Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-01-07
2022-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pelvic Floor Muscle Evaluation in Women With Stress Urinary and Urgency Urinary Incontinence
NCT01391780
Pelvic Floor Muscle Training on the Quality of Life in Women With Urinary Incontinence
NCT03514147
Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Muscles Training in Group for Women With Urinary Incontinence
NCT03500185
Pelvic Floor Muscle Contraction in Response to Different Verbal Instructions in Women With Urinary Incontinence
NCT03940794
Ultrasound and Electromyography Biofeedback for Pelvic Floor Muscle Training
NCT07243028
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective: The main objective of this study will be to carry out a validation study of ultrasound measurements in women with predominant SUI (urethral mobility, movement of the ano-rectal angle, elastography): Inter/intra-observer reproducibility; variability versus measurement by correlation with clinical examination (modified Oxford scale); sensitivity to change before/after PFMT Secondary objectives will be to show a correlation between the different ultrasound measurements and the clinical symptoms assessed by validated questionnaires : International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF) and Contilife. A quantitative pulseal elastography analysis by Ultra-fast shear wave elastography (Supersonic Imagine) will also be performed before and after PFMT, looking for changes after PFMT. We Patient satisfaction after PFMT will also be assessed using the validated "Patient Global Impression of Improvement" questionnaire (PGI-I) Materials and Methods: This is a single-center prospective study involving patients in PFMT for predominant SUI. Patients will have a 10-week PFMT protocol. An evaluation will be conducted at the beginning and end of the program. This will include an assessment of symptoms using validated questionnaires (ICIQ-SF, CONTILIFE), a clinical examination (modified Oxford scale), as well as transperineal ultrasound measurements of urethral mobility (Bladder Neck Desent, BND measured in centimeters), movement of ano-rectal angle and quantitative elastography measurements (Ultra-fast shear wave, elasticity E expressed in kiloP).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Women with predominant SUI
All women with predominant SUI will be referred to a physiotherapist for PFMT as usually. They will have an ultrasound evaluation before and after the session
perineal ultrasound
all women will have ultrasound measurements of the bladder neck descent, of the movement of the ano-rectal angle during a Valsalva maneuver and elastographic measurement before and after PFMT. All measurement will be conducted by perineal route, with is a non invasive ultrasound route
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
perineal ultrasound
all women will have ultrasound measurements of the bladder neck descent, of the movement of the ano-rectal angle during a Valsalva maneuver and elastographic measurement before and after PFMT. All measurement will be conducted by perineal route, with is a non invasive ultrasound route
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* referred for predominant SUI
* agreeing to participate in the study
* beneficiary of a social security scheme or entitled
* having been informed about the study (non-opposition)
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who do not understand French
* Pregnant women
* Women with stage 2 or more prolapse according to the POP-Q classification
* Women with a history of:
* pelvis / spine trauma
* perineal pain
* urinary or vaginal infection
* perineal surgery for urinary incontinence and/or prolapse
* spinal surgery
* pacemaker
* respiratory pathology
* neurological disorders
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Caen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Clemence Tomadesso, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University Hospital of Caen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Pizzoferato
Caen, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A; Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(2):167-78. doi: 10.1002/nau.10052. No abstract available.
Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN; International Urogynecological Association; International Continence Society. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4-20. doi: 10.1002/nau.20798.
DeLancey JO. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Jun;170(6):1713-20; discussion 1720-3. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70346-9.
Petros PE, Ulmsten UI. An integral theory and its method for the diagnosis and management of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1993;153:1-93. No abstract available.
Fritel X, Fauconnier A, Bader G, Cosson M, Debodinance P, Deffieux X, Denys P, Dompeyre P, Faltin D, Fatton B, Haab F, Hermieux JF, Kerdraon J, Mares P, Mellier G, Michel-Laaengh N, Nadeau C, Robain G, de Tayrac R, Jacquetin B; French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. Diagnosis and management of adult female stress urinary incontinence: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Jul;151(1):14-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.041. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
Hermieu JF, Denys P, Fritel X. [Critical review of guidelines for female urinary incontinence diagnosis and treatment]. Prog Urol. 2012 Oct;22(11):636-43. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Sep 10. French.
Messelink B, Benson T, Berghmans B, Bo K, Corcos J, Fowler C, Laycock J, Lim PH, van Lunsen R, a Nijeholt GL, Pemberton J, Wang A, Watier A, Van Kerrebroeck P. Standardization of terminology of pelvic floor muscle function and dysfunction: report from the pelvic floor clinical assessment group of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24(4):374-80. doi: 10.1002/nau.20144. No abstract available.
Deffieux X, Billecocq S, Demoulin G, Rivain AL, Trichot C, Thubert T. [Pelvic floor rehabilitation for female urinary incontinence: mechanisms of action]. Prog Urol. 2013 Jun;23(8):491-501. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 May 2. French.
Miller JM, Sampselle C, Ashton-Miller J, Hong GR, DeLancey JO. Clarification and confirmation of the Knack maneuver: the effect of volitional pelvic floor muscle contraction to preempt expected stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Jun;19(6):773-82. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0525-3.
Hung HC, Hsiao SM, Chih SY, Lin HH, Tsauo JY. Effect of pelvic-floor muscle strengthening on bladder neck mobility: a clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2011 Jul;91(7):1030-8. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100186. Epub 2011 May 12.
