Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparative Effectiveness of Early Physical Therapy Versus Usual Care for Low Back Pain (NCT NCT01556581)
NCT ID: NCT01556581
Last Updated: 2020-07-14
Results Overview
The Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (OSW) is a 10-item condition-specific measure of functional status (pain and disability) for patients with low back pain (LBP). Each question has 6 possible answers (0 = worse, 5 = best). The raw score is doubled to provide a percent score from 0 to 100%; with 0 equaling no disability and 100% equalling the worst possible outcome. It measures pain-related disability. We used the modified version that replaces the sex life item with an employment/ homemaking item due to poor compliance with the former. The OSW is widely used in research on non-operative management of patients with LBP, with high levels of test-retest reliability among stable patients (ICC = 0.90), good construct validity, and responsiveness to change for patients with acute LBP. It has a minimum clinically important difference of 6 points.
COMPLETED
NA
119 participants
12 months
2020-07-14
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Usual Care (UC)
The usual care (UC) group will be managed with stepped care approach, receiving a screening exam, advice, education, activity limitation profile and medications if needed, but no early physical therapy.
Usual Care (UC): Initial management for all patients will include an activity-limiting profile for up to 30 days and a 10-day supply of medications if needed (NSAIDs and muscle relaxers). All patients will then receive advice and education about the favorable natural history of LBP and the advantages of remaining as active as possible. All patients will be recommended to follow-up with their primary care provider using normal procedures if they are not satisfied with their progress.
|
Early Physical Therapy (PT)
All subjects in this group will get usual care approach in addition to immediately receiving eight sessions of physical therapy based on a pragmatic treatment based classification system for treating low back pain.
Early Physical Therapy (PT): Patients in the early PT group will receive the same treatment as the usual care group, but will then be referred to physical therapy within 3 days. The physical therapy treatment will be based on the Treatment Based Classification system (an approach that places patients into either an extension-oriented, core strength/stabilization, or a spinal manipulation treatment group based on signs and symptoms).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
61
|
58
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
61
|
58
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Comparative Effectiveness of Early Physical Therapy Versus Usual Care for Low Back Pain
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Usual Care (UC)
n=61 Participants
The usual care (UC) group will be managed with stepped care approach, receiving a screening exam, advice, education, activity limitation profile and medications if needed, but no early physical therapy.
Usual Care (UC): Initial management for all patients will include an activity-limiting profile for up to 30 days and a 10-day supply of medications if needed (NSAIDs and muscle relaxers). All patients will then receive advice and education about the favorable natural history of LBP and the advantages of remaining as active as possible. All patients will be recommended to follow-up with their primary care provider using normal procedures if they are not satisfied with their progress.
|
Early Physical Therapy (PT)
n=58 Participants
All subjects in this group will get usual care approach in addition to immediately receiving eight sessions of physical therapy based on a pragmatic treatment based classification system for treating low back pain.
Early Physical Therapy (PT): Patients in the early PT group will receive the same treatment as the usual care group, but will then be referred to physical therapy within 3 days. The physical therapy treatment will be based on the Treatment Based Classification system (an approach that places patients into either an extension-oriented, core strength/stabilization, or a spinal manipulation treatment group based on signs and symptoms).
|
Total
n=119 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
61 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
119 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
26.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3 • n=5 Participants
|
29.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7 • n=7 Participants
|
28.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
49 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
99 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
61 participants
n=5 Participants
|
58 participants
n=7 Participants
|
119 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Active duty Soldiers in the United States Army
The Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (OSW) is a 10-item condition-specific measure of functional status (pain and disability) for patients with low back pain (LBP). Each question has 6 possible answers (0 = worse, 5 = best). The raw score is doubled to provide a percent score from 0 to 100%; with 0 equaling no disability and 100% equalling the worst possible outcome. It measures pain-related disability. We used the modified version that replaces the sex life item with an employment/ homemaking item due to poor compliance with the former. The OSW is widely used in research on non-operative management of patients with LBP, with high levels of test-retest reliability among stable patients (ICC = 0.90), good construct validity, and responsiveness to change for patients with acute LBP. It has a minimum clinically important difference of 6 points.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care (UC)
n=61 Participants
The usual care (UC) group will be managed with stepped care approach, receiving a screening exam, advice, education, activity limitation profile and medications if needed, but no early physical therapy.
