MRI & MRV in Pelvic Congestion Syndrome in Females

NCT ID: NCT03252041

Last Updated: 2017-08-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

25 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-09-01

Study Completion Date

2018-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To investigate the feasibility of MRI and MRV in diagnosis of pelvic congestion syndrome.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the past, a diagnosis of chronic pelvic pain left many women frustrated with few treatment options and a lack of available resources. Their physicians were likewise perplexed, despite the endless acquisition of negative laboratory and imaging data as well as inconclusive consultations obtained. In the last 10 years, improved scientific understanding and increased physician awareness have lessened the confusion surrounding this condition and its distinct association with pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS). Furthermore, refinements of medical and minimally invasive surgical solutions give affected patients more therapeutic choices today.

Since anatomical venous variations in the pelvis are common, it is important to know the anatomy of these vessels for treatment planning. Imaging is critical in the evaluation of pelvic varices, both to differentiate them from other condition and also because pelvic varices may be secondary to serious underlying pathology, such as inferior vena caval obstruction, portal hypertension, increased pelvic blood flow, and vascular malformations.

The diagnosis of PCS has usually been suggested by duplex ultrasound (US), but ultrasound imaging does not readily show the gonadal veins. Phlebography is the "gold standard" for anatomic diagnostic studies. Related mortality and morbidity are low, but patient discomfort and costs make this an unattractive routine method of diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can usually demonstrate pelvic and ovarian varices, as well as the gonadal veins.

In this prospective study, we will investigate the feasibility of using magnetic resonance venography (MRV) in the diagnosis of PCS and evaluated its accuracy and reliability in comparison to phlebography.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pelvic Pain Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

MRI

Magnetic Resonance imaging modalities and sequences in pelvic congestion syndrome

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients with signs and symptoms of PCS.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with general contraindications to MRI as presence of any para-magnetic substance as pacemakers, or in severely ill patients or those with claustrophobia, arrhythmic patients.
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohamed AbuDeif Sayed

Dr

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hossam Galal, ass prof

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Assiut University, Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mohamed Sayed, (M.B.B.CH)

Role: CONTACT

+201008253457

Noha Attia, lect

Role: CONTACT

+201001238435

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MRI & MRV in PCS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.