Is it Necessary to Set External PEEP in AECOPD Patients
NCT ID: NCT02114567
Last Updated: 2014-07-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
12 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-01-31
2014-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Randomized Controlled Study of Programmed Weaning From NIV for AECOPD
NCT06014034
Effects of High-intensity Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in AECOPD
NCT04044625
Effect of Pressure Support Ventilation and Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients
NCT00568100
Respiratory Support in Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation
NCT03020394
Effects of NAVA and PSV to AECOPD Patients' Air Distribution and Dead Space
NCT02289573
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PSV ventilation
AECOPD Patients who were ventilated wiht PSV, PEEP was titrated and set at 0, 40%, 80% and 120% PEEPi. Pressure support was set to get the tidal volume of 6ml/kg.
PEEP titration
In both groups, PEEP was titrated and set to 0, 40%PEEPi, 80%PEEPi, and 120%PEEPi
NAVA ventilation
AECOPD patients who were ventilated with NAVA, PEEP was titrated and set at 0, 40%, 80% and 120% PEEPi. NAVA level was set to get the tidal volume of 6ml/kg.
PEEP titration
In both groups, PEEP was titrated and set to 0, 40%PEEPi, 80%PEEPi, and 120%PEEPi
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PEEP titration
In both groups, PEEP was titrated and set to 0, 40%PEEPi, 80%PEEPi, and 120%PEEPi
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Hemodynamics stability (heart rate \< 140 beats/min, no vasopressors required, or \<5 μg/kg/min dopamine) without any evidence
3. no sedation or on minimal sedation with low dose of morphine (\<3mg/h, by continuous intravenous infusion
4. Breathing spontaneously
5. Awake and with positive cooperate
Exclusion Criteria
2. treatment abandonment
3. history of esophageal varices
4. gastro-esophageal surgery in the previous 12 months or gastro-esophageal bleeding in the previous 30 days
5. coagulation disorders (INR ratio\>1.5 and Activated partial thromboplastin time \> 44 s)
6. history of acute central or peripheral nervous system disorder or severe neuromuscular disease
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Southeast University, China
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ling Liu
Dr.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
ling liu, md
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Nanjing Zhongda Hospital and School of Medicine, Southeast University, China
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nanjing Zhong-Da Hospital, Southeast University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Liu L, Xia F, Yang Y, Longhini F, Navalesi P, Beck J, Sinderby C, Qiu H. Neural versus pneumatic control of pressure support in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases at different levels of positive end expiratory pressure: a physiological study. Crit Care. 2015 Jun 9;19(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0971-0.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
COPDNAVA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.