Can We Improve the Comfort of Pelvic Exams?

NCT ID: NCT02913027

Last Updated: 2017-04-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-09-05

Study Completion Date

2017-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to investigate patients self-reported comfort levels during each section of the pelvic exam.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to investigate the sequence in which physicians perform the pelvic exam, describe and compare the self-reported comfort during each section of the pelvic exam and how comfort during the exam relates to quality of life, self-esteem, and sexual function in English speaking females at least 18 years of age in an outpatient setting.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Observational

ARM: Normal Pelvic Exam Exposures: External Exam followed by speculum exam, followed by bimanual exam

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Experimental Pelvic Exam

Arm: Changing the order of Pelvic Exam Intervention: External exam, Bimanual Exam, Speculum Exam

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

External Exam

Intervention Type OTHER

The pelvic exam will be completed in the following order: external, speculum, bimanual exam in the "Standard" group. In the Experimental group the pelvic exam will be done with external exam, bimanual exam, then speculum exam.

Bimanual Exam

Intervention Type OTHER

Speculum Exam

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

External Exam

The pelvic exam will be completed in the following order: external, speculum, bimanual exam in the "Standard" group. In the Experimental group the pelvic exam will be done with external exam, bimanual exam, then speculum exam.

Intervention Type OTHER

Bimanual Exam

Intervention Type OTHER

Speculum Exam

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* English-speaking, female patients
* Are able to can read and write English
* Are utilizing outpatient services at an OBGYN outpatient office
* Are scheduled for a well-woman exam

Exclusion Criteria

* Non-English speaking patients
* Patients who cannot read or write
* Those who are pregnant
* Have an active vaginal infection
* Patients who, otherwise, do not require a speculum exam during their appointment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Philadelphia Urosurgical Associates

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kristene Whitmore

Physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kristene Whitmore, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Philadelphia Urosurgical Associates

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Williams AA, Williams M. A guide to performing pelvic speculum exams: a patient-centered approach to reducing iatrogenic effects. Teach Learn Med. 2013;25(4):383-91. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2013.827969.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24112210 (View on PubMed)

Committee on Gynecologic Practice. Committee opinion No. 534: well-woman visit. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Aug;120(2 Pt 1):421-4. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182680517.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22825111 (View on PubMed)

Daley AM, Cromwell PF. How to perform a pelvic exam for the sexually active adolescent. Nurse Pract. 2002 Sep;27(9):28, 31-2, 34, 37-9, 43; quiz 44-5. doi: 10.1097/00006205-200209000-00006.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12352766 (View on PubMed)

Primrose RB. Taking the tension out of pelvic exams. Am J Nurs. 1984 Jan;84(1):72-4. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 6559035 (View on PubMed)

Bates CK, Carroll N, Potter J. The challenging pelvic examination. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jun;26(6):651-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1610-8. Epub 2011 Jan 12.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21225474 (View on PubMed)

Hilden M, Sidenius K, Langhoff-Roos J, Wijma B, Schei B. Women's experiences of the gynecologic examination: factors associated with discomfort. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003 Nov;82(11):1030-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00253.x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 14616277 (View on PubMed)

Wijma B, Gullberg M, Kjessler B. Attitudes towards pelvic examination in a random sample of Swedish women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998 Apr;77(4):422-8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 9598951 (View on PubMed)

Bernet R, Buddeberg C. [Physician-patient relations in gynecology: expectations and experiences of patients]. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch. 1994;34(1):43-9. doi: 10.1159/000272333. German.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 8019173 (View on PubMed)

Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacci R. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Apr;27(4):485-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70238-x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 8604867 (View on PubMed)

Gallagher EJ, Liebman M, Bijur PE. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Dec;38(6):633-8. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.118863.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11719741 (View on PubMed)

Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R. The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther. 2005 Jan-Feb;31(1):1-20. doi: 10.1080/00926230590475206.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15841702 (View on PubMed)

Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D'Agostino R Jr. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000 Apr-Jun;26(2):191-208. doi: 10.1080/009262300278597.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 10782451 (View on PubMed)

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Reference Type RESULT

Rinko R, Yu I, Bakillah E, Alper L, Delaney C, Su M, Dawson M, Gracely EJ, Whitmore KE. Sequence of Pelvic Examination Affects Patient-Reported Pain. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018 Mar/Apr;24(2):150-154. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000515.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29474289 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pelvic Exams

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.