Schaer GN, Perucchini D, Munz E, Peschers U, Koechli OR, Delancey JO. Sonographic evaluation of the bladder neck in continent and stress-incontinent women. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Mar;93(3):412-6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00420-7.
Balmforth JR, Mantle J, Bidmead J, Cardozo L. A prospective observational trial of pelvic floor muscle training for female stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2006 Oct;98(4):811-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06393.x.
Tosun OC, Solmaz U, Ekin A, Tosun G, Gezer C, Ergenoglu AM, Yeniel AO, Mat E, Malkoc M, Askar N. Assessment of the effect of pelvic floor exercises on pelvic floor muscle strength using ultrasonography in patients with urinary incontinence: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Jan;28(2):360-5. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.360. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
Volloyhaug I, Morkved S, Salvesen O, Salvesen KA. Assessment of pelvic floor muscle contraction with palpation, perineometry and transperineal ultrasound: a cross-sectional study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;47(6):768-73. doi: 10.1002/uog.15731. Epub 2016 May 2.
Dietz HP. Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Part I: two-dimensional aspects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jan;23(1):80-92. doi: 10.1002/uog.939.
Bergman A, McKenzie CJ, Richmond J, Ballard CA, Platt LD. Transrectal ultrasound versus cystography in the evaluation of anatomical stress urinary incontinence. Br J Urol. 1988 Sep;62(3):228-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1988.tb04324.x.
Johnson JD, Lamensdorf H, Hollander IN, Thurman AE. Use of transvaginal endosonography in the evaluation of women with stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 1992 Feb;147(2):421-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37256-7.
Wise BG, Burton G, Cutner A, Cardozo LD. Effect of vaginal ultrasound probe on lower urinary tract function. Br J Urol. 1992 Jul;70(1):12-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1992.tb15655.x.
Alper T, Cetinkaya M, Okutgen S, Kokcu A, Malatyalioglu E. Evaluation of urethrovesical angle by ultrasound in women with and without urinary stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12(5):308-11. doi: 10.1007/s001920170031.
Koelbl H, Bernaschek G. A new method for sonographic urethrocystography and simultaneous pressure-flow measurements. Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Sep;74(3 Pt 1):417-22.
Thompson JA, O'Sullivan PB, Briffa K, Neumann P, Court S. Assessment of pelvic floor movement using transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005 Jul-Aug;16(4):285-92. doi: 10.1007/s00192-005-1308-3. Epub 2005 Mar 22.
Dietz HP, Clarke B, Herbison P. Bladder neck mobility and urethral closure pressure as predictors of genuine stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2002;13(5):289-93. doi: 10.1007/s001920200063.
Dietz HP, Clarke B. The influence of posture on perineal ultrasound imaging parameters. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12(2):104-6. doi: 10.1007/pl00004030.
Yang SH, Huang WC, Yang SY, Yang E, Yang JM. Validation of new ultrasound parameters for quantifying pelvic floor muscle contraction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Apr;33(4):465-71. doi: 10.1002/uog.6338.
Ferraioli G, Tinelli C, Zicchetti M, Above E, Poma G, Di Gregorio M, Filice C. Reproducibility of real-time shear wave elastography in the evaluation of liver elasticity. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Nov;81(11):3102-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.05.030. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Dore CJ, Schafer FK, Svensson WE, Hooley RJ, Ohlinger R, Mendelson EB, Balu-Maestro C, Locatelli M, Tourasse C, Cavanaugh BC, Juhan V, Stavros AT, Tardivon A, Gay J, Henry JP, Cohen-Bacrie C; BE1 Investigators. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology. 2012 Feb;262(2):435-49. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110640.
Cosgrove DO, Berg WA, Dore CJ, Skyba DM, Henry JP, Gay J, Cohen-Bacrie C; BE1 Study Group. Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible. Eur Radiol. 2012 May;22(5):1023-32. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2340-y. Epub 2011 Dec 31.
Aljuraifani R, Stafford RE, Hug F, Hodges PW. Female striated urogenital sphincter contraction measured by shear wave elastography during pelvic floor muscle activation: Proof of concept and validation. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Jan;37(1):206-212. doi: 10.1002/nau.23275. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
Stafford RE, Aljuraifani R, Hug F, Hodges PW. Application of shear-wave elastography to estimate the stiffness of the male striated urethral sphincter during voluntary contractions. BJU Int. 2017 Apr;119(4):619-625. doi: 10.1111/bju.13688. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
Kreutzkamp JM, Schafer SD, Amler S, Strube F, Kiesel L, Schmitz R. Strain Elastography as a New Method for Assessing Pelvic Floor Biomechanics. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017 Apr;43(4):868-872. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.12.004. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
Pizzoferrato AC, Fauconnier A, Bader G. [Value of ultrasonographic measurement of bladder neck mobility in the management of female stress urinary incontinence]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2011 Jan;39(1):42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2010.09.019. Epub 2010 Dec 24. French.
Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L. Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 May;21(5):523-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-1069-5. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23(4):322-30. doi: 10.1002/nau.20041.
Amarenco G, Arnould B, Carita P, Haab F, Labat JJ, Richard F. European psychometric validation of the CONTILIFE: a Quality of Life questionnaire for urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2003 Apr;43(4):391-404. doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00054-x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2019-A01425-52
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.