Mechanisms of Specific Trunk Exercises in Low Back Pain

NCT ID: NCT01362049

Last Updated: 2017-06-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

102 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-03-31

Study Completion Date

2013-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The research objective is to determine which physical therapy (PT) treatment is the most efficacious for patients with lower back pain (LBP), who have been subgrouped based on certain clinical features. There is only limited evidence that supports any one PT treatment for patients with LBP since PT treatment outcomes for exercise protocols are equivocal, given the heterogeneous clinical features of patients with LBP. Thus, classification of patients with LBP into subgroups with shared clinical features has been identified as a research priority by several groups in order to prescribe the most efficacious PT treatment for each homogeneous subgroup. The investigators hypothesize that particular PT treatments are most efficacious when applied to patients with LBP, who present with particular clinical and neuromuscular features.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The proposed studies focus on 2 schemas to classify LBP: 1) the Treatment-Based Classification (TBC) system, from which clinical prediction rules about who is most likely to benefit from spinal stabilization exercises (among others) have been developed, and 2) the Movement System Impairment-Based Classification (MSI) system, which includes 5 classifications of LBP named for the specific direction(s) of movements and alignments associated with the person's LBP.

The primary purpose of this proposal is to conduct a prospective, randomized, controlled Phase II clinical trial in order to examine whether or not treatment matched to a patient's specific signs and symptoms (patient-matched) per the TBC is more effective than the MSI system for improving short- (6 weeks) and long-term (12 and 24 months) outcomes in people with chronic LBP. A secondary purpose is to identify prognostic factors that predict clinical outcomes in the 2 treatment groups being compared.

Subjects will be assigned to one of two study arms:

1. eligible for Treatment-Based Classification (TBC) stabilization exercises based on current criteria ('Eligible' Subject Group); and
2. subjects who are not eligible for the TBC-based stabilization exercises ('Ineligible' Subject Group).

Within in each study arm, subjects will be randomly assigned to 1 of 2 exercise protocols for a 6-week period:

1. stabilization - a protocol focused on improving the motor control of trunk muscles to stabilize the spine; or
2. MSI-based - a classification-specific treatment focused on education and instruction for modifying movement strategies during functional activities, and on exercises specific to the classification category.

Laboratory measures (muscle activation, kinematics, forces) during standardized tasks will quantify neuromuscular impairments associated with LBP and clinical questionnaires will quantify changes in pain, function, and health status pre- and post-treatment. The addition of neuromuscular measures to these classification schemas could improve the sensitivity and specificity of each.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

'Eligible' Subject Group - STAB

Subjects between the ages of 21-55 years with low back pain \>12 months who are eligible for Treatment-Based Classification (TBC) stabilization exercises based on current criteria:

1. straight leg raise \> 90 degrees
2. aberrant trunk movement with trunk forward flexion
3. positive prone instability test AND/OR
4. passive lumbar mobility testing that is judged to be hypermobile at any level.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Physical Therapy rehabilitation: Stabilization exercises.

Intervention Type OTHER

The stabilization exercise protocol consists of exercises focused on improving the ability of trunk muscles to stabilize the spine, beginning with training to isolate the deeper abdominal muscles and then incorporation of these isolated contractions into other exercises. The exercise protocol progresses to include trunk flexion and extension strengthening exercises as well as abdominal bracing exercises in supine and quadruped positions, and finally to exercises in more functional positions.

'Ineligible' Subject Group - STAB

Subjects between the ages of 21-55 years with low back pain \>12 months who are not eligible for the TBC-based stabilization exercises based on current criteria

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Physical Therapy rehabilitation: Stabilization exercises.

Intervention Type OTHER

The stabilization exercise protocol consists of exercises focused on improving the ability of trunk muscles to stabilize the spine, beginning with training to isolate the deeper abdominal muscles and then incorporation of these isolated contractions into other exercises. The exercise protocol progresses to include trunk flexion and extension strengthening exercises as well as abdominal bracing exercises in supine and quadruped positions, and finally to exercises in more functional positions.

