Comparative Effectiveness of Early Physical Therapy Versus Usual Care for Low Back Pain

NCT ID: NCT01556581

Last Updated: 2020-07-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

119 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-02-29

Study Completion Date

2017-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two management strategies for patients with a recent onset of low back pain (LBP). One is based on usual care and the other is based on early access to physical therapy following a pragmatic treatment-based classification approach. The secondary purposes are to compare the subsequent healthcare utilization associated with two management strategies as well as to evaluate the importance of psychosocial factors on outcomes within both groups of treatment. The overall hypothesis guiding the study is that the additional initial treatment expense incurred by early implementation will result in superior short-term clinical effectiveness, and will be more cost-effective in the long-term due to reduced healthcare utilization. We will also explore the importance of psychosocial factors on outcomes within both treatment groups, which may provide insights for further improving treatment strategies.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The specific aims of this study are the following:

1. Compare the effectiveness of two primary care management strategies for patients with a recent onset of combat-related LBP. We hypothesize early physical therapy access for these Soldiers will result in greater improvements in function and quality of life over 1 year as compared to a stepped care strategy.
2. Compare the subsequent healthcare utilization associated with two management strategies for patients with a recent onset combat-related LBP. We hypothesize early physical therapy access will result in decreased healthcare utilization over 1 year as compared to a stepped care strategy.
3. Evaluate the importance of psychosocial factors on outcomes within both groups of treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Usual Care (UC)

The usual care (UC) group will be managed with stepped care approach, receiving a screening exam, advice, education, activity limitation profile and medications if needed, but no early physical therapy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Usual Care (UC)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Initial management for all patients will include an activity-limiting profile for up to 30 days and a 10-day supply of medications if needed (NSAIDs and muscle relaxers). All patients will then receive advice and education about the favorable natural history of LBP and the advantages of remaining as active as possible. All patients will be recommended to follow-up with their primary care provider using normal procedures if they are not satisfied with their progress.

Early Physical Therapy (PT)

All subjects in this group will get usual care approach in addition to immediately receiving eight sessions of physical therapy based on a pragmatic treatment based classification system for treating low back pain.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Early Physical Therapy (PT)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients in the early PT group will receive the same treatment as the usual care group, but will then be referred to physical therapy within 3 days. The physical therapy treatment will be based on the Treatment Based Classification system (an approach that places patients into either an extension-oriented, core strength/stabilization, or a spinal manipulation treatment group based on signs and symptoms).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Usual Care (UC)

Initial management for all patients will include an activity-limiting profile for up to 30 days and a 10-day supply of medications if needed (NSAIDs and muscle relaxers). All patients will then receive advice and education about the favorable natural history of LBP and the advantages of remaining as active as possible. All patients will be recommended to follow-up with their primary care provider using normal procedures if they are not satisfied with their progress.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Early Physical Therapy (PT)

Patients in the early PT group will receive the same treatment as the usual care group, but will then be referred to physical therapy within 3 days. The physical therapy treatment will be based on the Treatment Based Classification system (an approach that places patients into either an extension-oriented, core strength/stabilization, or a spinal manipulation treatment group based on signs and symptoms).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Military personnel on active duty and eligible for healthcare at a military treatment facility
* A primary complaint of low back pain defined as symptoms of pain and/or numbness between the 12th rib and buttocks with or without symptoms into the leg(s), which, in the opinion of the provider, are originating from tissues of the lumbar region.
* Duration of current episode of low back pain \< 90 days
* Age 18 - 60 years (or emancipated minors on active duty)
* Available for the following 4 weeks to complete a regimen of treatment

Exclusion Criteria

* Oswestry Disability Index \< 20%
* History of receiving any medical care for this episode of low back pain within the last 3 months
* Prior surgery to the thoraco-lumbar spine or pelvis
* This episode of back pain is due to a traumatic fracture
* Pending a medical or physical evaluation board or discharge process, pending any litigation related to the condition, or planning on getting out of the military within the next 9 months.
* Any "red flags" that would indicate a potentially serious condition or other significant disease process. These could include but not limited to cauda equina syndrome, large or rapidly progressing neurological deficit, fracture, cancer, ankylosing spondylitis, or other systemic disease.
* Current episode occurred because of a motor vehicle accident
* Currently pregnant (or history of pregnancy in the previous 6 months)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

William Beaumont Army Medical Center

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Madigan Army Medical Center

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Julie Fritz, PT, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Utah

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Madigan Army Medical Center

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fritz JM, Childs JD, Wainner RS, Flynn TW. Primary care referral of patients with low back pain to physical therapy: impact on future health care utilization and costs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Dec 1;37(25):2114-21. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31825d32f5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22614792 (View on PubMed)

Fritz JM, Brennan GP, Hunter SJ, Magel JS. Initial management decisions after a new consultation for low back pain: implications of the usage of physical therapy for subsequent health care costs and utilization. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 May;94(5):808-16. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.01.008. Epub 2013 Jan 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23337426 (View on PubMed)

Fritz JM, Cleland JA, Speckman M, Brennan GP, Hunter SJ. Physical therapy for acute low back pain: associations with subsequent healthcare costs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jul 15;33(16):1800-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817bd853.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18628714 (View on PubMed)

Rhon DI, Miller RB, Fritz JM. Effectiveness and Downstream Healthcare Utilization for Patients That Received Early Physical Therapy Versus Usual Care for Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Oct 1;43(19):1313-1321. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002619.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29489568 (View on PubMed)

Rhon D, Fritz J. COMParative Early Treatment Effectiveness between physical therapy and usual care for low back pain (COMPETE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Sep 23;16:423. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0959-8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26399603 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

211107

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.