Comparative Effectiveness of Acute Low Back Pain Management

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

220 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-04-30

Study Completion Date

2014-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Current practice guidelines for patients with acute low back pain (LBP) recommend a stepped care approach with initial treatment of education and advice to remain active. Referral to physical therapy is considered only when patients fail to recover after a few weeks. Recent research has led to the identification a subgroup of patients likely to experience rapid, pronounced, and sustained decreases in disability and pain with a brief manipulation and exercise intervention, suggesting it may be more cost-effective to manage this sub-group with early referral to physical therapy instead of the usual care approach. The integration of this evidence into routine practice has not been evaluated. We will assess the outcomes of integrating this evidence into the management of patients with low back pain. The study is a randomized trial, comparing management with early manipulation with the current care process model. Patients fitting the inclusion criteria will be randomized into one of two groups. One group will be managed with the current care process model. The other group will be managed consistent with the decision rule recommending early referral for a brief manipulation and exercise intervention during the first 4 weeks. Patients will be followed over 1 year. Outcomes will include measures of disability, pain, satisfaction, and direct medical costs. The study will examine the costs and effectiveness of integrating the alternative care model into practice.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Standardizing Management of Patients With Low Back Pain in Primary Care and Physical Therapy

NCT00769626

Back Pain Low Back Pain

TERMINATED PHASE3

Comparative Effectiveness of Early Physical Therapy Versus Usual Care for Low Back Pain

NCT01556581

Low Back Pain

COMPLETED NA

Management Strategies for Patients With Low Back Pain and Sciatica

NCT02391350

Low Back Pain Sciatica Physical Therapy

COMPLETED NA

Targeted Interventions to Prevent Chronic Low Back Pain in High Risk Patients

NCT02647658

Low Back Pain

COMPLETED NA

Patient Education for Patients With Back Pain Referred to Physical Therapy

NCT02648373

Low Back Pain

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Usual Care

Usual care arm will receive management as recommended by practice guidelines and directed by the primary care provider. The recommended stepped care approach is used with initial management of advice and education only and no referral to physical therapy during the initial 4 weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Usual Care

Intervention Type OTHER

The usual care intervention includes advice and education to remain active and provision of the Back Book highlighting these recommendations. Pharmaceuticals may be prescribed at the discretion of the primary care provider. Follow-up visits to primary care provided are recommended for all patients dissatisfied with their progress.

Early Physical Therapy with Usual Care

The Early Physical Therapy arm will receive the same advice and education intervention received by the usual care group and will be referred to receive 4 sessions of physical therapy during the first 4 weeks. The physical therapy protocol involves spinal manipulation and exercise.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Early Physical Therapy with Usual Care

Intervention Type OTHER

The early physical therapy arm includes 4 total sessions. The first 2 sessions include use of thrust spinal manipulation with exercises for range of motion and strengthening of the spine. The final 2 sessions include the exercise component only.

Usual Care

Intervention Type OTHER

The usual care intervention includes advice and education to remain active and provision of the Back Book highlighting these recommendations. Pharmaceuticals may be prescribed at the discretion of the primary care provider. Follow-up visits to primary care provided are recommended for all patients dissatisfied with their progress.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Early Physical Therapy with Usual Care

The early physical therapy arm includes 4 total sessions. The first 2 sessions include use of thrust spinal manipulation with exercises for range of motion and strengthening of the spine. The final 2 sessions include the exercise component only.

Intervention Type OTHER

Usual Care

The usual care intervention includes advice and education to remain active and provision of the Back Book highlighting these recommendations. Pharmaceuticals may be prescribed at the discretion of the primary care provider. Follow-up visits to primary care provided are recommended for all patients dissatisfied with their progress.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Symptoms of pain and/or numbness between the 12th rib and buttocks with or without symptoms into one or both legs, which, in the opinion of the primary care provider, are originating from tissues of the lumbar region.
* Age 18 - 60 years
* Oswestry disability score \> 20%
* Both of the following clinical decision rule criteria: a)Duration of current symptoms \< 16 days; and b)Patient report of no symptoms (pain, numbness, etc.) distal to the knee in past 72 hours.

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior surgery to the lumbosacral spine
* Any treatment for low back pain in past 6 months
* Current pregnancy
* Currently receiving treatment for LBP from another healthcare provider (e.g., chiropractic, massage therapy, injections, etc.)
* Presence of neurogenic LBP defined as the presence of either of the following:

a) Positive ipsilateral or contralateral straight leg raise (reproduction of symptoms at \<45 degrees); or b)Reflex, sensory, or strength deficits in a pattern consistent with lumbar nerve root compression
* Judgment of the primary care provider of "red flags" of a potentially serious condition including cauda equina syndrome, major or rapidly progressing neurological deficit, fracture, cancer, infection or systemic disease

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No