Comparison of Teaching Methods of Pelvic Floor Muscle Contraction in Women
NCT ID: NCT06306703
Last Updated: 2024-03-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
54 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-03-15
2024-08-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Training Models in Pelvic Floor Muscle Training
NCT07099170
Pelvic Floor Muscle Training on the Quality of Life in Women With Urinary Incontinence
NCT03514147
The Pelvic Floor Muscles Strength and Sexual Function in Primigravid and Non-pregnant Nulliparous
NCT02866292
Pelvic Floor Muscle Function in Nulliparous and Primiparous.
NCT01315769
Effects of Visceral Manipulation in Women With Urinary Incontinence
NCT03945578
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
When the Levator Ani muscle was examined histochemically under an electron microscope, it was shown that it consisted of Type 1 (slow twitch-67%) and Type 2 (fast twitch-33%) striated muscle fibers. Type 1 fibers are resistant to fatigue and can produce contractions for long periods of time. Type 2 fibers have high contraction strength but have low resistance to fatigue. While Type 2 fibers cause sudden contraction in situations that increase intra-abdominal pressure, such as coughing, sneezing, heavy lifting, Type 1 fibers maintain the tone required for continence without fatigue for a long time \[1, 2\].
The pelvic floor has important functions in ensuring the continence mechanism, providing structural support to the pelvic openings such as the urethra, vagina and anus, supporting the pelvic organs, and performing vital activities such as sexual function and birth \[3, 4\].
Damage or weakening of the pelvic floor due to reasons such as pregnancy, birth, newborn weight, menopause, age, obesity, smoking, hysterectomy, constipation, systemic diseases, genetics, bad urination habits, constipation, heavy sports, or tension in the structures that form it. In this case, it may cause problems such as urinary incontinence, anorectal dysfunction, pelvic organ prolapse, pelvic pain or sexual dysfunction, and these pathologies are generally defined as pelvic floor dysfunction\[4\]. Although pelvic floor problems are not life-threatening, they affect people's psychological, social and physical well-being and negatively affect their quality of life by causing limitations in their work, family, social and sexual lives \[5\].
The pelvic floor can be evaluated by many different methods. The aim is to objectively evaluate the anatomy of the pelvic floor and pelvic organs and relate symptoms to anatomical findings. The methods used in the evaluation of the pelvic floor muscles are generally observation, palpation, electromyography (EMG), EMG with biofeedback, perineometer, pelvic floor dynamometer, ultrasonographic imaging (USG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)\[6\]. Evaluations can be performed in the lithotomy position or standing.
There are two components to proper pelvic floor muscle contraction: compression of the pelvic openings and pulling inward in the cranial direction. Some explanations for why there is difficulty in voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction: The fact that the pelvic floor muscles are in a place that cannot be seen in the pelvis, many people do not have knowledge about pelvic floor muscle contraction and are not aware of the automatic contractions of these muscles, from a neurophysiological point of view, voluntary contraction is difficult because the muscles are small, the pelvic and perineal areas are more prone to straining and defecation. and since they are related to excretion, the primary awareness is in this direction \[7\].
Some incorrect behaviors may occur while performing pelvic floor muscle contraction. These are reported as contraction of the abdominal muscles, hip adductor muscles or gluteal muscles instead of the pelvic floor muscles, holding the breath, excessive breathing and straining \[7\].
Studies in the literature report that more than 30% of women specifically have problems with pelvic floor muscle contraction \[8\]. There are studies reporting that approximately 25% of women perform the Valsalva maneuver instead when pelvic floor muscle contraction is requested \[3\]. In a study conducted in Austria, it was reported that during routine gynecological evaluation, 44.9% of women could not make correct pelvic floor muscle contraction and only 26.5% could perform muscle contraction without increasing intra-abdominal pressure \[9\]. There are studies reporting that when women contract their pelvic floor muscles, they also include other muscles in the contraction, and some of them strain their pelvic floor muscles rather than pulling them inwards \[7\]. In our study, investigators planned to evaluate the pelvic floor muscle contractions of women who had not received pelvic floor muscle training before and after different teaching methods and the compensations they used during this process.
Kegel reported that the majority of women did not have awareness of muscle function, so he performed the exercises with a perineometer, which makes muscle contraction visible with the help of an indicator. PTFE can be applied alone or using various devices such as biofeedback \[8\]. In our study, it was planned to teach one group only by verbal explanation, another group by digital vaginal palpation, and the third group by teaching pelvic floor muscle contraction with a perineometer.
In their study, Dietz et al. evaluated levator activity with transabdominal USG and aimed to teach patients levator muscle contraction directly on the screen by creating visual biofeedback with ultrasonography, with a maximum of 5 minutes of training. As a result, they emphasized that transabdominal USG provides good biofeedback to women who are not suitable for compensations and vaginal training. Thus, they advised women who came to the clinic for examination that pelvic floor muscle contraction could be taught in a very short time with USG \[10\]. In this study, based on this study, investigators will evaluate hiatal aperture and pelvic floor elevation with USG before and after different teaching methods.
Rodas et al. emphasize that pelvic floor muscle training should be specific to each patient and that the pelvic floor therapist should know which equipment or therapeutic aids are more effective to use for evaluation \[2\]. As a result of this study, investigators will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of pelvic floor muscle contraction teaching methods and provide clinicians with evidence-based information in this field.
In the literature, physiotherapy and rehabilitation approaches used to teach pelvic floor muscle contraction are verbal instructions, biofeedback, perineometer, vaginal cone, Foley catheter, tampon, three-dimensional real time ultrasound and virtual reality training. Verbal instructions used during training are necessary to elicit rapid and strong contraction of the pelvic floor muscles. One of the most frequently used verbal instructions in training is "Pinch and Pull" instruction. Another method for patients to understand correct pelvic floor muscle contraction is to use visual imagery techniques when describing the contraction. Visualizations such as closing the tap or door for squeezing, or the elevator going up for pulling in or holding can be used \[7\]. To describe correct muscle contraction, the movement can be likened to eating spaghetti, drinking water through a straw, the movement of a jellyfish, or the vacuum movement created in a vacuum cleaner. The investigator will use these metaphors in the training.
To the investigators knowledge, no study has been found in the literature comparing the techniques in which participants are taught pelvic floor muscle contraction with different methods before and after the training. The investigators think that will make new contributions to the literature in this field with their study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
group1, verbal instruction
group1, group2, group 3
to teaching with verbal instruction to teaching with digital vaginal palpation to teaching with perineometer
group 2, digital vaginal palpation
group1, group2, group 3
to teaching with verbal instruction to teaching with digital vaginal palpation to teaching with perineometer
group 3, perineometer
group1, group2, group 3
to teaching with verbal instruction to teaching with digital vaginal palpation to teaching with perineometer
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
group1, group2, group 3
to teaching with verbal instruction to teaching with digital vaginal palpation to teaching with perineometer
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
20 Years
50 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Duygu Sultan Oge
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Duygu Sultan Oge
student
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Türkan Akbayrak, Prof
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Hacettepe Universty
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PhD Thesis of Duygu Sultan Oge
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.