High Definition Endoscopy With i-Scan for Small Colonic Polyp Evaluation: The HiScope Study
NCT ID: NCT01761279
Last Updated: 2013-04-04
Study Results
Results available
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Total Enrollment
84 participants
Study Classification
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Start Date
2011-05-31
Study Completion Date
2012-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Current standard practice is to remove all colonic polyps found during colonoscopy as it has not been possible to distinguish between polyps with some malignant potential (adenomatous) and those with negligable malignant potential (non-adenomatous).
Recent advances in endoscope imaging and technology have allowed endoscopists to distinguish between these two types of polyps by examining minute surface details.
i-Scan is a new digital enhancement method that aims to enhance surface details and may enable similar accurate distinction between adenomatous and non-adenomatous polyps.
Hypothesis:
High definition white light endoscopy plus i-Scan improves diagnostic accuracy of in-vivo assessment of colonic polyps \<10mm in size over high definition white light endoscopy alone.
Recent advances in endoscope imaging and technology have allowed endoscopists to distinguish between these two types of polyps by examining minute surface details.
i-Scan is a new digital enhancement method that aims to enhance surface details and may enable similar accurate distinction between adenomatous and non-adenomatous polyps.
Hypothesis:
High definition white light endoscopy plus i-Scan improves diagnostic accuracy of in-vivo assessment of colonic polyps \<10mm in size over high definition white light endoscopy alone.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Discard:Characterisation of Colonic Polyps in Vivo
NCT00888771
Colorectal Polyps
COMPLETED
The Accuracy of Human Endoscopic Detection of Submucosal Invasive Cancer in Colorectal Polyps
NCT05191095
Colorectal Polyp
COMPLETED
Detection and Classification of Colon Polyps
NCT00825292
Colon Polyps
COMPLETED
PHASE2
Evaluation of Colonic Diminutive Polyps With Electronic Filters
NCT02711475
Colonic Polyps
UNKNOWN
I-scan for Adenoma Detection
NCT02811419
Colorectal Adenomatous Polyps
COMPLETED
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Traditionally all polyps detected at colonoscopy, except obvious cancers, have been removed. It is felt that small (\<10mm diameter) hyperplastic polyps cannot be reliably distinguished from adenomatous polyps by endoscopists \[1\]. Therefore a large number of hyperplastic polyps are removed unnecessarily. This results in increased risk to patients through exposing them to unnecessary polypectomy, and increased cost to the health service through the cost of processing greater numbers of histopathology specimens. The cost per specimen is around £58.
This challenge of distinguishing small hyperplastic polyps from small adenomatous polyps has been met over the past decade through the use of novel chromoendoscopy and computed 'virtual chromoendoscopy' techniques.
Chromoendoscopy involves using staining or contrast dyes to highlight the minute surface patterns in the mucosa of the gastrointestinal tract. The dyes are applied to the colonic mucosa via the working channels of the endoscope. Vital stains such as cresyl violet and methylene blue, which are taken up into epithelial cells, have been used by Japanese endoscopists for many years. Work by Kudo et al showed that by using these stains in combination with magnification endoscopy the minute 'pit patterns' of colonic mucosal lesions could be precisely examined and classified. The pits described are the surface opening of the mucosal crypts. Kudo showed that the surface pit pattern could predict the histology of a lesion with high accuracy \[2-4\], enabling distinction between adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps. Concerns regarding potential harmful effects of vital stains increased the popularity of an alternative chromoendoscopy dye, indigocarmine \[5\]. Indigocarmine is not taken up by cells but lies on the colonic wall. Studies from East Asia, the USA and Europe published in the early part of the last decade showed that by combining indigocarmine and magnification endoscopy, neoplastic colonic polyps (adenomas) could be distinguished from non-neoplastic hyperplastic polyps with accuracy rates of 68-96% \[6-10\]. By the same method, surface patterns could also identify small early colorectal cancers\[11\] . Subsequent studies demonstrated that indigocarmine could adequately distinguish between adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps without the need for optical magnification \[12-15\].
During the past few years new methods of closely examining lesions within the colon have been developed. Digital imaging techniques or 'virtual chromoendoscopy' systems have been developed by endoscope manufacturers as a 'push-button' alternative to chromoendoscopy dyes, being potentially simpler and quicker to use. The first of these novel technologies available was the narrow band imaging (NBI) system produced by Olympus. A filter within the endoscope selects out narrow bandwidths of blue and green light, and thus reduces red light. These wavelengths penetrate only the superficial layers of the mucosa, highlighting surface patterns and microvasculature. Adenomatous polyps have more numerous and prominent microvessels in comparison to hyperplastic poylps. This system has been shown to be effective in differentiating small hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps with accuracies of 91 - 94% \[16-23\].