Usual Care (UC): Initial management for all patients will include an activity-limiting profile for up to 30 days and a 10-day supply of medications if needed (NSAIDs and muscle relaxers). All patients will then receive advice and education about the favorable natural history of LBP and the advantages of remaining as active as possible. All patients will be recommended to follow-up with their primary care provider using normal procedures if they are not satisfied with their progress.
|
Early Physical Therapy (PT)
n=58 Participants
All subjects in this group will get usual care approach in addition to immediately receiving eight sessions of physical therapy based on a pragmatic treatment based classification system for treating low back pain.
Early Physical Therapy (PT): Patients in the early PT group will receive the same treatment as the usual care group, but will then be referred to physical therapy within 3 days. The physical therapy treatment will be based on the Treatment Based Classification system (an approach that places patients into either an extension-oriented, core strength/stabilization, or a spinal manipulation treatment group based on signs and symptoms).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Modified Oswestry Disability Index
|
23.46 score on a scale
Interval 18.91 to 28.0
|
24.26 score on a scale
Interval 19.82 to 28.69
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Active duty Soldiers in US Army
A 0-10 numeric pain rating scale ('0' indicating no pain, and '10' worst imaginable pain) will be used to assess LBP intensity. Numeric pain scales are known to have excellent test-retest reliability. Previous research has found the NPRS to be responsive to change, with a minimum clinically important difference of two points among patients with acute LBP receiving physical therapy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care (UC)
n=58 Participants
The usual care (UC) group will be managed with stepped care approach, receiving a screening exam, advice, education, activity limitation profile and medications if needed, but no early physical therapy.
Usual Care (UC): Initial management for all patients will include an activity-limiting profile for up to 30 days and a 10-day supply of medications if needed (NSAIDs and muscle relaxers). All patients will then receive advice and education about the favorable natural history of LBP and the advantages of remaining as active as possible. All patients will be recommended to follow-up with their primary care provider using normal procedures if they are not satisfied with their progress.
|
Early Physical Therapy (PT)
n=55 Participants
All subjects in this group will get usual care approach in addition to immediately receiving eight sessions of physical therapy based on a pragmatic treatment based classification system for treating low back pain.
Early Physical Therapy (PT): Patients in the early PT group will receive the same treatment as the usual care group, but will then be referred to physical therapy within 3 days. The physical therapy treatment will be based on the Treatment Based Classification system (an approach that places patients into either an extension-oriented, core strength/stabilization, or a spinal manipulation treatment group based on signs and symptoms).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
|
3.7 units on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 4.4
|
3.7 units on a scale
Interval 3.1 to 4.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 MonthsThe GRC is a 15-point scale that asks the patient to rate the degree of change in his or her condition from the beginning of treatment to the present. The mid-point of the scale is no change (0). Ratings from -1 to -7 represent varying degrees of a worsening of the patient's condition, while rating from +1 to +7 represent varying degrees of improvement. A score of 3 or higher is considered clinically meaningful change.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care (UC)
n=61 Participants
The usual care (UC) group will be managed with stepped care approach, receiving a screening exam, advice, education, activity limitation profile and medications if needed, but no early physical therapy.
Usual Care (UC): Initial management for all patients will include an activity-limiting profile for up to 30 days and a 10-day supply of medications if needed (NSAIDs and muscle relaxers). All patients will then receive advice and education about the favorable natural history of LBP and the advantages of remaining as active as possible. All patients will be recommended to follow-up with their primary care provider using normal procedures if they are not satisfied with their progress.
|
Early Physical Therapy (PT)
n=58 Participants
All subjects in this group will get usual care approach in addition to immediately receiving eight sessions of physical therapy based on a pragmatic treatment based classification system for treating low back pain.
Early Physical Therapy (PT): Patients in the early PT group will receive the same treatment as the usual care group, but will then be referred to physical therapy within 3 days. The physical therapy treatment will be based on the Treatment Based Classification system (an approach that places patients into either an extension-oriented, core strength/stabilization, or a spinal manipulation treatment group based on signs and symptoms).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Global Rating of Change (GRC) of +3 or More (Minimum Clinically Important Change)
|
16 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Usual Care (UC)
Early Physical Therapy (PT)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place