Epidemiology and Prognosis of ARDS After Pulmonary Resection Surgery

NCT ID: NCT04818554

Last Updated: 2021-03-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-01

Study Completion Date

2021-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The improvement in ARDS mortality over the last 20 years seems to be largely explained by the reduction of mechanical ventilation-induced injury (VILI). VILI is essentially related to volotrauma closely associated with "strain" and "stress". The pulmonary stress corresponds to the transpulmonary pressure (alveolar pressure - pleural pressure), and the strain to the change in lung volume related to the functional residual capacity (FRC) of the injured lung at PEEP = 0. The volotrauma corresponds therefore to the generalized excess of stress and strain on the injured lung.

The initial therapeutic strategy consists in protective ventilation with a tidal volume of 6 ml/kg of theoretical ideal weight (predicted by height), associated with a high respiratory rate between 25 and 30 cycles per minute to control PaCO2 (\< 50 mmHg), apply a high positive expiratory pressure PEEP according to FiO2, maintain a plateau pressure (PP) lower than 30 cmH20, reduce instrumental dead space, use curarization, recruitment maneuvers such as alternate prone, improve ventilation-perfusion adequacy using inhaled NO.

As a last resort, extracorporeal oxygenation by veno-venous ECMO is a device to supplement respiratory function by improving oxygenation and ensuring decarboxylation. Veno-venous ECMO is indicated in severe ARDS with PaO2/FiO2 \< 80 mmHg and/or when mechanical ventilation becomes unsafe due to increased plateau pressure despite optimized ARDS management including high PEEP levels, curarization and prone position.

After lung resection surgery, the incidence of ARDS is 2-8% and its prognosis remains more poor, despite advances in management, with a mortality of up to 60%. Risk factors include intraoperative vascular filling, type of pulmonary resection, and predicted postoperative respiratory function. Early support with VV ECMO is vital in some patients to treat severe hypoxemia, due to variable surgical reduction of lung parenchyma depending on carcinological involvement or initial lung pathology. ). There are very few data concerning these patients with pulmonary resection. The primary objective of this study is to describe the prevalence of ARDS and the risk factors for its occurrence after pulmonary resection surgery. The secondary objective is to compare the ventilation parameters (especially motor pressure) in patients with reduced lung parenchyma in ARDS under VV ECMO with those who did not use VV ECMO assistance.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Thoracic Pulmonary Restrictive Disease ARDS

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Thoracic surgery ARDS Pulmonary resection Ventilation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- Patient hospitalized following ARDS after thoracic resection surgery

Exclusion Criteria

\- Refusal to participate after receiving the information letter
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Montpellier

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

hélène David, PHD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

UH MONTPELLIER

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UH Montpellier

Montpellier, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Hélène David, PHD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 629834346

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

hélène David, PhD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RECHMPL21_0191

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id