The Fujinon Intelligent Colour Enhancement (FICE) system developed by Fujinon uses post-processor electronic colour filter technology to allow a range of filter images with different wavelengths of light to be viewed. Similar results to NBI have been achieved in the characterisation of small polyps \[13, 24, 25\].
More recently a further virtual chromoendoscopy system, i-Scan has been developed by Pentax. i-Scan identifies areas of contrast between adjacent pixels (ie light bordering dark) and enhances this contrast. Additionally in a similar method to FICE, post-processor manipulation of the red, green and blue components of the spectrum is used to enhance vessels and surface structures.
A single study from Germany has suggested that i-Scan improves the detection of lesions during flexible sigmoidoscopy and can accurately predict histology. There is a need for further data on the clinical efficacy of i-Scan in the assessment of colonic polyps, particularly in a UK population and in a bowel cancer screening population, neither of which have been studied to date.
Through the use of these new technologies it may be possible to accurately predict the histology of small polyps in real time. Once an in-vivo diagnosis has been made with high confidence it may be possible for small hyperplastic polyps to be discarded, rather than sent for histological analysis, or to be left in situ \[22\]. This has potential benefits in reducing the frequency and consequent risk of polypectomy for patients and could also reduce pathology costs. UK and US guidelines for repeat surveillance colonoscopy after adenomas are detected at baseline examination are based on the number and size and histology of adenomas \[26, 27\]. At present these 'rescope intervals' are determined once the histology report of any resected polyps is received. With accurate in-vivo diagnosis these intervals may be set immediately after the baseline colonoscopy has been completed.
Whilst the development of these endoscopic advanced imaging technologies is to be welcomed, it is important for studies to determine what can be achieved through their use, over and above standard white-light colonoscopy. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy has identified the utility of technologies used in the real-time assessment of diminutive (\<5mm) colonic polyps as a key area for study, and has published guidelines on the minimum standards which new endoscopic technologies should meet before their use becomes widely adopted \[28\].
We aim to evaluate HDWL and HDWL + i-Scan for the real time assessment and prediction of histology of small colonic polyps in a BCSP population.
This challenge of distinguishing small hyperplastic polyps from small adenomatous polyps has been met over the past decade through the use of novel chromoendoscopy and computed 'virtual chromoendoscopy' techniques.
Chromoendoscopy involves using staining or contrast dyes to highlight the minute surface patterns in the mucosa of the gastrointestinal tract. The dyes are applied to the colonic mucosa via the working channels of the endoscope. Vital stains such as cresyl violet and methylene blue, which are taken up into epithelial cells, have been used by Japanese endoscopists for many years. Work by Kudo et al showed that by using these stains in combination with magnification endoscopy the minute 'pit patterns' of colonic mucosal lesions could be precisely examined and classified. The pits described are the surface opening of the mucosal crypts. Kudo showed that the surface pit pattern could predict the histology of a lesion with high accuracy \[2-4\], enabling distinction between adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps. Concerns regarding potential harmful effects of vital stains increased the popularity of an alternative chromoendoscopy dye, indigocarmine \[5\]. Indigocarmine is not taken up by cells but lies on the colonic wall. Studies from East Asia, the USA and Europe published in the early part of the last decade showed that by combining indigocarmine and magnification endoscopy, neoplastic colonic polyps (adenomas) could be distinguished from non-neoplastic hyperplastic polyps with accuracy rates of 68-96% \[6-10\]. By the same method, surface patterns could also identify small early colorectal cancers\[11\] . Subsequent studies demonstrated that indigocarmine could adequately distinguish between adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps without the need for optical magnification \[12-15\].
During the past few years new methods of closely examining lesions within the colon have been developed. Digital imaging techniques or 'virtual chromoendoscopy' systems have been developed by endoscope manufacturers as a 'push-button' alternative to chromoendoscopy dyes, being potentially simpler and quicker to use. The first of these novel technologies available was the narrow band imaging (NBI) system produced by Olympus. A filter within the endoscope selects out narrow bandwidths of blue and green light, and thus reduces red light. These wavelengths penetrate only the superficial layers of the mucosa, highlighting surface patterns and microvasculature. Adenomatous polyps have more numerous and prominent microvessels in comparison to hyperplastic poylps. This system has been shown to be effective in differentiating small hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps with accuracies of 91 - 94% \[16-23\].
