Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
4325 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-02-28
2011-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
SMART Stepped Care Management for Low Back Pain in the Military Health System
NCT04172038
Chronic Low Back Pain Graded - Exposure Psychoeducation Intervention
NCT03909048
How Does Manual Therapy Improve Low Back Pain for Soldiers?
NCT00394264
Education/Exercise and Chiropractic for Chronic Back Pain
NCT00561652
A Pilot Study Examining the Efficacy of Biomodulator Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT02707094
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Reduction of disability from LBP has been divided into 2 separate phases - primary and secondary prevention. Primary prevention refers to interventions and strategies that are implemented before a low back injury occurs.8 Primary prevention reduces LBP related disability by reducing the total number of people who eventually experience an episode of LBP. Secondary prevention refers to interventions and strategies that are implemented during the acute episode of low back injury, before chronic symptoms occur.9 Secondary prevention reduces LBP related disability by reducing the number of people who eventually experience chronic disability from LBP. We are proposing an innovative approach to LBP prevention by combining primary and secondary prevention strategies that have the potential to limit the development of chronic LBP in Soldiers.
The primary prevention strategy is a core stabilization exercise program (CSEP). The CSEP used in this study has sound biomechanical and anatomical rationale, and has demonstrated its clinical efficacy by preventing future recurrence of LBP. However, this CSEP has not been previously investigated for primary prevention of LBP in healthy Soldiers. The secondary prevention strategy is a psychosocial education program (PSEP). The PSEP used in this study has sound theoretical rationale. It has also demonstrated its clinical efficacy by favorably altering LBP beliefs, as well as limiting the eventual severity of LBP episodes.
These programs (individually or in combination) have not been investigated for prevention of chronic LBP in healthy Soldiers. Therefore, we will train healthy Soldiers in the United States Army in CSEP, PSEP, or combined CSEP/PSEP. We will compare the preventative effects of these exercise and education programs to an already implemented traditional exercise program (TEP).
Objective/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study is to determine if a combined prevention program is more effective at limiting the development of chronic LBP when compared to the effects of individual evidence-based prevention programs, or a traditional exercise program
Specific Aims Specific Aim 1: We will determine if a combined prevention program consisting of CSEP and PSEP prevents the development of chronic LBP. During advanced individual training (AIT), United States Army Soldiers will be randomly assigned to receive 1 of 4 prevention programs. Soldiers will be followed monthly to measure LBP occurrence and severity during 2 years of active duty with a web-based data collection system managed at the University of Florida.
Specific Aim 2: We will determine if the CSEP results in favorable changes in specific core musculature associated with reducing LBP. The CSEP activates specific core musculature that are important in preventing LBP. We will use real-time ultrasound imaging to document changes in core musculature that occur during AIT. We will also determine if the PSEP results in a favorable change in LBP beliefs. The PSEP educates individuals in an evidence-based, psychosocial approach to the management of LBP, which decreases the likelihood of experiencing chronic LBP. We will use a validated self-report questionnaire to measure Soldiers' LBP beliefs regarding outcome and management. We will measure LBP beliefs before and after AIT (a 12-week period).
Study Design: Cluster randomized clinical trial. Twelve companies of Soldiers (n = 2700) reporting to advanced individual training for the 91 W military occupational specialty training will be randomly assigned to CSEP and PSEP (combined education and exercise prevention program), CSEP (exercise prevention program), PSEP and TEP (educational prevention program), and TEP (standard physical training).
Relevance: The results of this study will have several immediate applications for Soldiers. The widespread incorporation of effective preventative strategies will certainly result in a substantial reduction of LBP in the military. Programs that effectively prevent the occurrence and severity of LBP would benefit the U.S. Armed Forces by improving the readiness of their Soldiers, reducing economic burden, and limiting disability among Soldiers. For example, an average cost of $136.02 per LBP visit was calculated for 2004. A 40% reduction in the recurrence of LBP after completing the CSEP would generate a cost savings of $3,343,230 by the 4th fiscal year (approximately 1/5 of the total cost of LBP for one FY).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Core stabilization and psychosocial education
A core stabilization exercise program (CSEP) is used in this group and has sound biomechanical and anatomical rationale. In addition, a psychosocial education program (PSEP) will be used for this group.
Core stabilization and psychosocial education
Includes both core stabilization training and psychosocial education class
Core stabilization exercise only
A core stabilization exercise program (CSEP) is used in this group and has sound biomechanical and anatomical rationale.
