Resect and Discard Approach to Diminutive Colonic Polyps
NCT ID: NCT01877525
Last Updated: 2013-06-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
618 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2011-10-31
2012-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Patient Preferences of a Resect and Discard Paradigm
NCT02305251
Resect and Discard Strategy in Clinical Practice
NCT01462123
Evaluation of Colonic Diminutive Polyps With Electronic Filters
NCT02711475
Accuracy of the Optical Diagnosis of Small Colonic Polyps Using the Nice Classification
NCT02009774
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Resection of Small Pedunculated Polyps
NCT06097650
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim: The aim of this study were to compare the surveillance recommendations between RD and the standard of care where polyps are sent for histopathological review in a mixed setting of academic and community gastroenterologists and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of an RD program for management of diminutive polyps.
Methods: This is a prospective, observational study conducted in a single outpatient endoscopy center over 12 months. Screening and surveillance colonoscopies were performed by four academic and two community gastroenterologists. All diminutive polyps (defined as ≤5 mm) were endoscopically imaged and histology predictions (adenoma vs. non-adenomatous polyp) were made using high-definition white light (HDWL) with/without narrow band imaging (NBI) at the discretion of the endoscopist. Diagnostic performance and accordance of recommended surveillance intervals from endoscopic imaging were compared to histopathological review of the polyps.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
All patients in one cohort
Consecutive adult patients undergoing colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening or routine surveillance indications were prospectively enrolled between October 2011 and October 2012.
Colonoscopy
The location, size, and morphology of all lesions detected during colonoscopy were recorded. The size of each identified polyp was visually estimated . All diminutive polyps (defined as ≤5 mm) were endoscopically imaged and histology predictions (adenoma vs. non-adenomatous polyp) were made using HDWL with/without NBI at the discretion of the endoscopist.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Colonoscopy
The location, size, and morphology of all lesions detected during colonoscopy were recorded. The size of each identified polyp was visually estimated . All diminutive polyps (defined as ≤5 mm) were endoscopically imaged and histology predictions (adenoma vs. non-adenomatous polyp) were made using HDWL with/without NBI at the discretion of the endoscopist.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* no diminutive polyps were found
* an optical or histopathological diagnosis of the diminutive polyp could not be made
* the polyp was resected but not retrieved for histopathology
* a synchronous colorectal cancer was identified at the time of the colonoscopy
* polyposis syndrome
* inflammatory bowel disease
* colonoscopies not complete to cecum
* fair or poor bowel preparation
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Washington University School of Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dayna Early, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Washington University School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Washington University Center for Advanced Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
201105473
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.