Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-07-31
2017-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hand Grip Strength and Medical Research Council Scale as Predictors of Weaning Failure
NCT03991702
Correlation Between Maximal Inspiratory Pressure and Hand Grip Force
NCT02423616
Evaluation of the Strength of Handgrip in Patients With Pulmonary Artery Hypertension
NCT05447390
Evaluation and Training of Muscle Fitness in Pre-frail Individuals
NCT02122653
Normative Values for Peripheral Muscle Strength in Critical Patients and Healthy Individuals
NCT06296381
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The medical notes for the patients in the first 1-3 beds in each bay in the 5 wards will be examined (approximately 54 records). Basic information about the patient such as: age, gender, date of admission, domicile status, and reasons for admission will be first extracted. Then investigators will check the records to extract any information within the first 2-3 days of admission about risk assessment measures and what could indicate risk factors for poor healthcare outcomes. In addition, the number of and reasons for referrals weekly for the last 3 months to the dietetic team will be abstracted from the E-referral system. The number of prescribed oral nutritional supplements (ONS) will be also calculated weekly for the last 3 months from the electronic prescribing system. These figures are important for later analysis and comparison in order to assess changes in routine practice.
The second part of the research involves developing a training programme on measuring GS and creation of a care plan for older patients with low GS levels. Then, the nursing, medical and therapy staff in 5 wards in the MOP department will be trained in the measurement of grip strength and interpretation of grip strength values. There are approximately 150 nursing staff in MOP across the 5 wards, all of whom will be trained over a period of 3 months in GS measurement in groups of 5-10 each. Additional training sessions will be provided to junior doctors, consultants and therapy staff taking the opportunity to incorporate this into regular educational sessions where possible. The time and date of the training sessions will be defined and agreed liaising with the training lead in the MOP to avoid any disruption to the daily tasks of the MOP staff. The training session will last for approximately 1 hour. At the end of each session, participants will be asked to evaluate the training session using 5-points rating scale and give feedback. Nurses attending the training session will be asked as part of the training program to measure GS of a colleague according to the standard protocol as an assessment of their competency to measure GS of patients.
Implementation of GS should be start soon after completing the first training session in each ward. GS will be measured on all patients admitted to the MOP wards within 1-3 days of admission by a ward nurse. Only patients who are unable to squeeze the dynamometer handle such as patients with arthritis or who are very ill will be excluded. Grip strength will be measured by the ward nurse using a Jamar dynamometer by asking the patient to squeeze with each hand twice, starting with the right hand using the standardised protocol. A brief break of approximately 1 minute will be allowed between each squeeze. The maximum GS measurement will be recorded. A total of 5 Jamar dynamometers will be available for this study, one in each ward. The maximum GS values will be coded in two categories: score 1 representing values less than 27 kg for men and less than 16 kg for women which refers to patients at high risk of poor health outcomes, and score 2 representing values ≥27 kg for men and ≥16 kg for women representing lower risk. Patients who have low maximum GS values (men \< 27 kg and women \<16 kg) or those who are unable to perform the test will receive a care plan. The care plan will focus on review of dietary energy and protein intake and any need for oral nutritional supplements or dietetic review, and review of mobility with any need for physiotherapy review with regard to progressive resistance exercises to increase muscle strength.
During the implementation process, monitoring and evaluation of the outcomes of implementation which are referred to by the World Health Organisation (WHO) as "implementation outcome variables" will include assessing: acceptability of GS measurement, its adoption, coverage, fidelity, and costs.
Patients and staff acceptability will be assessed by conducting qualitative research (interviews or focus groups). A sample of 10-15 patients and 10-20 MOP staff is deemed to be enough to gain an understanding of their views and experience of GS measurement. Staff interviews will also assist understanding how GS routine implementation has been adopted and initiated in each of the five wards. Random weekly visits to MOP will be conducted to check fidelity and continuing staff competency on measuring GS as well as to audit the number of the number and proportion of patients who have their GS measured and those who have received a care plan in each ward. Coverage of GS implementation will be measured by calculating in the total number and proportion of patients who have their GS measured and those who have received a care plan in MOP within 6 months of routine implementation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Older inpatient at MOP
The group includes older patients who are admitted to one of the Medicine for Older Patients (MOP) wards. Grip strength will be part of the routine assessment of older patient when admitted to MOP.
Grip strength assessment
Grip strength will be measured by the ward nurse using a Jamar dynamometer by asking the patient to squeeze with each hand twice, starting with the right hand using the standardised protocol The maximum GS measurement will be recorded. Patients who have low maximum GS values (men \< 27 kg and women \<16 kg) or those who are unable to perform the test will receive a care plan. The care plan will focus on review of dietary energy and protein intake and any need for oral nutritional supplements or dietetic review, and review of mobility with any need for physiotherapy review with regard to progressive resistance exercises to increase muscle strength.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Grip strength assessment
Grip strength will be measured by the ward nurse using a Jamar dynamometer by asking the patient to squeeze with each hand twice, starting with the right hand using the standardised protocol The maximum GS measurement will be recorded. Patients who have low maximum GS values (men \< 27 kg and women \<16 kg) or those who are unable to perform the test will receive a care plan. The care plan will focus on review of dietary energy and protein intake and any need for oral nutritional supplements or dietetic review, and review of mobility with any need for physiotherapy review with regard to progressive resistance exercises to increase muscle strength.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Inclusion criteria will be older patients admitted to the MOP.
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria will be an inability to hold the dynamometer in either hand (eg pain and/or severe arthritis), inability to understand the explanation given (eg severe dementia or delirium), and terminal phase of illness.
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom
OTHER_GOV
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Helen Roberts, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University General Southampton UHS
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Southampton Genral Hospital
Southampton, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ibrahim K, May CR, Patel HP, Baxter M, Sayer AA, Roberts HC. Implementation of grip strength measurement in medicine for older people wards as part of routine admission assessment: identifying facilitators and barriers using a theory-led intervention. BMC Geriatr. 2018 Mar 22;18(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0768-5.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
the study main findings
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RHM MED1250
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.