'Eligible' Subject Group - MSI

Subjects between the ages of 21-55 years with low back pain \>12 months who are eligible for Treatment-Based Classification (TBC) stabilization exercises based on current criteria:

1. straight leg raise \> 90 degrees
2. aberrant trunk movement with trunk forward flexion
3. positive prone instability test AND/OR
4. passive lumbar mobility testing that is judged to be hypermobile at any level.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Physical Therapy rehabilitation. Movement System Impairment (MSI) classification based exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

The MSI-classification based approach focuses on education and instruction for modifying movement strategies during functional activities, and on exercises that are specific to the classification category. First there is an analysis of and instruction in modifying a subject's direction-specific alignment and movement strategies during symptomatic functional activities. Second, there is education about the principles of tissue injury and healing, and how cumulative tissue stress contributes to microtrauma and LBP. Unique to the education process is the emphasis on how using one's particular movement strategies during functional activities may accelerate tissue stress accumulation because the strategies are used repetitively. Thirdly, there is exercise prescription that includes practice in performing modified versions of the direction-specific impairment tests from the physical exam, with an emphasis on impairments that can be modified to eliminate LBP symptoms.

'Ineligible' Subject Group -MSI

Subjects between the ages of 21-55 years with low back pain \>12 months who are not eligible for the TBC-based stabilization exercises based on current criteria

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Physical Therapy rehabilitation. Movement System Impairment (MSI) classification based exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

The MSI-classification based approach focuses on education and instruction for modifying movement strategies during functional activities, and on exercises that are specific to the classification category. First there is an analysis of and instruction in modifying a subject's direction-specific alignment and movement strategies during symptomatic functional activities. Second, there is education about the principles of tissue injury and healing, and how cumulative tissue stress contributes to microtrauma and LBP. Unique to the education process is the emphasis on how using one's particular movement strategies during functional activities may accelerate tissue stress accumulation because the strategies are used repetitively. Thirdly, there is exercise prescription that includes practice in performing modified versions of the direction-specific impairment tests from the physical exam, with an emphasis on impairments that can be modified to eliminate LBP symptoms.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Physical Therapy rehabilitation: Stabilization exercises.

The stabilization exercise protocol consists of exercises focused on improving the ability of trunk muscles to stabilize the spine, beginning with training to isolate the deeper abdominal muscles and then incorporation of these isolated contractions into other exercises. The exercise protocol progresses to include trunk flexion and extension strengthening exercises as well as abdominal bracing exercises in supine and quadruped positions, and finally to exercises in more functional positions.

Intervention Type OTHER

Physical Therapy rehabilitation. Movement System Impairment (MSI) classification based exercise

The MSI-classification based approach focuses on education and instruction for modifying movement strategies during functional activities, and on exercises that are specific to the classification category. First there is an analysis of and instruction in modifying a subject's direction-specific alignment and movement strategies during symptomatic functional activities. Second, there is education about the principles of tissue injury and healing, and how cumulative tissue stress contributes to microtrauma and LBP. Unique to the education process is the emphasis on how using one's particular movement strategies during functional activities may accelerate tissue stress accumulation because the strategies are used repetitively. Thirdly, there is exercise prescription that includes practice in performing modified versions of the direction-specific impairment tests from the physical exam, with an emphasis on impairments that can be modified to eliminate LBP symptoms.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Trunk stabilization exercises Segmental stabilization exercises Specific exercise Sarhmann exercise approach MSI exercises

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* a history of chronic LBP with or without recurrences for a minimum of 12 months;
* between 21 - 55 years of age;
* able to stand and walk without assistance;
* have an Oswestry Disability Score of 19% or higher AND/OR less than an 8 on one activity reported on the Patient Specific Functional Scale,

Exclusion Criteria

* any major structural spinal deformity including scoliosis, kyphosis, or stenosis;
* spinal fracture or dislocation;
* osteoporosis;
* ankylosing spondylitis;
* rheumatoid arthritis;
* disc herniation with corroborating clinical signs and symptoms;
* serious spinal complications such as tumor or infection;
* previous spinal surgery;
* frank neurological loss, i.e., weakness and sensory loss;
* pain or paresthesia below the knee;
* etiology of LBP other than the lumbar spine, e.g., hip joint;
* history of neurological disease which required hospitalization;
* active treatment for cancer;
* history of unresolved cancer;
* pregnancy or less than 6 months post-partum or less than 6 months post weaning;
* magnified symptom-behavior;
* worker's compensation or disability case;
* in litigation for the LBP problem;
* have a BMI ≥ 30.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Vermont

