Acceptable Range of Inspiratory Effort During Mechanical Ventilation

NCT ID: NCT02838524

Last Updated: 2018-04-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

43 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-09-30

Study Completion Date

2018-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Partially assisted mechanical ventilation is ideally titrated to maintain adequate inspiratory muscle activity (i.e. preventing disuse atrophy) while avoiding excessive (i.e. fatiguing) inspiratory loads. The advent of ventilator modes enabling flow and pressure assistance in proportion to patient inspiratory effort (i.e. Proportional Assist Ventilation (PAV), Neurally-Adjusted Ventilator Assist (NAVA)) permit careful titration of ventilatory support to achieve desired levels of patient inspiratory effort. However, data on the acceptable range of values for inspiratory effort and respiratory muscle load-capacity balance during mechanical ventilation are currently very limited. Such data are critical to inform a physiologically sound evidence-based approach to titrating partially-assisted ventilatory support. This study is designed to ascertain a physiologically acceptable range of inspiratory effort in mechanically ventilated patients. The study protocol includes measurements of the respiratory system during spontaneous breathing as well as evaluating the diaphragm in real-time with the use of ultrasonography. The experimental design outlined in the present study is predicated on the assumption that the range of values for inspiratory effort and load-capacity balance observed in patients who are successfully weaned from mechanical ventilation represent the safe and appropriate range of target values.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Elective Cardiac Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- Adult patients (\>17) receiving invasive mechanical ventilation following elective cardiac surgery who will undergo a trial of spontaneous breathing

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women
* Decompensated cardiac insufficiency or acute coronary syndrome
* Severe COPD
* Contraindications to esophageal catheter placement, namely known esophageal varices
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Unity Health Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St. Michael's Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tobin MJ, Laghi F, Jubran A. Narrative review: ventilator-induced respiratory muscle weakness. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Aug 17;153(4):240-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-4-201008170-00006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20713792 (View on PubMed)

Carteaux G, Mancebo J, Mercat A, Dellamonica J, Richard JC, Aguirre-Bermeo H, Kouatchet A, Beduneau G, Thille AW, Brochard L. Bedside adjustment of proportional assist ventilation to target a predefined range of respiratory effort. Crit Care Med. 2013 Sep;41(9):2125-32. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a42e5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23787397 (View on PubMed)

Akoumianaki E, Maggiore SM, Valenza F, Bellani G, Jubran A, Loring SH, Pelosi P, Talmor D, Grasso S, Chiumello D, Guerin C, Patroniti N, Ranieri VM, Gattinoni L, Nava S, Terragni PP, Pesenti A, Tobin M, Mancebo J, Brochard L; PLUG Working Group (Acute Respiratory Failure Section of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine). The application of esophageal pressure measurement in patients with respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Mar 1;189(5):520-31. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201312-2193CI.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24467647 (View on PubMed)

Vassilakopoulos T, Zakynthinos S, Roussos C. The tension-time index and the frequency/tidal volume ratio are the major pathophysiologic determinants of weaning failure and success. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Aug;158(2):378-85. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.2.9710084.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9700110 (View on PubMed)

Thille AW, Richard JC, Brochard L. The decision to extubate in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Jun 15;187(12):1294-302. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201208-1523CI.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23641924 (View on PubMed)

Baydur A, Behrakis PK, Zin WA, Jaeger M, Milic-Emili J. A simple method for assessing the validity of the esophageal balloon technique. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982 Nov;126(5):788-91. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1982.126.5.788.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7149443 (View on PubMed)

Goligher EC, Laghi F, Detsky ME, Farias P, Murray A, Brace D, Brochard LJ, Bolz SS, Rubenfeld GD, Kavanagh BP, Ferguson ND. Measuring diaphragm thickness with ultrasound in mechanically ventilated patients: feasibility, reproducibility and validity. Intensive Care Med. 2015 Apr;41(4):642-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3687-3. Epub 2015 Feb 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25693448 (View on PubMed)

Lerolle N, Guerot E, Dimassi S, Zegdi R, Faisy C, Fagon JY, Diehl JL. Ultrasonographic diagnostic criterion for severe diaphragmatic dysfunction after cardiac surgery. Chest. 2009 Feb;135(2):401-407. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-1531. Epub 2008 Aug 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18753469 (View on PubMed)

Jubran A, Tobin MJ. Pathophysiologic basis of acute respiratory distress in patients who fail a trial of weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Mar;155(3):906-15. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.155.3.9117025.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9117025 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REB# 15-369

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ventilator Mode and Respiratory Physiology
NCT06624254 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION