Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Mitigating Chronic Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Following Childbirth by Pelvic Floor Dynamometry
NCT02391285
Relationship Among Vaginal Palpation, Vaginal Squeeze Pressure and Dynamometry of Nulliparous Pelvic Floor Muscles
NCT02831452
Digital Perineal Massage and Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercise During Pregnancy for Prevention of Perineal Laceration
NCT03108170
Pelvic Floor Muscle Function in Nulliparous and Primiparous.
NCT01315769
Comparison of Teaching Methods of Pelvic Floor Muscle Contraction in Women
NCT06306703
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The ability to contract the pelvic floor may be assessed during pelvic exam with a Brink's score. However, there are still elements of subjectivity in components of this score and researchers continue to look for an objective measure of pelvic floor muscle tone. The Peritron perineometer device has been shown to correlate well with pelvic floor contraction, based on Brinks scores.Measurements taken with the Peritron device have better inter-rater reliability than other measures of pelvic floor contraction, which makes it an attractive tool for clinical research. However, its use in clinical research is hampered by the lack of normative data with perineometer measurements. Though there are some studies that use the perineometer to assess resting (i.e. non-contracted) pelvic tone after therapies for pelvic pain, there are no studies that assess the typical perineometer measurements in women with levator spasm, and there are no data to guide how these measurements may compare with women having a normal pelvic floor examination. We hypothesize that: 1) Women with high resting pelvic tone perceived on exam will have high perineometer measurements and women with normal pelvic tone on exam will have low perineometer measurements, regardless of whether or not they report pelvic pain. 2) Women with high resting perineometer measurements will have minimal change in perineometer scores between resting and maximum pelvic floor contraction (squeeze). 3) In women with clinical evidence of levator spasm, resting perineometer measurements will correlate with severity of pelvic pain symptoms. We plan to investigate these hypotheses by executing the following specific aims:
Specific Aim 1: To compare clinical assessment of resting pelvic tone with perineometer measurements in a range of women, including those with and without pelvic pain.
Specific Aim 2: To compare the change in perineometer measurements between rest and maximum pelvic floor contraction in women with and without pelvic pain.
Specific Aim 3: To determine whether resting pelvic floor perineometer measurements correlate with the severity of pain symptoms, as measured by short form McGill questionnaire scores and visual analog scale (VAS), in a subset of women with pelvic pain and clinical evidence of levator spasm.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Women with Chronic Pelvic Pain
Use of perineometer to measure pelvic resting tone and contraction in women with chronic pelvic pain and determine if resting tone correlates with severity of pain.
No interventions assigned to this group
Women without Chronic Pelvic Pain
Use of perineometer to measure pelvic resting tone and contraction in women without chronic pelvic pain
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* history of GYN or GU malignancy
* chronic use of muscle relaxants
* exam findings that would preclude the ability of the woman to retain the Peritron device (e.g. narrowed introitus or stage III/IV prolapse).
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Duke University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nazema Siddiqui, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke University
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00053004
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.