A Study to Test a New Pelvic Examination Assessment Tool

NCT ID: NCT01725581

Last Updated: 2014-04-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-06-30

Study Completion Date

2013-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to show that a new assessment tool for pelvic examination is valid and reliable.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Physical examination of the pelvis is an important core skill that medical students need to acquire. However, due to its intimate nature some students are graduating unable to perform competent pelvic examinations. At present, evaluation of the medical students competence at pelvic examination is done by subjective faculty assessment. This assessment is typically performed at the end of the teaching block and is based on the assessors' recollection of the students' performance. This kind of assessment has been shown to have poor validity and reliability. This is in contrast to objective structured assessments of technical skill (OSATS), which use task specific and global rating scales and have been used to evaluate a wide range of clinical and surgical skills. However, no studies to date have evaluated an assessment tool for pelvic examination. In this study the investigators aim to determine the validity and reliability of an OSATS for pelvic examination. In addition, the investigators aim to identify factors that influence the scores in OSATS.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Female Pelvic Examination

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Inexperienced students

Final year medical students at the end of the Obstetrics and Gynaecology placement

Observed Structured Assessment Tool in Pelvic Examination

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Participants will be asked to perform a pelvic examination including a speculum and bimanual examination on a pelvic model. They will be asked to approach the pelvic model as if it were a real patient.

Experienced students

Final year medical students at the end of the Obstetrics and Gynaecology placement

Observed Structured Assessment Tool in Pelvic Examination

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Participants will be asked to perform a pelvic examination including a speculum and bimanual examination on a pelvic model. They will be asked to approach the pelvic model as if it were a real patient.

Junior Doctors

Pre Royal College of Obstetric and Gynaecology registered junior doctors with experience in Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Observed Structured Assessment Tool in Pelvic Examination

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Participants will be asked to perform a pelvic examination including a speculum and bimanual examination on a pelvic model. They will be asked to approach the pelvic model as if it were a real patient.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Observed Structured Assessment Tool in Pelvic Examination

Participants will be asked to perform a pelvic examination including a speculum and bimanual examination on a pelvic model. They will be asked to approach the pelvic model as if it were a real patient.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Final year medical students starting their Obstetrics and Gynaecology placement
* Final year medical students finishing their Obstetrics and Gynaecology placement
* Pre Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology registered junior doctors doing a Obstetrics and Gynaecology placement.
* Signed Consent Form

Exclusion Criteria

• None
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Thomas Justin Clark

Consultant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Thomas J Clark, MBChB MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham Womens Hospital

Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PEAT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.