Validation of a Female Pelvic Floor Interactive Training Model
NCT ID: NCT04153500
Last Updated: 2021-04-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
62 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-11-25
2021-04-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pelvic Floor Consciousness in Women With Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
NCT04334798
A Study to Test a New Pelvic Examination Assessment Tool
NCT01725581
Effectiveness of Different Hypopressive Exercises in Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
NCT04336150
Effectiveness of Assessment and Educational Intervention on Motor Control of the Pelvic Floor Muscle in Women
NCT03220672
Pelvic Floor Muscle Training on the Quality of Life in Women With Urinary Incontinence
NCT03514147
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* To evaluate the residents' knowledge of the female pelvis anatomy at 3 months post intervention.
* To determine residents' satisfaction with Pelvic+ methodology compared to traditional methodology.
Material and Method:
Design: A multicentre, two arms, parallel randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an educational intervention to compare knowledge on female pelvis anatomy between Pelvic+ methodology and traditional methodology at baseline, at completion of intervention and at 3 months post-intervention.
Setting:
Teaching Unit of Midwifery of Catalonia. Institut d'Estudis Sanitaris, Barcelona, Spain.
Participants: Midwives in their 1st year of training.
Sample size: Accepting an alpha risk of 0.05 and a beta risk of 0.2 in a two-sided test, 68 subjects are necessary in first group and 68 in the second to recognize as statistically significant a difference greater than or equal to 1.66 units. The common standard deviation is assumed to be 2.17 and the correlation coefficient between the initial and final measurement as 0.0001. It has been anticipated a drop-out rate of 20%.
Randomisation:
Prior to randomisation, consenting Teaching Unit will provide a list of their current residents' caseload. The number of participants on that caseload who meet the inclusion criteria, will be entered into the random numbers generator to create a randomly list in which to approach potential participants to intervention group or control group. Following the random list, sealed envelopes will be prepared. When the participant approach, second researcher will then seek informed consent to participate in the RCT consecutively. Once the participant has signed the informed consent to participate in the RCT, the first sealed envelope will be given to her/him sequentially.
The information contained in the sealed envelope will allocate the participant to room A or B. Being A: control group; and B: intervention group.
In situations where a participant, who had previously signed the informed consent and, before running the intervention session, decides to withdraw the study, will be removed from the RCT.
Blinding:
Principal investigator and the statistician will remain blind to group allocation. Outcome assessments will only be conducted by principal investigator blind to the intervention and control groups.
Second researcher and professor will remain blind to questions included in both questionnaires: anatomy and satisfaction.
Intervention: Pelvic+ methodology The interventional session (40 minutes total) will consist of two parts: The 1st one is a lecture of 10 minutes (25% out of the total time) on female pelvic floor anatomy. In the 2nd part, during 30 min (75%), participants, in small groups of 4 people, will assemble the female pelvic floor interactive model, following the indications suggested by the second researcher. Pelvic+ is supported by an assembling manual that participants will be allowed to use.
Control group: Traditional methodology A professor/lecturer of anatomy will carry out the session in the control group.
The traditional session will consist of 30 minutes of lecture (75% out of the total time), where female pelvic floor will be presented throughout theory and images. In the 2nd part, during 10 min (25%), participants will review anatomical drawings /atlases.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
BASIC_SCIENCE
DOUBLE
Second researcher and professor will remain blind to questions included in both questionnaires: anatomy and satisfaction.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Traditional Methodology
A professor/lecturer of anatomy will carry out the session in the control group. The traditional (40 minutes total) will consist of 30 minutes of lecture (75% out of the total time), where female pelvic floor will be presented throughout theory and images. In the 2nd part, during 10 min (25%), participants will review anatomical drawings /atlases.
No interventions assigned to this group
Pelvic+ method
The second researcher will carry out the session in the intervention group. The interventional session (40 minutes total) will consist of two parts: The 1st one is a lecture of 10 minutes (25% out of the total time) on female pelvic floor anatomy. In the 2nd part, during 30 min (75%), participants, in small groups of 4 people, will assemble the female pelvic floor interactive model, following the indications suggested by the second researcher. Pelvic+ is supported by an assembling manual that participants will be allowed to use.
Anatomy class with Pelvic+ methodology
Teaching of female pelvis anatomy using a interactive training model (Pelvic+ methodology)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Anatomy class with Pelvic+ methodology
Teaching of female pelvis anatomy using a interactive training model (Pelvic+ methodology)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
2. residents who have previously undertake another residence
3. residents who have done their Final Work Grade on pelvic floor,
4. residents who have done pelvic dissection during their grade studies
5. traditional methodology using anatomical models.
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ana Pereda
Gynecologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ana Pereda, Dr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
IES
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institut Estudis Salut
Barcelona, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CEEAH 4764
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.