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sharon M. Henry

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sharon M Henry, PT, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Vermont

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Human Motion Analysis Lab

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jacobs JV, Roy CL, Hitt JR, Popov RE, Henry SM. Neural mechanisms and functional correlates of altered postural responses to perturbed standing balance with chronic low back pain. Neuroscience. 2016 Dec 17;339:511-524. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.10.032. Epub 2016 Oct 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27771534 (View on PubMed)

Boucher JA, Preuss R, Henry SM, Dumas JP, Lariviere C. The effects of an 8-week stabilization exercise program on lumbar movement sense in patients with low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jan 14;17:23. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0875-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26762185 (View on PubMed)

Mehta R, Cannella M, Henry SM, Smith S, Giszter S, Silfies SP. Trunk Postural Muscle Timing Is Not Compromised In Low Back Pain Patients Clinically Diagnosed With Movement Coordination Impairments. Motor Control. 2017 Apr;21(2):133-157. doi: 10.1123/mc.2015-0049. Epub 2016 Aug 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26623551 (View on PubMed)

Jacobs JV, Lomond KV, Hitt JR, DeSarno MJ, Bunn JY, Henry SM. Effects of low back pain and of stabilization or movement-system-impairment treatments on induced postural responses: A planned secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Man Ther. 2016 Feb;21:210-9. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Aug 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26324322 (View on PubMed)

Henry SM, Van Dillen LR, Trombley AR, Dee JM, Bunn JY. Reliability of novice raters in using the movement system impairment approach to classify people with low back pain. Man Ther. 2013 Feb;18(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.06.008. Epub 2012 Jul 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22796388 (View on PubMed)

Lariviere C, Gagnon D, De Oliveira E Jr, Henry SM, Mecheri H, Dumas JP. Reliability of ultrasound measures of the transversus abdominis: effect of task and transducer position. PM R. 2013 Feb;5(2):104-13. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.11.002. Epub 2013 Jan 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23313039 (View on PubMed)

Lariviere C, Gagnon D, De Oliveira E Jr, Henry SM, Mecheri H, Dumas JP. Ultrasound measures of the lumbar multifidus: effect of task and transducer position on reliability. PM R. 2013 Aug;5(8):678-87. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 Mar 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23507347 (View on PubMed)

Zielinski KA, Henry SM, Ouellette-Morton RH, DeSarno MJ. Lumbar multifidus muscle thickness does not predict patients with low back pain who improve with trunk stabilization exercises. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jun;94(6):1132-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.12.001. Epub 2012 Dec 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23228626 (View on PubMed)

Henry SM, Fritz JM, Trombley AR, Bunn JY. Reliability of a treatment-based classification system for subgrouping people with low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Sep;42(9):797-805. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.4078. Epub 2012 Jun 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22677525 (View on PubMed)

Lomond KV, Jacobs JV, Hitt JR, DeSarno MJ, Bunn JY, Henry SM. Effects of low back pain stabilization or movement system impairment treatments on voluntary postural adjustments: a randomized controlled trial. Spine J. 2015 Apr 1;15(4):596-606. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.10.020. Epub 2014 Oct 29.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25452017 (View on PubMed)

Henry SM, Van Dillen LR, Ouellette-Morton RH, Hitt JR, Lomond KV, DeSarno MJ, Bunn JY. Outcomes are not different for patient-matched versus nonmatched treatment in subjects with chronic recurrent low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Spine J. 2014 Dec 1;14(12):2799-810. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.024. Epub 2014 Mar 22.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24662210 (View on PubMed)

Lomond KV, Henry SM, Jacobs JV, Hitt JR, Horak FB, Cohen RG, Schwartz D, Dumas JA, Naylor MR, Watts R, DeSarno MJ. Protocol to assess the neurophysiology associated with multi-segmental postural coordination. Physiol Meas. 2013 Oct;34(10):N97-105. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/34/10/N97. Epub 2013 Sep 25.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24065623 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5R01HD040909-07

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

CHRMS 10-045

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.