The Fujinon Intelligent Colour Enhancement (FICE) system developed by Fujinon uses post-processor electronic colour filter technology to allow a range of filter images with different wavelengths of light to be viewed. Similar results to NBI have been achieved in the characterisation of small polyps \[13, 24, 25\].
More recently a further virtual chromoendoscopy system, i-Scan has been developed by Pentax. i-Scan identifies areas of contrast between adjacent pixels (ie light bordering dark) and enhances this contrast. Additionally in a similar method to FICE, post-processor manipulation of the red, green and blue components of the spectrum is used to enhance vessels and surface structures.
A single study from Germany has suggested that i-Scan improves the detection of lesions during flexible sigmoidoscopy and can accurately predict histology. There is a need for further data on the clinical efficacy of i-Scan in the assessment of colonic polyps, particularly in a UK population and in a bowel cancer screening population, neither of which have been studied to date.
Through the use of these new technologies it may be possible to accurately predict the histology of small polyps in real time. Once an in-vivo diagnosis has been made with high confidence it may be possible for small hyperplastic polyps to be discarded, rather than sent for histological analysis, or to be left in situ \[22\]. This has potential benefits in reducing the frequency and consequent risk of polypectomy for patients and could also reduce pathology costs. UK and US guidelines for repeat surveillance colonoscopy after adenomas are detected at baseline examination are based on the number and size and histology of adenomas \[26, 27\]. At present these 'rescope intervals' are determined once the histology report of any resected polyps is received. With accurate in-vivo diagnosis these intervals may be set immediately after the baseline colonoscopy has been completed.
Whilst the development of these endoscopic advanced imaging technologies is to be welcomed, it is important for studies to determine what can be achieved through their use, over and above standard white-light colonoscopy. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy has identified the utility of technologies used in the real-time assessment of diminutive (\<5mm) colonic polyps as a key area for study, and has published guidelines on the minimum standards which new endoscopic technologies should meet before their use becomes widely adopted \[28\].
We aim to evaluate HDWL and HDWL + i-Scan for the real time assessment and prediction of histology of small colonic polyps in a BCSP population.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Colonic Polyps
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Observational Model Type
COHORT
Study Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
High definition white light endoscopy
Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients found to have colonic polyps up to 10mm in size
Exclusion Criteria
* Poor bowel preparation
* Inflammatory bowel disease
* Polyposis syndrome
* Inflammatory bowel disease
* Polyposis syndrome
Minimum Eligible Age
60 Years
Maximum Eligible Age
74 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust
OTHER_GOV
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Pradeep Bhandari
Professor of Gastroenterology
Responsibility Role
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pradeep Bhandari, MBBS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Norfleet RG, Ryan ME, Wyman JB. Adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps cannot be reliably distinguished by their appearance through the fiberoptic sigmoidoscope. Dig Dis Sci. 1988 Sep;33(9):1175-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01535796.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kudo S, Hirota S, Nakajima T, Hosobe S, Kusaka H, Kobayashi T, Himori M, Yagyuu A. Colorectal tumours and pit pattern. J Clin Pathol. 1994 Oct;47(10):880-5. doi: 10.1136/jcp.47.10.880.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kudo S, Rubio CA, Teixeira CR, Kashida H, Kogure E. Pit pattern in colorectal neoplasia: endoscopic magnifying view. Endoscopy. 2001 Apr;33(4):367-73. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-826104. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kudo S, Tamura S, Nakajima T, Yamano H, Kusaka H, Watanabe H. Diagnosis of colorectal tumorous lesions by magnifying endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996 Jul;44(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70222-5.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Davies J, Burke D, Olliver JR, Hardie LJ, Wild CP, Routledge MN. Methylene blue but not indigo carmine causes DNA damage to colonocytes in vitro and in vivo at concentrations used in clinical chromoendoscopy. Gut. 2007 Jan;56(1):155-6. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.107300. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
