Impact of Bed Availability and Cognitive Load on Intensive Care Unit Bed Allocation: a Vignette-based Clinical Trial

NCT ID: NCT02430454

Last Updated: 2016-01-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

178 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-04-30

Study Completion Date

2016-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Decisions about ICU beds allocations are made everyday, specially in countries with scarcity of ICU beds, such as Brazil. ICU triage, most of the time, is not structured, which may lead to faulty decision making, possibly leading to bad clinical outcomes. It has been shown that external factors may influence the decision making process. The investigators intend to evaluate the impact of bed availability and cognitive load on the ICU bed allocation process by submitting groups of individuals to a vignette based randomized controlled trial simulating conditions with or without increased cognitive load and conditions with or without scarcity of ICU beds.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Vignettes will be constructed based on consecutive patients for whom ICU bed was solicited. Vignettes will be validated through the evaluation of 8 experts in situations with or without bed scarcity. Vignettes with more than 80% concordance on ICU disposition (admission or refusion) will be used in the trial.

Intensive care doctors in Brazil will be asked to answer an online questionnaire with demographic characteristics and randomized to one of two groups. The experimental group will be submitted to increased cognitive load conditions, meaning that they will be encouraged to give their first impression on the vignettes, will have a time limit to answer the questions and will have popups with sound and videos, with the purpose to distract the respondents. The control group will be encouraged to think thoroughly and will have no time limit or distractions.

Vignettes will be presented, randomly, in conditions with or without scarcity of ICU beds to both groups. So, respondents with and without increased cognitive load will evaluate vignettes in conditions with and without scarcity of ICU beds.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

There Are no Specific Conditions Under Study This Study Evaluates the Clinical Decision-Making Associated With Intensive Care Units Rationing

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental

Subjected to increased cognitive load

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Increased cognitive load

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

simulated conditions to increase cognitive load: encourage first impression, time-limit, distractions

Control

Not subjected to increased cognitive load

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Increased cognitive load

simulated conditions to increase cognitive load: encourage first impression, time-limit, distractions

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Intensive care unit doctors participating in specialty email lists

Exclusion Criteria

* Consent not provided
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

João Gabriel Rosa Ramos

PhD Student

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Joao G Ramos, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

43084815.0.0000.0068

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Education Program for Burn Patients
NCT01379495 COMPLETED NA