Core stabilization exercise only
Core stabilization exercise
Psychosocial education class only.
A psychosocial education program (PSEP) will be used in this group.
Psychosocial education class only
Psychosocial education class
Traditional Army training
Traditional Army training will be used in this group.
Traditional Army training
As usual training for Soldiers
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Traditional Army training
As usual training for Soldiers
Core stabilization exercise only
Core stabilization exercise
Psychosocial education class only
Psychosocial education class
Core stabilization and psychosocial education
Includes both core stabilization training and psychosocial education class
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Participating in 91 W (combat medic) MOS training
* English speaking and reading
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous medical history that includes any surgery for LBP (examples include but are not limited to lumbar fusion, lumbar decompression, and lumbar discectomy)
* History of degenerative joint disease, arthritis, spine trauma or vertebral fractures, spondylolisthesis, and congenital spine disorders
* Currently unable to participate in AIT due to injury in foot, ankle, knee, hip, neck, shoulder, elbow, wrist, or hand injury.
* History of fracture (stress or traumatic) in proximal femur and/or pelvis
18 Years
35 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Brooke Army Medical Center
FED
University of Florida
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Steven Z George, PT, PHD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Florida
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Brooke Army Medical Center
Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
George SZ, Childs JD, Teyhen DS, Wu SS, Wright AC, Dugan JL, Robinson ME. Rationale, design, and protocol for the prevention of low back pain in the military (POLM) trial (NCT00373009). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Sep 14;8:92. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-92.
George SZ, Childs JD, Teyhen DS, Wu SS, Wright AC, Dugan JL, Robinson ME. Brief psychosocial education, not core stabilization, reduced incidence of low back pain: results from the Prevention of Low Back Pain in the Military (POLM) cluster randomized trial. BMC Med. 2011 Nov 29;9:128. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-128.
Childs JD, Teyhen DS, Van Wyngaarden JJ, Dougherty BF, Ladislas BJ, Helton GL, Robinson ME, Wu SS, George SZ. Predictors of web-based follow-up response in the Prevention Of Low Back Pain In The Military Trial (POLM). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Jun 13;12:132. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-132.
Teyhen DS, George SZ, Dugan JL, Williamson J, Neilson BD, Childs JD. Inter-rater reliability of ultrasound imaging of the trunk musculature among novice raters. J Ultrasound Med. 2011 Mar;30(3):347-56. doi: 10.7863/jum.2011.30.3.347.
Childs JD, Teyhen DS, Casey PR, McCoy-Singh KA, Feldtmann AW, Wright AC, Dugan JL, Wu SS, George SZ. Effects of traditional sit-up training versus core stabilization exercises on short-term musculoskeletal injuries in US Army soldiers: a cluster randomized trial. Phys Ther. 2010 Oct;90(10):1404-12. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090389. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
Childs JD, Teyhen DS, Benedict TM, Morris JB, Fortenberry AD, McQueen RM, Preston JB, Wright AC, Dugan JL, George SZ. Effects of sit-up training versus core stabilization exercises on sit-up performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Nov;41(11):2072-83. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181a84db2.
Robinson ME, Teyhen DS, Wu SS, Dugan JL, Wright AC, Childs JD, Yang G, George SZ. Mental health symptoms in combat medic training: a longitudinal examination. Mil Med. 2009 Jun;174(6):572-7. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-02-4108.
George SZ, Teyhen DS, Wu SS, Wright AC, Dugan JL, Yang G, Robinson ME, Childs JD. Psychosocial education improves low back pain beliefs: results from a cluster randomized clinical trial (NCT00373009) in a primary prevention setting. Eur Spine J. 2009 Jul;18(7):1050-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1016-7. Epub 2009 May 6.
Childs JD, Wu SS, Andrade RL, Bonner VE, Bowman JA, Butler AM, Teyhen DS, George SZ. Incremental Effects of Telephone Call Center and Healthcare Utilization Database Use to Improve Follow-up Rate in the Prevention of Low Back Pain in the Military Trial. US Army Med Dep J. 2015 Oct-Dec:24-30.
Childs JD, Wu SS, Teyhen DS, Robinson ME, George SZ. Prevention of low back pain in the military cluster randomized trial: effects of brief psychosocial education on total and low back pain-related health care costs. Spine J. 2014 Apr;14(4):571-83. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.019. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Link to abstract and paper for primary study results
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PR054098
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.