De Palma GD, Rega M, Masone S, Persico M, Siciliano S, Addeo P, Persico G. Conventional colonoscopy and magnified chromoendoscopy for the endoscopic histological prediction of diminutive colorectal polyps: a single operator study. World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Apr 21;12(15):2402-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i15.2402.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Eisen GM, Kim CY, Fleischer DE, Kozarek RA, Carr-Locke DL, Li TC, Gostout CJ, Heller SJ, Montgomery EA, Al-Kawas FH, Lewis JH, Benjamin SB. High-resolution chromoendoscopy for classifying colonic polyps: a multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 May;55(6):687-94. doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.123619.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Fu KI, Sano Y, Kato S, Fujii T, Nagashima F, Yoshino T, Okuno T, Yoshida S, Fujimori T. Chromoendoscopy using indigo carmine dye spraying with magnifying observation is the most reliable method for differential diagnosis between non-neoplastic and neoplastic colorectal lesions: a prospective study. Endoscopy. 2004 Dec;36(12):1089-93. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-826039.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Konishi K, Kaneko K, Kurahashi T, Yamamoto T, Kushima M, Kanda A, Tajiri H, Mitamura K. A comparison of magnifying and nonmagnifying colonoscopy for diagnosis of colorectal polyps: A prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Jan;57(1):48-53. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.31.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Tung SY, Wu CS, Su MY. Magnifying colonoscopy in differentiating neoplastic from nonneoplastic colorectal lesions. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Sep;96(9):2628-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.04120.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kato S, Fujii T, Koba I, Sano Y, Fu KI, Parra-Blanco A, Tajiri H, Yoshida S, Rembacken B. Assessment of colorectal lesions using magnifying colonoscopy and mucosal dye spraying: can significant lesions be distinguished? Endoscopy. 2001 Apr;33(4):306-10. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-13700.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Sonwalkar S, Rotimi O, Rembacken BJ. Characterization of colonic polyps at conventional (nonmagnifying) colonoscopy after spraying with 0.2 % indigo carmine dye. Endoscopy. 2006 Dec;38(12):1218-23. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-944787.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Pohl J, Lotterer E, Balzer C, Sackmann M, Schmidt KD, Gossner L, Schaab C, Frieling T, Medve M, Mayer G, Nguyen-Tat M, Ell C. Computed virtual chromoendoscopy versus standard colonoscopy with targeted indigocarmine chromoscopy: a randomised multicentre trial. Gut. 2009 Jan;58(1):73-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.153601. Epub 2008 Oct 6.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Su MY, Hsu CM, Ho YP, Chen PC, Lin CJ, Chiu CT. Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and narrow-band imaging systems in differential diagnosis of neoplastic and nonneoplastic colonic polyps. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Dec;101(12):2711-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00932.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Apel D, Jakobs R, Schilling D, Weickert U, Teichmann J, Bohrer MH, Riemann JF. Accuracy of high-resolution chromoendoscopy in prediction of histologic findings in diminutive lesions of the rectosigmoid. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 May;63(6):824-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.09.013.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
East JE, Suzuki N, Bassett P, Stavrinidis M, Thomas HJ, Guenther T, Tekkis PP, Saunders BP. Narrow band imaging with magnification for the characterization of small and diminutive colonic polyps: pit pattern and vascular pattern intensity. Endoscopy. 2008 Oct;40(10):811-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1077586. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Henry ZH, Yeaton P, Shami VM, Kahaleh M, Patrie JT, Cox DG, Peura DA, Emura F, Wang AY. Meshed capillary vessels found on narrow-band imaging without optical magnification effectively identifies colorectal neoplasia: a North American validation of the Japanese experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jul;72(1):118-26. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.048. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rex DK. Narrow-band imaging without optical magnification for histologic analysis of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology. 2009 Apr;136(4):1174-81. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.009. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rastogi A, Keighley J, Singh V, Callahan P, Bansal A, Wani S, Sharma P. High accuracy of narrow band imaging without magnification for the real-time characterization of polyp histology and its comparison with high-definition white light colonoscopy: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Oct;104(10):2422-30. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.403. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rastogi A, Bansal A, Wani S, Callahan P, McGregor DH, Cherian R, Sharma P. Narrow-band imaging colonoscopy--a pilot feasibility study for the detection of polyps and correlation of surface patterns with polyp histologic diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Feb;67(2):280-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.07.036. Epub 2007 Dec 26.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rogart JN, Jain D, Siddiqui UD, Oren T, Lim J, Jamidar P, Aslanian H. Narrow-band imaging without high magnification to differentiate polyps during real-time colonoscopy: improvement with experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Dec;68(6):1136-45. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.04.035. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ignjatovic A, East JE, Suzuki N, Vance M, Guenther T, Saunders BP. Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps at routine colonoscopy (Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard; DISCARD trial): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Dec;10(12):1171-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70329-8. