Resect and Discard Approach to Diminutive Colonic Polyps

NCT ID: NCT01877525

Last Updated: 2013-06-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

618 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-10-31

Study Completion Date

2012-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Resect and discard (RD) is a new paradigm for management of diminutive colorectal polyps wherein histology is determined by real-time endoscopic imaging; polyps are then resected and discarded rather than sent for histopathological review. The aims of this study were to compare the surveillance recommendations between RD and the standard of care where polyps are sent for histopathological review in a mixed setting of academic and community gastroenterologists and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of an RD program for management of diminutive polyps.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Introduction: Diminutive (≤5 mm) colorectal polyps are prevalent in the screening population but have low risk for harboring advanced villous or dysplastic components and for developing into colorectal cancer. "Resect and discard" (RD) is a new paradigm for management of these diminutive polyps wherein histology is determined by real-time endoscopic imaging; polyps are then resected and discarded rather than sent for histopathological review.

Aim: The aim of this study were to compare the surveillance recommendations between RD and the standard of care where polyps are sent for histopathological review in a mixed setting of academic and community gastroenterologists and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of an RD program for management of diminutive polyps.

Methods: This is a prospective, observational study conducted in a single outpatient endoscopy center over 12 months. Screening and surveillance colonoscopies were performed by four academic and two community gastroenterologists. All diminutive polyps (defined as ≤5 mm) were endoscopically imaged and histology predictions (adenoma vs. non-adenomatous polyp) were made using high-definition white light (HDWL) with/without narrow band imaging (NBI) at the discretion of the endoscopist. Diagnostic performance and accordance of recommended surveillance intervals from endoscopic imaging were compared to histopathological review of the polyps.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Benign Polyps of Large Intestine

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

All patients in one cohort

Consecutive adult patients undergoing colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening or routine surveillance indications were prospectively enrolled between October 2011 and October 2012.

Colonoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The location, size, and morphology of all lesions detected during colonoscopy were recorded. The size of each identified polyp was visually estimated . All diminutive polyps (defined as ≤5 mm) were endoscopically imaged and histology predictions (adenoma vs. non-adenomatous polyp) were made using HDWL with/without NBI at the discretion of the endoscopist.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Colonoscopy

The location, size, and morphology of all lesions detected during colonoscopy were recorded. The size of each identified polyp was visually estimated . All diminutive polyps (defined as ≤5 mm) were endoscopically imaged and histology predictions (adenoma vs. non-adenomatous polyp) were made using HDWL with/without NBI at the discretion of the endoscopist.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients were included if diminutive polyps (defined as ≤5 mm) were identified at colonoscopy.

Exclusion Criteria

* indication other than screening or surveillance
* no diminutive polyps were found
* an optical or histopathological diagnosis of the diminutive polyp could not be made
* the polyp was resected but not retrieved for histopathology
* a synchronous colorectal cancer was identified at the time of the colonoscopy
* polyposis syndrome
* inflammatory bowel disease
* colonoscopies not complete to cecum
* fair or poor bowel preparation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Washington University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dayna Early, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Washington University School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Washington University Center for Advanced Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

201105473

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.