Comparison of Two Methods for Assessing Cough Capacity in Intensive Care Unit After Cardiac Surgery
NCT ID: NCT03983044
Last Updated: 2020-01-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
44 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-10-09
2019-07-09
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* left heart dysfunction with LVEF \< 30%.
* an ineffective cough
* presence of resuscitation neuromyopathy
* mechanical ventilation time \>7 days
* presence of a delirium
* age \>65 years old
* abundant bronchial secretion
* presence of underlying lung pathology An ineffective cough is found in 40% of patients requiring reintubation. However, cough assessment is most often approximate, based on a subjective assessment of cough strength by asking the patient to cough spontaneously on his or her tube).
The objective evaluation of cough is based on the measurement of the peak expiratory flow rate at cough, commonly referred to as peak expiratory flow rate at cough (PEFD), the patient is asked to take a deep breath and then cough as hard as possible.
Subjective cough assessment does not predict the occurrence of ventilatory withdrawal failure. Conversely, all studies that objectively assessed the strength of cough before extubation by measuring the PEFD found a significant association with the outcome of extubation: a low PEFD increases the risk of extubation failure by a factor of 5 to 9.
The investigators hypothesize that the increase in parietal abdominal muscle contraction obtained by using a non-invasive ultrasound method indicates an effective cough. Conversely, an ineffective cough can be detected by this simple ultrasound criterion, which can be performed at the patient's bedside and extrapolated to all intensive care units equipped with an ultrasound scanner. This evaluation will be carried out before extubation: during the spontaneous ventilation test on a tube in a half-seated position (\>45°) and within 24 hours after extubation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Respiratory Weaning Following Cardiac Surgery.
NCT02821429
Lung and Heart USG for Predicting Weaning in Neurosurgical Patients
NCT03580993
Evaluation of the Alveolar Recruitment Obtained During Non-invasive Ventilation After Cardiac Surgery
NCT02804997
Heart Rate Variability During Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation
NCT00851825
Comparison Between CPAP and HFJV During One-lung Ventilation in VATS
NCT03296449
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Recent history of stroke(\<6 months )
* Minor patient
* Neurological disorder (Alzheimer's disease, delirium, confusion)
* Emphysemal patient
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue
Le Plessis-Robinson, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2018-A01114-51
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.