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hoffman A, Kagel C, Goetz M, Tresch A, Mudter J, Biesterfeld S, Galle PR, Neurath MF, Kiesslich R. Recognition and characterization of small colonic neoplasia with high-definition colonoscopy using i-Scan is as precise as chromoendoscopy. Dig Liver Dis. 2010 Jan;42(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2009.04.005. Epub 2009 May 26.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Teixeira CR, Torresini RS, Canali C, Figueiredo LF, Mucenic M, Pereira Lima JC, Carballo MT, Saul C, Toneloto EB. Endoscopic classification of the capillary-vessel pattern of colorectal lesions by spectral estimation technology and magnifying zoom imaging. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):750-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.062.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Togashi K, Osawa H, Koinuma K, Hayashi Y, Miyata T, Sunada K, Nokubi M, Horie H, Yamamoto H. A comparison of conventional endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and the optimal-band imaging system for the differentiation of neoplastic and non-neoplastic colonic polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):734-41. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.10.063.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cairns S, Scholefield JH. Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening in high risk groups. Gut. 2002 Oct;51 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):V1-2. doi: 10.1136/gut.51.suppl_5.v1.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, Smith RA, Brooks D, Andrews KS, Dash C, Giardiello FM, Glick S, Levin TR, Pickhardt P, Rex DK, Thorson A, Winawer SJ; American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory Group; US Multi-Society Task Force; American College of Radiology Colon Cancer Committee. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008 May-Jun;58(3):130-60. doi: 10.3322/CA.2007.0018. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rex DK, Kahi C, O'Brien M, Levin TR, Pohl H, Rastogi A, Burgart L, Imperiale T, Ladabaum U, Cohen J, Lieberman DA. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Mar;73(3):419-22. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.023.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Basford PJ, Longcroft-Wheaton G, Higgins B, Bhandari P. High-definition endoscopy with i-Scan for evaluation of small colon polyps: the HiSCOPE study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Jan;79(1):111-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.06.013. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PHT/2009/046
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
The Value of Polyp Surface Pattern Recognition in the Identification of Neoplasia: a Prospective Study
NCT01182623
COMPLETED
Endoscopic Assessment of Polyp Histology
NCT01297712
TERMINATED
NA
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Diminutive and Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02717598
COMPLETED
NA
Role of Computer-Aided Detection Colonoscopy in Polyp Detection Rate
NCT07171333
COMPLETED
NA
Complete Removal of Neoplastic Large Colorectal Polyps: a Prospective Randomized Comparison of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection or Conventional Polypectomy
NCT01950117
COMPLETED
NA
Inspection of the Colon Using a Retrograde Viewing Device for Detection of Colorectal Polyps
NCT04107376
UNKNOWN
NA
Comparative Study of Postprocessing Imaging Systems for Diminutive Colonic Polyps
NCT01133041
COMPLETED
PHASE4
Optical Polyp Testing for In Vivo Classification
NCT03139942
COMPLETED
NA
Linked Color Imaging Versus White Light Endoscopy for the Evaluation of Scars of Non-pedunculated Polyps. LCI Scar Study.
NCT04899700
COMPLETED
NA
Study on Complications, EfficAcy and Costs of Large Polypectomy
NCT02694120
UNKNOWN
Efficacy and Safety of a New Polypectomy Snare for Cold-polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02245854
COMPLETED
NA
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Resection of Small Pedunculated Polyps
NCT06097650
COMPLETED
NA
Real-Time Characterizations of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow Band Imaging
NCT02441998
COMPLETED
Accuracy of the Optical Diagnosis of Small Colonic Polyps Using the Nice Classification
NCT02009774
COMPLETED
Computer Assisted Optical Assessment of Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02522702
UNKNOWN
Recurrence After Gastric and Intestinal Polyp Resection
NCT07314554
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Full Spectrum vs. Standard Forward-viewing Colonoscopy
NCT02117674
COMPLETED
NA
The Impact of Repeated Colonoscopic Insert Method on the Detection Rate of Adenomas in the Sigmoid Colon
NCT06186778
COMPLETED
NA
I-Scan For Colon Polyp Detection In HNPCC
NCT01823471
COMPLETED
NA
Endocuff Adenoma Detection Rate Pilot Study
NCT01761097
UNKNOWN
NA
Resect and Discard Approach to Diminutive Colonic Polyps
NCT01877525
COMPLETED
Combined Forward and Retroflexion Withdrawal in the Detection of Polyps and Adenoma During Colonoscopy
NCT03901651
COMPLETED
NA
Linked-Color Imaging Versus Indigo Carmine Pump Spraying on the Colorectal Adenoma Detection Rate
NCT06961149
RECRUITING
NA
Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Metal Clips With Hot Snare Polypectomy for Resection of Big Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT06097637
RECRUITING
NA
Comparative Effectiveness of Hot Versus Cold Snare Polypectomy of Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02484079
COMPLETED
NA