Pesenti A; LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group. Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):788-800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26903337 (View on PubMed)

Amato MB, Meade MO, Slutsky AS, Brochard L, Costa EL, Schoenfeld DA, Stewart TE, Briel M, Talmor D, Mercat A, Richard JC, Carvalho CR, Brower RG. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 19;372(8):747-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1410639.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25693014 (View on PubMed)

Allardet-Servent J, Castanier M, Signouret T, Soundaravelou R, Lepidi A, Seghboyan JM. Safety and Efficacy of Combined Extracorporeal CO2 Removal and Renal Replacement Therapy in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Acute Kidney Injury: The Pulmonary and Renal Support in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Study. Crit Care Med. 2015 Dec;43(12):2570-81. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001296.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26488219 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016-A01523-48

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.